Allahabad Court September 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Arya Mahila Hitkarini Maha Parishad Vs. Registrar, Banaras Hindu ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2005
Reported in: AIR2005All371
ORDERArun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Gajendra Pratap Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri V.K. Upadhyaya Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri S.D. Shukla Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and the Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6.2. Shri Arya Mahila Hitkarini Maha Parishad, Lahurabir, Varanasi, is a society duly registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Petitioner No. 2, Ram Janam Rai, claims himself to be the old trustee and life member of Shri Arya Mahila Hitkarini Maha Parishad, Lahurabir, Varanasi (society). The said society runs and manages various educational institutions including Degree College and Inter College at Varanasi. The dispute giving rise to the present writ petition is confined to management of Arya Mahila Degree College, Chetanganj, Varanasi. The aforesaid degree college is affiliated to Banaras Hindu University in accordance with the provisions of Banaras Hindu...
Narendra Singh Rana, Ips, Jt. Commissioner of Police (P and I) Vs. Sta ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2005
Reported in: 2005CriLJ231
1. Heard Sri A.K. Misra, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.S. Hajela, learned counsel for the C.B.I, and Sri Surendra Singh, learned A.G.A.-I and also perused the materials on record.2. This petition has been brought for quashing the written report registered at Case Crime No.332/05 under Sections 218, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC read with Section 13(1D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act at P.S. Garh Mukteshwar, Ghaziabad. Simultaneously the liberty of the petitioner by way of staying his arrest is desired to be protected. It is said that the petitioner is the senior IPS officer and presently working as Joint Commissioner of Police (P & I), Police Headquarters, New Delhi and has falsely been roped into the above offences so as to harass and harm his reputation. His father late Brig. Tej Singh (Retd.), who was decorated with Vishistha Sewa Medal, set up a family charitable trust known as 'Sri Ganga Sanatan Dharmarth Trust' (the Trust) of which the petitioner is one of the...
Surendra Singh S/O Bhimmi Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2005
Reported in: 2006CriLJ700
Amar Saran, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the, conviction of the appellant Surendra Singh under Section 376 I.P.C. to 14 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and 5 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. l,000/-under Section 3(2)(v) of the S.C./S.T. Act. In default of payment of fine under Section 376 I PC, three years simple imprisonment was awarded and for non-payment of fine under Section 3(2)(v) of S.C./S.T. Act, one year simple imprisonment was also awarded. The sentences were concurrent.2. I have heard Sri V.M. Zaidi, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant and the learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.3. The prosecution case as mentioned in the F.I.R. was that on 27.4.1999 at 2 p.m., a person selling carrots and salt was roaming around the village. At that time, the victim girl (name not disclosed) aged 10 years was tempted with the carrots and the appellant took her towards the field of Brijendra Singh in village Inguri and committed rape on the girl, who was the niece of the inf...
Umesh Kumar Gupta Son of Late Shri Khan Chandra Gupta Vs. State of U.P ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2005
Reported in: AIR2006All30; 2006(2)AWC1394; IV(2006)BC239
Janardan Sahai, J.1. The petitioner had taken a loan from the Punjab National Bank. The case of the petitioner is that the loan was secured by a mortgage by deposit of title deeds on 13.11.2004 and to evidence this transaction the petitioner executed a document titled as 'Memorandum of Mortgage by way of deposit of title deed' on 12.1.2005, The question in this case is whether this instrument dated 12.1.2005 is a mortgage deed covered under Article 40(b) of Schedule 1 B of the Indian Stamp Act or is it an agreement relating to the deposit of title deeds covered under Article 6 of Schedule 1-B, The revenue authorities treating the instrument as a mortgage deed have found that there is a deficiency of Rs. 4,90,000/- instamp duty and have also imposed penalty of like amount and interest of Rs..14,700/-. 2. Section 2(17) of the Indian Stamp.Act defines a mortgage-deed. It is quoted hereunder:-'2. Definitions. - In this Act, unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context - XX...
Shri J.C. Thind, Son of Shri L.R. Thind Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Thro ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)AWC256
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the Memorandum dated 19.7.2005, issued by the Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs, Lodhi Road, New Delhi (Annex. 35).2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the petitioner, at present, is posted at Anpara, District Sonebhadra, (U.P.). However, respondents have initiated the domestic inquiry against the petitioner under the provisions of Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964; and Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. Charge-sheet contains four charges in respect of transportation of sleepers of Devdar from Uri to Delhi between 23.10.2002 to 13.6.2004 by government vehicles. The Drivers carrying the said sleepers in the Government , vehicles were arrested, sleepers were seized etc. etc. The present petition has been filed for quashing the said charge-sheet.3. Shri Shashank Sheikhar Singh, learned coun...
ishwar Chandra Srivastava S/O Late M.P. Srivastava Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2005
Reported in: [2005(107)FLR1015]
V.M. Sahai and Sabhajeet Yadav, JJ.1. The petitioner was appointed as Head Assistant on 6.5.1973 in the office of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd., Naini Unit, Naini, Allahabad (in brief ITI). In the High School Certificate 18.4.1944 had been mentioned as his date of birth. He was promoted from time to time. The Personnel Manager, ITI issued a letter to the petitioner on 31.8.2002 that he would superannuate on the same day. The last pay drawn by the petitioner was Rs. 15800/- per month. The petitioner filled Form 10-D under the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 and submitted it in the office of Secretary, Provident Fund Trust-II, ITI on 13.9.2002 wherein his date of birth was mentioned as 18.8.1944 and his date of superannuation was mentioned as 31.8.2002. The Secretary, Provident Fund Trust forwarded all the papers of the petitioner on 1.12.2002 to the Assistant Commissioner in the office of Deputy Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Varanasi (in brief the Assistant Commissioner) stati...
Galaxy Indo Fab Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2005
Reported in: 2006(193)ELT413(All)
Rajes Kumar, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 17-8-2005 passed on the application under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') the Act, by which Tribunal has directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1 crore within eight weeks as pre-deposit.2. Heard Shri Pankaj Bhatia and Shri Amit Awasthi, learned Counsels for the petitioners and Sri Shambhu Chopra, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.3. With the consent of both the parties, present writ petition is being disposed of at this stage.4. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner are engaged in the proc essing of grey fabrics. The officers of Revenue department visited the premises of the petitioners on 18-11-1998 and certain private records were seized. It is alleged that some unaccounted grey fabrics and semi-processed finished fabrics were recovered from the premises. On the basis of material found at the time of search, it has been infer...
Escorts Finance Ltd. Vs. Secur Industries Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2005
Reported in: [2006]131CompCas608(All)
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri Diptiwan Singh holding brief for Ms. Bharti Sapru and Shri R, P. Agarwal assisted by Shri Pawan Kumar, advocate.2. This winding up petition was filed in the year 1997, to wind up Secur Industries Ltd. for failing to pay Rs. 5 lakhs towards dishonoured cheque. A statutory notice dated July 20, 1976, sent to the respondent-company at its registered office, was served upon the respondent-company.3. Counter affidavit, rejoinder affidavit and thereafter, supplementary counter and rejoinder affidavit have been filed.4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner-company entered into an arrangement of bill discounting service by which it discounted the hundis issued by the respondent-company towards supply of materials. Under this arrangement, the petitioner-company agreed to discount the bills, and thereafter, to collect the amount on the presentation of hundis to the respondent-company after the expiry of its period for payment. A 90 days disc...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vidyawati and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2005
Reported in: II(2006)ACC29
Gokal Chand Mital, J.1. Heard (earned Counsel for the parties.2. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned Counsel for the respondent that this appeal has been filed challenging the quantum of compensation without any permission as contemplated by Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act. In support of contention reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Nicolletta Rohtagi and Ors. III (2002) ACC 292 (SC) : 2003 (3) T.A.C. 293 S.C.3. Admittedly, no permission has been granted by the Tribunal under Section 170 of the Act.4. In view of the aforesaid decision of the Apex Court this First Appeal from order is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed....
Ganga Ram Son of Samanta Ram and Smt. Champa Devi W/O Ishwari Prasad V ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-19-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD(Cri)30; 2006CriLJ687
Poonam Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri V.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.2. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 1.5.2002 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 4th, Mathura in case No. 116 of 1998, under Sections 304B, 201 I.P.C. Police Station Math, District Mathura.3. The facts giving rise to the dispute is that a first information report was registered at case crime No. 1 16 of 1998, under Sections 304B, 201 I.P.C. Police Station Math, Sub District Math, District Mathura against the husband and other family members. On the basis of investigation, the Investigating Officer submitted a final report on 1.10.1998 which has been annexed as Annexure-5 to the affidavit. Notice was issued to the complainant-opposite party No. 2 He filed protest petition and affidavits. The Magistrate by means of the impugned order rejected the final report and summoned the accused in exercise of under Section 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »