Allahabad Court January 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kesar Enterprises Limited, Post Office Liaison Officer Through Its Add ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: AIR2006All114; 2006(1)AWC904
S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for Caveator.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner urged that against an order passed by the Consolidation Officer, an appeal was preferred by 15 persons, but Vakalatnama was signed by only one person as such the appeal on behalf of other persons was not maintainable. The Appellate authority has not taken into consideration this aspect while entertaining the Appeal.3. Considered arguments of learned Counsel for the petitioner:4. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the judgment rendered in Civil Appeal No. 6701 of 2005 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22578 of 2002), Udav Shanker Trivar v. Ram Kalewar Prasad Singh and Anr. decided on 10.11.2005, the appellants before the Appellate Authority (Assistant Settlement Officer, Consolidation, Bareilly) are entitled to have an opportunity to get the defect removed. Paragraph-15 of the judgment of the Apex Court is being reproduced below:-15. It is, thus, ...
Shiv Lal, Sub Divisional Magistrate Mahoba/Administrator, Nagar Pancha ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)AWC1272
Sabhajeet Yadav, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 3.11.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Contempt Petition No. 2101 of 2004 Ram Babu Dwivedi v. Smt. Rama Devi and Ors. under the contempt of Courts Act whereby the Appellant is convicted and sentenced for a period of 15 days imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1000/- and in failure to deposit the aforesaid amount of fine the appellant is further directed to under go imprisonment for a period of one week.2. The facts of the case in brief are that the opposite party was working as Tax Moharrir cum clerk in the Nagar Panchayat Kabrai District Mahoba. He was placed under suspension by an order dated 28.2.2003. The aforesaid order was challenged by him in writ petition No. 14661 of 2003. Vide order dated 4.4.2003 passed by writ court the aforesaid order has been stayed. The interim order dated 4.4.2003 is reproduced as under:In view of the aforesaid submission it is ...
Modi Cloth Mills, Ghaziabad Unit of Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Co ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: [2006(109)FLR242]
Bharati Sapru, J.1. This petition has been filed by M/s. Modi Cloth Mills, Modinagar, Ghaziabad against an order dated 3.3.1994 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner who is the appropriate authority under Section 25O(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), The petitioner mill had moved an application on 11.12.1993 under Section 25O of the Act, seeking permission to close down its unit at Ghaziabad as it had ceased to be viable.2. The facts of the case are that petitioner mill was established in 1949 and over the years, the petitioner company could not modernize its unit and the company started facing heavy losses. By the year 1993 the condition of the petitioner unit was very poor as neither the company was able to update and modernize its plant and machinery nor it was able to cope with the other financial liabilities and was unable to run its unit.3. In fact the petitioner unit had been declared as a sick unit on 15.6.1990 and the matter was p...
Ghanshyam Kumar Shukla Son of Late Devi Kant Shukla Vs. State of Uttar ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ1432
K.N. Sinha, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 2.2. The facts of this case are that Ghanshyam Prasad Tripathi is landlord and applicant G.K. Shukla is the tenant. The allegations are that G.K. Shukla, without the consent of the landlord, moved an application before the Electricity Department for increasing the load of 560 Watts to 3 Kg. Watts and also deposited Rs. 1618/-. In order to carry out he also forged the signature of the complainant. The other accused, without any verification of photograph, granted increase of load. The complainant (Opposite party No. 2) also approached the Department but of no avail hence he filed a complaint. The complainant examined himself and witnesses, whereupon summoning order was passed on 23.7.2001. Being aggrieved by the said order, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was moved before this Court.3. I have perused the affidavit, counter affidavit and rejoinder ...
Shankar Dayal Tewari and Vs. the Deputy Director of Consolidation and
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)AWC2466
S.N. Srivastava, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 21.12.2005, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur allowing the application to withdraw revision to avail alternative remedy of appeal.2. The facts of the case are that against an order passed by the Consolidation Officer, Opposite Party No. 2 preferred a revision. Subsequently he was advised to file an appeal. Opp. Party No. 2 then filed an appeal before the Appellate authority and also moved an application before the Deputy Director of Consolidation to permit to withdraw the revision to persue his remedy in Appeal which was allowed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. This order is impugned in the present writ petition.3. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners urged that there was no provision under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act under which Deputy Director of Consolidation could grant such permission to wit...
Highland Distilleries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: (2006)2CompLJ455(All); [2007]76SCL352(All)
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri R.P. Agarwal--learned Counsel for petitioner. The Official Liquidator, U.P. at Allahabad and Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Companies Affairs, PDIL Bhawan, A-14, Sector -I, Noida (UP) have filed their representations.2. On 8.11,2005, the Court passed following orders on the application under Section 391 /394 of Companies Act, 1956;This is an application under Section 391/394 of the Companies Act, 1956 3 for approving scheme of amalgamation of transferor? companies 1 to 5 with Shaw Wallace Distillers Ltd. with its registered office at Udyog Bhawan, 2nd Floor, 29 Walchand Hira Chand Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, transferee company.It is stated that all the five transferor companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of the transferor companies and that all transferors and transferee companies have resolved in the meeting of board of directors to amalgamate.A supplementary affidavit has been filed stating in para 3 that the liabilities of the com...
Chemical Workers Union Through Shri Virendra Garg, Member, Executive C ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)AWC2971; [2006(109)FLR533]
Shishir Kumar, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for setting aside the award dated 22.12.1995 published on 27.9.1997 in Adjudication Case No. 253 of 1987 and further prayer is for commanding the Labour Court to treat the termination of the services of the 12 workmen w.e.f. 12.3.1987 and to rehear the matter of dispute and decide the same on the basis of the dismissal having taken place on 12.3.1987. The writ petition has been filed on behalf of one Sri Virendra Garg, Member, Executive Committee of the Chemical Works Union, 231, Lal Jhanda Bhavan, Ambedkar Road, Ghaziabad against the award dated 22.12.1995 by which the claim of the workmen has not been accepted by the Labour Court.2. The facts arising out of the writ petition are that the workmen who are working under respondent No. 2, there was some dispute and they went on strike and then they have stated that they wanted to join from 12.11.1987 but the employer has not permitted them to join the duties as such the dispute arose....
Smt. Bundoo Devi Vs. Raj Bahadur and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC3224
ORDERS.P. Mehrotra, J.1. Civil Misc. Application No. 2800 of 1994 (dated 29.7.1994), has been filed on behalf of the defendants-respondents Nos. 1 and 2, inter alia, praying that the second appeal be dismissed as having abated.2. The application is accompanied by an affidavit of Raj Bahadur (defendant-respondent No. 1), sworn on 14.7.1994.3. In the said affidavit, it is, inter alia, stated that Smt. Bundoo Devi (plaintiff-appellant) expired in the year 1989, but no substitution application for bringing on record her heirs and legal representatives has as yet been filed.4. The aforesaid application was filed after serving a copy thereof in the Office of Sri M. A. Qadeer, learned Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant on 15.7.1994.5. No reply has been filed to the aforesaid application, nor has any substitution application been filed on behalf of the heirs and legal representatives of the said Smt. Bundoo Devi (plaintiff-appellant).6. As will be evident from a perusal of the order sheet of ...
Smt. Maya Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-06-2006
Reported in: (2006)(3)SLJ396CAT
1. The grievance of the applicant in this case is that she has been subjected to transfer from KVS Allahabad to KVS Neemuch, invoking the provisions of Clause 18(b) of the guidelines for transfer.2. For the purposes of ready reference, the said provisions of Clause 18(b) together with Clauses 17(iv) and (b) referred to therein is reproduced below: 17(iv) In cases of fresh posting on direct recruitment, unless they complete a period of stay of three years and in case of female employees, one year of stay at the place of posting, their request for posting to choice place will not be considered". "17(v)In cases of promotion, unless he complete one year of stay at his place of posting, request for posting to his choice place will not be considered". "18(b)The Commissioner will be competent to make such departure from the guidelines, as he may consider necessary, with the prior approval of the Chairman, K.V.S. However, such departure will be considered only after the disposal of the cases ...
irshad Ahmad S/O Mohd. Ibrahim Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-06-2006
Reported in: 2006(1)AWC908
Amar Saran, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.2. This revision has been filed against the judgment of the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Shaharanpur dated 10.9.1985 dismissing an appeal from an order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Shaharanpur dated 31.10.1983. By the said order, the A.D.M. had confiscated the vehicle and in lieu of the confiscation the revisionist was allowed to pay Rs. 40,000/-. That order has been challenged in the present case.3. The facts of this case were that in the intervening night of 11/12.9.1981 police of P.S. Manglaur arrested four persons including one Sanawar Khan, the driver of the truck No. URM 91 and from the truck in question 39 bags of Bhang weighing 12 quintal were found. The other accused persons, but not the revisionist were present on the spot. The revisionist is said to be the owner of the truck. The Arrested persons were challaned under Section 60 of the U.P. Excise Act ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »