Allahabad Court July 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jogendra Singh Son of Sri Amir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Prade ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2006
Reported in: 2007(116)ECC53; 2007LC53(Allahabad)
R.P. Yadav, J.1. These are two petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter called the Code) for quashing the charge-sheet dated 17.2.2003 (Annexure No. 2 to the petition) and the order dated 15.2.2005 (Annexure-7) passed by III Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow rejecting the objection/representation filed by the petitioners pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 18.1.2005 in Criminal Misc Case No. 557 of 2003 (Vivek Chaturverdi and Ors. v. State of U.P and Ors.) and Criminal Misc. Case No. 617 of 2003 (Jogindra Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors. ), whereby the summoning order dated 15.3.2003 was quashed by this Court and the petitioners were given an opportunity to file a representation and the learned Magistrate was directed to pass appropriate orders thereon after deciding the question of requirement of sanction under Section 197 of the Code.2. Criminal Misc Case No. No. 977 of 2005 has been filed by S/Shri Vivek Chaturvedi. D.P...
Jagdeo and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC4216
S.U. Khan, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition arises out of consolidation proceedings and involves question of title.3. There were two brothers Sheobhikh and Sheoratan. Petitioner No. 1 and 2 are sons of Beni and petitioners 3 to 5 are sons of Bhagwandin, Beni and Bhagwandin were sons of Sheoratan. Contesting respondents are descendants of Sheobhikh. Respondent No. 3 Ram Sumer and Respondent No. 7 Balbhadra are sons of Sheobhikh. The other respondents i.e. respondents 4 to 6 are sons of Gayadin who was third son of Sheobhikh.4. Dispute relates to Khata No. 92 containing plot Nos. 343, 346/1 and 346/2. In the basic year (i.e. the year immediately preceding start of consolidation operation in the area in question) the name of Ram Sumer, respondent No. 3 was recorded as Sirdar of the land in dispute. Petitioners and respondents 4 to 7 tiled objections before CO under Section 9(2) of U.P.C.H. Act contending therein that Sheobhikh and Sheoratan were brothers he...
Hazi Rais Son of Late Sri Abdul Rasheed Vs. State of U.P. Through Secr ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC4208
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent State authorities to provide a gunner to the petitioner for his security.2. Petitioner claims that he is an Editor of the newspaper 'Khozi Hui Khabrein' and for that purpose, he travels and collects news from various places in Kanpur region. Due to outstanding activities of the petitioner's newspaper, several criminal minded persons are behind him and may hatch a plan to kill his entire family because the petitioner has always published the correct news against them. As the petitioner has been receiving continuous threats to his life and the lives of his family members as well as his property, he made an application to the State Government for providing a gunner for safety and security. Considering his need bona fide, in March 2005, he was given a gunner at the cost of 25 percent, who continued with him from 24.03.2005 to 23.04.2005, i.e. only for a period of one month. Again, the respondent Stat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›