Allahabad Court November 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Rajmani Mishra
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
1. We have heard Shri J.K. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-appellants. Shri H.S.N. Tripathi appears for the respondent. 2. This intra court special appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court arise out of judgment of learned Single Judge dated 16th August, 2002 by which the writ petition was allowed, and while setting aside the order dated 2nd July, 2001 passed by the Inspector general, Registration, U.P. at Allahabad a direction was issued to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation as a clerk in the Registration Department in accordance with the Rules of 1998. Learned Single Judge further directed that since the petitioner was allowed to continue from 1st May, 1991 to 31st October, 1991, he will be entitled to emoluments upto 31st October, 1991. The prayer for emoluments upto January 1993 was not accepted. 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the writ petition are that the petitioner was appointed as daily wage clerk in the ...
Basanti and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
1. This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionists against the order dated 24.7.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.4, Jaunpur in S.T.No.304/05, State v. Ram Prasad under Section 302, 201 IPC, P.S. Sarai Khwaja, Jaunpur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 22.2.05 Smt. Chinta Devi wife of younger brother of the complainant Mool Chand had gone to the tube well of one Bahadur. She had gone to take water from the said tube well to irrigate her agricultural field. She had left her home for the said purpose at about 1 p.m. When she did not come back in the evening the complainant and his family members felt concerned and they went to the residence of Bahadur to enquire about Smt.Chinta Devi. There they were informed that Smt.Chinta Devi had left tube well at about 3 p.m. The complainant again came back to his house but by that time Smt.Chinta Devi had not come back. At about 10.00 in the night the complainant again went to the residence of Bahadur wh...
Mohammad at Noor Mohammad Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
1. This revision has been filed against the order dated 20.2.2009 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Jaunpur in S.T. No. 411 of 2008 ( State v. Amir and others). 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 31.7.2008 at about 7.00 P.M. in village Mani Kala, P.S. Kheta Sarai, District Jaunpur, an altercation took place between the revisionist and one Akram. The revisionist started abusing Akram. In the meanwhile opposite party no. 2 Habibulla alongwith his brother Shukurullah reached at the scene of altercation. They rebuked the revisionist and asked him not to abuse Akram and his family members. An enraged revisionist went inside his house and came out holding a knife in his hand alongwith his brother Amir and started inflicting knife blows upon Shukurullah. Shukurullah received severe knife injuries, fell down on the ground and died at the spot. An F.I.R. was lodged with the police on the same day at about 8.15 P.M. The matter was investigated and a cha...
Ms Manoj Mini Rice Mill and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
1. We have heard Shri V.K. Singh assisted by Shri G.K. Malviya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel appears for State respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri C.K. Parekh appears for Nagar Palika Parishad, Mirzapur. Shri P.C. Shukla has entered appearance for U.P. Pollution Control Board. Notices were issued to the private respondents. 2. M/s Manoj Mini Rice Mill is a proprietorship firm of which Shri Dinesh Chand is the proprietor. The firm is running a mini rice mill in the name and style of M/s Manoj Mini Rice Mill at Angarh Mahaveer Road, Mirzapur under a license dated 10.1.1990 issued by the Licensing Authority under the Rice Milling Industries Regulation Act, 1958. The firm also has a license for sale and purchase of paddy and rice under the U.P. Scheduled Commodities (Licensing and Restriction of Holding) Order, 1999, and a license as manufacturer-trader under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhniyam, 1964. 3. The petitioner claims that the mini rice plant ...
Shreyaskar Tripathi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
1. 'Saraswati Vidya Mandir Inter College Kakari Pariyojna Sonebhadra' is a recognised, unaided educational institution governed by the provisions of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921(in short the Act of 1921). It was recognised as Higher Secondary School on 29.3.2001, and as Intermediate College for classes upto Class XII, on 25.9.2004. The Committee of Management of the institution was recognised by Regional Committee chaired by the Joint Director of Education, Vindhyachal Region, Mirzapur dated 2.1.2007. Shri Shyam Sunder Singh is the President and Shri Uma Shanker Singh is the Manager of the institution.2. Bhartiya Shiksha Samiti, Uttar Pradesh Purva Allahabad is a society, which is not stated to be registered and has any concern with the Saraswati Vidya Mandir Inter College Kakari Pariyojna, Sonebhadra. The Secretary of the Society transferred the petitioner vide impugned order dated 13.7.2007 from Saraswati Vidya Mandir Inter College Kakari Pariyojna Sonebhadra, to Barati ...
Khem Singh Vs. District Magistrate of Administrator, Moradabad and ors ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-25-2010
1. We have heard Shri Aseem Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Manish Goyal appears for the District Cooperative Bank Ltd., Moradabad. 2. Shri Khem Singh, the petitioner-appellant in Special Appeal No.982 of 2007; Shri Rajvir Singh son of Shri Khoob Singh, the petitioner appellant in Special Appeal No.3 of 2000 and Shri Rajvir Singh the petitioner appellant in Special Appeal No.4 of 2009 are aggrieved by common judgment of learned Single Judge dated 22.5.2007 by which he dismissed the Writ Petition Nos.7366 of 1993; 5382 of 1993 and 5384 of 1983 challenging the orders by which the petitioners' services as Clerks/ Cashiers in the bank were dismissed on the charges of indiscipline and embezzlement of public money. The petitioners had challenged the orders on the ground that the charges were based on audit objections in the case of Khem Singh and were not proved for embezzlement in respect of Rajvir Singh son of Khoob Singh, and Rajvir Singh son of Rabhubar Singh. The pet...
Committee of Management, Sri Ram Janki Inter College and Another Vs. S ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-25-2010
1. The present special has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23rd September 2010 passed by the learned single Judge whereby the writ petition preferred by the present appellants has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows: 3. Shri Ram Janki Inter College, situate in Sarokhanpur, Badlapur in district Jaunpur, is a recognised and aided institution, which is governed by the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (hereinafter referred to as the Education Act) and U.P. High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971 (24 of 1971) (hereinafter referred to as the 1971 Act). It has a Scheme of Administration duly approved by the Deputy Director of Education on 08.12.1962. After the U.P. Intermediate Education (Amendment) Act, 1980 (U.P. Act No. 1 of 1981) was enforced, the Deputy Director of Education, Varanasi Region, Varanasi vide letter dated 25.01.1985 effec...
Rahul Kumar Chaubey Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-23-2010
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition has been heard and is being decided finally under the rules of the Court at the admission stage since pleadings are complete. 2. The order impugned in this writ petition is dated 19/20 September, 2008 passed by Senior Superintendent, Mandal/Zila Karagar, Azamgarh (Annexure 11 to the writ petition) whereby petitioner's appointment made on 18th December, 2004 on the post of Bandi Rakshak in Azamgarh Division has been cancelled on the ground that the Sport certificate submitted by the petitioner has been found forged, on the basis whereof the petitioner was selected for interview and in the ultimate merit list. The impugned order says that it is only on account of the marks earned by the petitioner on the basis of Sports certificate that he could get his position in the merit list to get appointment and since that basis i.e. Sports certificate has been found for...
Nawab Singh Vs. Shiv Raj Singh and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-23-2010
1. This matter was heard at length by me. After going through the order of the first appellate court, impugned in this second appeal, the Court finds that it has been recorded that the earlier order of remand passed in the first appeal by the Additional Civil Judge was legally not justified. Therefore, ignoring the order of remand and the direction issued therein, the first appeal has been decided afresh on merit. 2. This has led a very peculiar situation where a final judgment in a first appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. by the competent court at the relevant time has been held to be bad by a court exercising the same jurisdiction under Section 96 C.P.C. 3. Facts in short giving rise to this second appeal are as follows: 4. Original Suit No. 214 of 1981, the valuation whereof was Rs. 5000/-, was decreed by the trial court at the relevant time i. e. Munsif on 04.03.1983. A first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed before the District Judge, being Civi...
Samaya Singh and Others. Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-22-2010
1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with a prayer to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 19.10.2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Mathura in criminal case no.95 of 2003 State v. Samaya Singh & others under sections 323, 504, 308 IPC, Police Station Naujheel, District Mathura, whereby the discharge application filed by the petitioners was rejected. 2. Heard Sri B.B. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for respondent no.1 and Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 3. Respondents no.2 & 3 are formal parties. 4. The facts of the case are that on 16.10.2002, NCR No.67 of 2002 was lodged by respondent no.4 against the three petitioners Samaya Singh, Smt. Rajesh and Pappu as well as one Navla son of Pyarey alleging therein that on 16.10.2002 at 17:30 hours in village Chhinparai, Police Station Naujheel, District Mathura. The four accused assault...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »