Allahabad Court September 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohan Babu Vs. Prakash Chand and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-06-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)AWC799
ORDERRakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the petitioner.2. This is tenant's petition. The petitioner filed Original Suit No. 31 of 1995 in the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Aligarh for temporary/ permanent injunction restraining the defendant-landlord from evicting him from the disputed accommodation. Aggrieved against rejection of application for temporary/permanent injunction by both the courts below, he filed Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17195 of 2005 which was disposed of by High Court vide judgment and order dated 14.3.2005 with the direction to the courts below to decide the matter expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.3. Tenant-petitioner relied upon an agreement of tenancy dated 19.11.1994 between him and the landlord before the trial court and the rent receipts duly signed by the defendant-landlord. Defendant-landlord refused to acknowledge his signatures on the rent receipts produced by the tenant with Application No. 153-Ga. The tenant moved another A...
Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-06-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)AWC320
ORDERRakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the petitioneRs.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the institution-Basic Primary Pathshala Alayee (Balak) is tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 75 of a building bearing old No. 1252 and new No. 1371, Mohalla Alyaes, Mauranlpur, Jhansi, which is owned by one Smt. Bhawani Bai w/o Sri Govind Das Bichpuria.3. The petitioners claim that Smt. Bhawani Bai proposed that if name of institution is changed in the name of her late husband as 'Sri Govind Das Bichpuria Primary Pathshala Alayee (Balak), Mauranipur, Jhansi' she would donate the building by a registered Will deed in favour of the institution.4. The petitioners claim that the aforesaid proposal was accepted by Basic Shiksha Adhlkari, Jhansi on 2.12.1993 and permission for change of the name of institution was accorded with the condition that registration fee for transfer of the building in the name of the petitioner would have to be borne by Smt. Bhawani Bai. Accordingly, the name o...
Nagendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: (2007)(2)SLJ17CAT
1. The applicant, a reserved category candidate, had applied in October, 1997 for Vocational Course in Railway Commercial (VCRC) commencing in the academic year 1998 - 99. Those who pass the entrance examination and qualify for admission in order of merit list will be admitted to the two years VCRC provided they passed the 10th class examination with at least 50% marks (40% in the case of SC/ST), OBC candidates) in aggregate. And the respondents have fixed the minimum standard of marks to qualify the vocational course for offering appointment on the Railway to the extent that students who pass the course by securing at least 55% marks (45% in case of SC/ST/OBC) in Railway Commercial working as well as in the aggregate in the other subjects, i.e. English, second language offered by the School, Railway Commercial Working (Theory and Practical), Economics and Accountancy, subject also to fulfillment of other conditions regarding time period and medical test would be offered the appointme...
Association of Teachers and Other Staff of Sri Ratan Singh Inter Colle ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC3874
S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Impugned order in the present writ petition is the order passed by Regional Joint Director of Education, Agra Region, Agra rejecting the complaint of Teacher and employees Association against Management and refusing to appoint Prabandh Sanchalak.2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing counsel.3. The allegations made in the complaint are as regard to irregularities allegedly committed by Management. The order passed by Regional Joint Director of Education rejecting the complaint with the observation that it is not a case for appointing Prabandh Sanchalak. This Court is of the view that there is no error of law apparent on the face of record as observed in the impugned order that it may be case under Section 16-D of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, State Government may initiate proceedings if allegations made in the complaint are established.4. Second question arises in the present case is that Committee of Management is appointing/discipli...
Komal Singh Son of Sri Man Singh Vs. General Manager (P) (Appellate Au ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: (2007)2LLJ431All
Dilip Gupta, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 18th March, 2000 passed by the Assistant General Manager, Syndicate Bank by which the petitioner has been removed from the services of the Bank with immediate effect without disqualification for future employment. The petitioner has also sought the quashing of the order dated 15th September, 2000 by which the appeal filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid order of removal from service was dismissed by the General Manager of the Syndicate Bank. The consequential reliefs of salary, increments and other benefits to which the petitioner would have been entitled to, if he had not been removed from service have also been claimed.2. The petitioner was working as a Clerk in the Meerut Cantt. Branch of the Syndicate Bank (hereinafter referred to as the 'Bank'). On 30th December, 1998 some burglars broke upon the strong room of the Bank in the night and burgled Rs. 7,30,000/- after murdering Sri Banwari Lal wh...
Ashok Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Minor Irrig ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC4133
Amitava Lala, J.1. The order impugned under challenge being dated 7.8.2006 is Annexure-9 to the writ petition, whereunder the power of drawing and disbursing of the Executive Engineer, M.L.C.D., Varanasi was withdrawn by the Senior Deputy Accountant General (Works) requesting the State to make an alternative arrangement for smooth functioning of the division immediately. Such order has been challenged by saying that the Senior Deputy Accountant General (Works) or the Accountant General has no authority to take an action, which is in the nature of disciplinary action. This action is in persona against the petitioner herein. By filing counter-affidavit several provisions of Financial Handbook have been shown by the respondents. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 said that first of all one aspect is to be clarified by this Court as to who are the Divisional Officers. Now, we get the meaning of the same under Article 22 of Chapter II of the Financial Handbook, as follows:22...
Mahendra Kumar Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC4126
Dilip Gupta, J.1. The petitioner has sought the quashing of the order dated 16.6.2006 passed by the State Government by which the application filed by the petitioner for relaxing the time limit requirement of five years in moving the application for seeking compassionate appointment under the provisions of the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying in Harness) Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules') was rejected. The quashing of the order dated 27.6.2006 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Banda communicating the aforesaid order of the State Government has also been sought alongwith the consequential relief of granting appointment to the petitioner on compassionate ground after relaxing the prescribed time limit for making the application.2. The father of the petitioner, while serving as a Head Constable in U.P. Police, died on 17.7.1987. The petitioner was a minor of about six years at the time of death of his father. He completed his Graduation ...
Ram Dabar and Ram Avadh Sons of Acchhey Vs. the Deputy Director, Conso ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1156
Poonam Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri Namwar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Bajrangi Misra, learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondent Nos. 5/1 to 5/4.2. The dispute relates to plot Nos. 169 and 170 of 'Khata No. 22-Aa and also plot no, 63 of Khata No. 22-Ba of village Noorpur Mahul, Tehsil Phulpur, District Azamgarh. Certain relevant facts pointed out by the counsel for the petitioners is that disputed plots belonged to one Ahmad Hassan and Achhaibar. Ahmad Hassan was a tenant of the Sir, who is said to have migrated to Pakistan. Consequent to his migration, his property was declared as evacuee property. One Moinuddin purchased plots from the custodian under the sale certificate dated 23.2.1960, which is brought on record along with ' supplementary rejoinder affidavit. Subsequently Moin Uddin aforesaid executed a sale deed of plot Nos. 169 and 170 in favour of Mahboob respondent No. 5 vide sale deed dated 9.4.1962 and also transferred plot No. 63 in favour...
Zafar Ibrahim Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1631
Rakesh Sharma, J.1. Both the above-noted writ petitions arise out of a common judgment and order dated 22.12.2003, passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Lucknow and involve a common controversy, hence the same are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Sri Anil Kumar, advocate appears for the petitioner landlord, Zafar Ibrahim, owner of the building No. 31/37, also known as 14, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Hazratganj, Lucknow, who has sought enhancement of rent of his aforesaid property, hereinafter referred to as the premises.3. Sri Sudeep Seth, advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent tenant, i.e., U.P. Cooperative Bank Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Bank), who is having its branch office at the above-mentioned premises in Hazratganj area of the city of Lucknow.4. The landlord has assailed the judgment and order dated 22.12.2003 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Lucknow in Rent Appeal No. 26/2003, the U.P. Cooperative Bank Ltd...
Uttar Pradesh Upbhokta Sahkari Sangh Limited Through Its Managing Dire ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC3956
S. Rafat Alam and Sudhir Agarwal, JJ.1. This Special Appeal, under the Rules of the Court, is preferred against the judgment of the Hon'ble Single Judge dated 4.8.2006 whereby Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 43327 of 2003 of the sole petitioner-respondent has been allowed and the order imposing punishment of dismissal has been set aside.2. Heard Shri H.R. Mishra, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri Anil Bhushan, learned Counsel for the respondent. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final disposal.3. It appears that the petitioner-respondent was working as a sales man under the U.P. Consumer Co-operative Federation Limited and his services were governed by the U.P. Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975. However, on account of certain lapses and misconduct a departmental inquiry was initiated against him, which ultimately ended in punishment of dismissal. The aggrieved respondent preferred the aforesaid writ petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »