Allahabad Court February 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Krishna Murari Lal and Sri Hem Dutt Sons of Jagdish Prasad Vs. 2nd ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1234
S.U. Khan, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Petitioners' grand father Nekram executed a registered gift deed on 18.3.1972 transferring 26 bighas agricultural land to the petitioners, who were minors at that time, through their mother /guardian Shrimati Dayawati. In ceiling proceedings under Section 10 of UP. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, against Jagdish Prasad, father of the petitioners, the petitioners' land (i.e. land which was gifted to them by their grand father on 18.3.1972) was also clubbed. After decision of ceiling proceedings against Jagdish Prasad, father of the petitioners, petitioners through their mother filed objections under Section 13 of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, before the Prescribed Authority regarding the land in dispute. Prescribed Authority under the Ceiling Act / Sub Divisional Officer Khair district Aligarh on 14.10.1981 rejected the objections and held that this question was raised by the father of the petitioner...
Atul Chand Tyagi S/O V.D. Tyagi Vs. Zila Sahkari Federation Limited Th ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: [2007(113)FLR260]
Bharati Sapru, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Y.K. Sinha and Sri Satish Chaturvedi appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against an order of dismissal passed against him dated 25.9.2003 by the respondent No. 2 Secretary Zila Sahkari Federation Limited, Vikas Bhawan, Moti Bagh, Bulandshahr.3. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as an engineer in the Zila Sahkari Federation Limited, Bulandshahr in the grade of Rs. 400-750. The letter of appointment dated 28.2.1981 is on record as Annexure 1 to the writ petition, which records that U.P. Institutional Service Board, Lucknow vide its letter dated 6.1.1981 had approved his appointment as a Cold Storage Engineer. There is another letter on record dated 1.4.1981, which states that services of the petitioner would be governed under the U.P. Sahkari Simiti Adhiniyam, 1965 and Regulations framed under Section 122 thereof. The Regulations have...
J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. K.P. Agrawal and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1751
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment dated 28.7.2003 of the Allahabad High Court rejecting Civil Misc. W.P. No. 10713/83 filed by the appellant challenging the award dated 8.3.1983 and subsequent modification order dated 29.6.1983 of Labour Court II, Kanpur.2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are as under:2.1. The first respondent was working as an Assistant in the appellant company. He was issued three charge-sheets dated 5.2.1977, 17.2.1977 and 24.2.1977 (amended on 1.3.1977). First respondent filed his objections/explanation in respect of each charge-sheet. An inquiry was held into the charges. Accepting the report of the Inquiry Officer, which held that the charges were proved, the employer imposed the punishment of dismissal on the first respondent, by order dated 6.4.1977.2.2. Conciliation proceedings initiated in respect of such dismissal, failed. Consequently, the State Government referred the following dispute to the labou...
Deep Chand and ors. Vs. Viith Addl. District Judge and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)AWC2680
S.U. Khan, J.1. This writ petition was earlier allowed by me on 5.10.2006 without hearing learned Counsel for the contesting respondent as he had not appeared on the said date. Afterwards rehearing application was filed which was allowed on 22.12.2006 and on the same date arguments on merits were also heard.2. O.S. No. 2 of 1974 instituted by Udaiveer Singh respondent No. 3 for specific performance of agreement for sale against the petitioners was decreed ex parte on 14.3.1978 by IIIrd Additional Civil Judge, Agra. Restoration application filed on 26.5.1978 was dismissed on 21.4.1979 and the said order was maintained in Civil Revision No. 11 of 1980 which was dismissed by VIIth Additional District Judge, Agra on 20.7.1984 hence this writ petition.3. Against the rejection of restoration application appeal is maintainable under Order XLIII, Rule 1(d), C.P.C. However revisional jurisdiction is also part of appellate jurisdiction. In any case appeal would also have been maintainable before...
Naresh Chandra Gupta Vs. Rajendra Mohan Mishra
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)AWC1973
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard Sri Komal Mehrotra for the petitioner and Sri P.K. Jain for the respondent.2. This petition arises out of the judgment and order dated 24.11.2006, passed by the Additional District Judge XVI, Kanpur Nagar, Kanpur in S.C.C. Revision No. 1991 of 2005 and the judgment and order dated 29.7.2005, passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar, Kanpur in S.C.C. Case No. 35 of 2004.3. By the judgment and order dated 29.7.2005 the Judge, Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar, Kanpur has decreed the suit against the defendant-petitioner-tenant to handover vacant possession of the premises in dispute to the plaintiff-respondent-landlord within 30 days holding the plaintiff to be entitled to receive Rs. 3,271 as arrears of rent and Rs. 588.77 as taxes apart from Rs. 100 as costs.4. By order dated 24.11.2006 the revisional court has partly allowed the revision filed by the petitioner by rejecting the revision in respect of his ejectment and modifying the judgment and decr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›