Allahabad Court January 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashish Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-05-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1186
Shashi Kant Gupta, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the impugned order dated 23.11.2006. passed by respondent No. 3 and for directing the respondents to accord approval and appoint the petitioner on the post of Lab. Assistant (Chemistry) forthwith with all consequential benefits.2. The background facts in a nutshell essentially are as follows:3. Raghu Nath Girls (P.G.) College, Meerut (in short 'institution') is affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut and is governed by Higher Education Services Commission Act, U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 and statutes made thereunder. The aforesaid institution issued an advertisement inviting the applications for the post of Clerk, Bursar and Laboratory Assistant (Chemistry). The essential qualification mentioned in the aforesaid advertisement for the post of Lab Assistant (Chemistry) was Intermediate with Chemistry and the candidates having experience in computer was to be given priority over ...
Ragistrar, Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj University Vs. Vinay Gupta and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-05-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1316
Ashok Bhushan and Arun Tandon, JJ.1. Heard Sri Neeraj Tiwari, learned Counsel for the appellant, Sri S.K. Srivastava, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and learned standing counsel for respondent No. 2.2. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that this special appeal be decided at this stage, without calling for any further affidavits.3. This is a special appeal against the judgment and order of the Hon'ble single Judge dated 11th November, 2008, whereby the writ petition filed by respondent No. 1, Vinay Gupta has been allowed.4. Brief facts necessary for appreciating the issues raised in the special appeal are as follows:5. The appellant University published a notice for admission to LL.B. three years degree course. The respondent No. 1 applied in pursuance thereof and was permitted to appear in the entrance test, in which out of nearly 4,000 students he secured 35th position. However, he was not granted admission by the University on the ground that he did not have 45% marks at th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›