Allahabad Court May 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravindra Nath Mishra, S/O Late Sri Mangla Mishra Vs. District Inspecto ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)AWC3394
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel.2. Sri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, District Inspector of School, Varanasi and Dr. Vimal Shankar Srivastava, Joint Director (Treasury & Pension), Varanasi Division, Varanasi, are present in person and have filed their affidavits in compliance with the order dated 7.4.2005 by which they were required to show cause as to why the interim mandamus dated 4.3.2002, as confirmed on 5.5.2003, has not been complied with and the pensionary benefits were not paid to the petitioner.3. The petitioner was appointed as Clerk in the office of District Inspector of School in the year 1962. He retired on 31.1.2001, while serving as Senior Assistant Clerk in the same office.4. By this write petition, filed on 25.2.2002, the petitioner has prayed fir payment of retrial dues, including pension gratuity, leave encashment, travelling allowance etc.5. A letter dated 17.4.2001 was issued by the Joint Director (Treasury & Pension), Va...
Dwarika Prasad Pandey, Manager, Junior High School, Known as Shri Chan ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)ESC1529
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for enforcing the Government Orders dated 12.8.1981, 4.12.1984 and 18.3.1985, which place a restriction in opening a new school within 5 Kms. Area of another established and recognised school. The present petitioner claims to be the Manager of the school, which stood established long back in district Kaushambi and has been recognised. The present petition has been filed for restraining the respondent authorities from establishing any other school within 5 Kms. area, and for that purpose, an order dated 23rd April, 2004 has been passed by the respondent no. 5, namely, the District Basic Education Officer, Kaushambi restraining the other persons from raising the construction of school on the representation made by. the petitioner. However as the said order is not being complied with, this petition has been filed.2. Sri D.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as there is a school established by the petitioner ...
Indian Overseas Bank Through Its Authorised Signatury Chief Manager Vs ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: [2005(107)FLR268]; (2006)ILLJ630All
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri A. B. Saran, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Parmatma Rai Advocate on behalf of the petitioner and Sri K.P. Agarwal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Kumari Sumati Rani Gupta Advocate on behalf of respondents.2. Indian Overseas Bank Limited through its authorized signatory has filed this writ petition against the award of the Labour Court Kanpur dated 02.09.2004 passed in Industrial Dispute No. 51 of 2000. Under the award the workman, Sri S.P. Tripathi has been directed to be reinstated in service with back wages from the date the reference was so made with continuity of service. The facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows.3. Sri S.P. Tripathi, respondent No. 1, was appointed to work as Bill Collector in the respondent-bank at Kanpur Branch. Sri S.P. Tripathi was required to collect the instalments from the small borrowers from the place of their business/residence and to make entries in their pass books after collecting the money and to deposi...
Ram Kishan S/O Gulab Singh Vs. Shiv Ram Son of Beniram and the New Ind ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)AWC2187
K.N. Ojha, J.1. Heard Sri R.K. Porwal learned counsel for the appellant and have gone through the record.2. All the above three appeals have been filed against common judgment and award dated 3.2.05 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Etawah (Spl. Judge D.A.A.) in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 342 of 1993 Sheo Ram v. Ram Kishan whereby an award of Rs. 27000/- alongwith interest @ 6% per annum has been made in favour of Sheo Ram, Motor Claim Case No. 311 of 1993 Santosh Kumar v. Ram Kishan wherein an award of Rs. 13,000/- alongwith 6 % interest has been made in favour of Santosh Kumar, in Motor Claim Case No. 343 of 1993 Kishan Singh v. Ram Kishan wherein an award of Rs. 15000/- alongwith 6% interest has been made in favour of Shri Krishan. In all these Claim Petitions award has been made against the owner of the vehicle Ram. Kishan who is appellant in this case but a direction has been made that Opposite party No. 2 the New India Assurance Company, Etawah will make payment of ...
Narendra Kumar Son of Late Ram Manohar and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pra ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2005
Reported in: [2006(106)FLR502]; (2005)2UPLBEC1727
1. The appeal is taken up and summarily disposed of. The appellant-writ petitioners were issued letters of ad-hoc appointment but they filed the writ for the purpose of continuing to work. The term of appointment on the ad-hoc basis ran out on 17th February, 2004; when they were stopped from discharging their duty, they came to Court.2. We are in respectful agreement with the order passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarun Agarwal dated 12th April, 2004 where by his Lordship has held that the writ petitioners were not entitled to any relief and they had no right to hold their respective posts3. We assume for the purposes of this appeal, though the Hon'ble Judge has held otherwise in the court below, that he posts were in the nature of substantive permanent vacancies. However, it is the admitted position that though the selection committee after advertisement had recommended appointments with a probationary period, the appointing authority chose quite a different procedure and issued ad-hoc l...
Om Prakash Ojha Son of Sri Ram Sewak Vs. State of U.P.,
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2005
Reported in: (2005)2UPLBEC1724
D.P. Singh, J.1. This writ petition is directed against a termination order dated 30.6.1986 as upheld by the appellate order dated 16.4.1991.2. This case was taken up on several occasions but none appeared on behalf of the respondent Corporation. On the request of the court Sri Sameer Sharma, who though normally appears for the Corporation but had not been instructed in this case, was asked by the court to assist it. The court expresses its gratitude for his appearance herein.3. The petitioner was a conductor in the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and while he was conducting a bus from Agra to Delhi having obtained the waybill from Idgah Depot, Agra, a checking party of the Corporation intercepted the bus on 30.9.1984 at 10.40 A.M. It found that some passengers were traveling without tickets and fake tickets were also being used by the petitioner and as such he was removed from service vide order dated 1.10.1984 and four specific charges were framed against him. After due enquiry...
Sampurnand Sanskrit University through It's Registrar Vs. State of U.P ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ESC2412
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. The Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi (in short the University) and the students who have been awarded 'Shiksha Shastri' degree by the University, which is the examining body, from the Faculty of Education of the University at Varanasi, and five affiliated Colleges namely (1) Sri Adarsh Bharati Mahavidyalaya Ketasarai, Jaunpur, (2) Shrimat Paramhans Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya Teekar Mafi, Sultanpur, (3) Shri Sachcha Adhyatma Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Jhunsi, Allahabad and (5) Sri Mahaveer Vidyapith Pachhami Vihar, New Delhi, have filed these writ petitions with prayers to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to treat their certificates or 'Shiksha Shastri' as equivalent to B.Ed, for the purpose of admission to the Special B.T.C. Course, 2004 designed by the State Government with the approval of the National Council of Teachers' Education for the purpose of employment as Assistant Teachers in Basic Schools in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Universi...
Mannu @ Ayyub S/O Late Ghirau Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2005
Reported in: 2005CriLJ3469
Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.1. All the above appeals have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 24.3.2004 passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 1, Kanpur Nagar, whereby the appellants are convicted under Section 364A I.P.C. and sentenced to death and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each. In default of payment of fine further imprisonment for one year has been awarded. The appellants are further convicted under Section 201 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment of 7 years each and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine six months further imprisonment. The appellants are further convicted under Section 302/34 I.P.C. but they have not been awarded any other sentence of imprisonment. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.2. Criminal Reference No. 7 of 2004 is for confirmation of death sentence.3. Brief facts of the case, mentioned in the first information report lodged by Gulab Singh Bhadoria, informant, are that he is resident of House No. ...
Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Compa ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)AWC2832; I(2006)BC261
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Amit Negi Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri P.K. Bisaria Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 1, Bank, Sri K.M. Asthana Advocate on behalf of respondents Nos. 2 and 3, Sri Ashok Bhatnagar Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 4 and Sri S.D. Singh Advocate on behalf of Hina Builders seeking impleadment/intervention.2. M/S Scientific Instrument Company Limited, the petitioner, is a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act. Proceedings under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (Act No. 51 of 1993) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were initiated by the Bank of India (respondent No. 1) against the petitioner. The aforesaid proceedings were initiated before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Jabalpur. However, with the creation of the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Allahabad the said proceedings were transferred to Allahabad and were registered as T.A. No. ...
Himma, Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2005
Reported in: 2005CriLJ4200
Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 29.4.1981 passed by X Addl. Sessions Judge, Kanpur in S.T. No. 291 of 1979 whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment life and appellant Laxmi Narain was further convicted under Section 436 I.P.C. and sentenced to 'five years rigorous imprisonment alongwith one Himma who was convicted under Section 302/34 I.P.C. His appeal is abated since he was reported to be dead.2. The brief facts of the Case mentioned in the first information report lodged by Dwarik r/o Dullapurwa Magra Gadanpurwa, P.S. Bilhore, District Kanpur to the effect that his fields are adjoining to his house. There were Jundhari. and Arhar crops in the fields. Accused Radhey, Laxmi Narain and Himma always got his field grazed. On the date of occurrence they had again left their cattle to graze the field and he asked Himma to tie his cattle. On this Himma came out with h...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »