Allahabad Court May 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
U.P., B.Ed. Prashikshan Sangh Sathian Vs. High Court of Judicature at ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-24-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2779
M. Katju, J.1. This special appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned single Judge, dated 9.2.20042. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record.3. A large number of writ petitions were filed questioning the G.O. dated 2.7.2003, whereby it was provided that for the session 2003-04, 85% of the seats would be filled through the State agency and the remaining 15% by the management of the respective institutions in accordance with the guidelines that may be issued by the concerned University. The aforesaid Government order dated 2.7.2003 further provided that the upper limit of fees that could be charged by the colleges was Rs. 13,000. However, in case a higher fee was to be charged then the concerned institution could submit its proposal to a committee which had been constituted by the State Government and after examining the facts the said committee could grant permission to the college to charge higher fee, if it considered the ...
Keshaw Kumar and anr. Vs. U.P. Khadi and Village Industries and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-24-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2765
ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Sri K. D. Tripathi learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners-plaintiffs and Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.2. Petitioners-plaintiffs by means of present writ petition has challenged the order passed by the trial court, whereby the trial court has refused to grant temporary injunction to the plaintiffs to the effect that no recovery shall be made by selling or auctioning the property in question which was admittedly mortgaged with the defendants, who have advanced a loan of Rs. five lacs, forty thousand and odd to Sri Pratap Singh. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners approached the lower appellate court. The lower appellate court maintained the order passed by the trial court and dismissed the appeal. These two orders impugned in the present writ petition, which have been challenged by the petitioners in this petition.3. The petitioners case is that they are neither the loaner, nor guarantor and that t...
Smt. Prema Devi and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar Seth and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-24-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ARC550; 2004(4)AWC3528
Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. The Civil Second Appeal No. 585 of 1977 and Second Appeal No. 596 of 1977 have been filed against the same judgment and decree of the court below. Hence, they are heard together. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant Sri D. C. Mukharji in Second Appeal No. 585 of 1977 and Sri R. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent as well as Shri P. L. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent in Second Appeal No. 596 of 1977.2. The controversy for adjudication in two second appeals relates to two houses belonging to one late Sri Govind Prasad. The first house is situated at Railway Ganj, Central Bank Road, Hardoi and another house is situated at Railway Ganj, Vaish Pathshala Road. Hardoi. The undisputed factual matrix of the case is that late Sri Govind Seth was having four sons, namely, Kanhaiye Lal, Nanhey Lal, Ram Narayan and Ram Lal. Shri Kanhaiya Lal was having one son, namely, Ashok Kumar and Shri Nanhey Lal was bachelor.3. Sri Ashok Kumar son of late ...
Dy. Controller, Civil Defence Vs. Mohd. Afzuallah and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-24-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)AWC3584
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The respondent Nos. 1 to 6 are the owners and landlord of a double storied building situate in Mohalla Meena Bazar, Gorakhpur. The petitioner being a department of the State of U. P., was in occupation of the building in question, as a tenant, on a monthly rent of Rs. 268.75 p. It was alleged that the building in question is a double storied building having big halls and was spacious and contained all the amenities. The respondent filed an application under Section 21 (8) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972. praying that they are entitled to an enhancement of the monthly rent to the extent of l/12th of 10% of the market value of the building under the tenancy of the petitioner. In support of their application, the respondent submitted a detailed valuation report with regard to the market value of the building in question. This valuer was duly approved by the Central Government. This report of the valuer was duly submitted by an affidavit of the valuer. In this report the m...
Ram Kumar and anr. Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-24-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ2015
1. These two appellants have been convicted under Section 302/34 of I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, for committing murder of Kanhaiya Lal Rastogi on 20-5-1978 at about 9.15 p.m. within the limits of Mohalla Peerbukhara, Police Station Chowk, District Lucknow.2. In brief, the case was that on 20-5-1978 at 9.15 p.m. while the deceased Kanhaiya Lal Rastogi accompanied by his wife Savitri Devi (P.W. 1) was on way back to his house, that these two appellants, namely, Ram Kumar and Ram Chandra and one Sohan Lal assaulted him near the house of Triloki Nath. It was stated that accused Ram Chandra caught hold of Kanhaiya Lal and accused Ram Kumar and Sohan Lal gave knife blows to him, as a result of which he sustained serious injuries. His wife Smt. Savitri Devi, with the help of others, shifted the injured to the Medical college, Lucknow, where he was admitted in emergency surgical ward at about 10.00 p.m. Dr. N.R. Singh (P.W.2), who examined him, found as many as 11 injuries on...
Kapoor Chand Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)AWC3466; [2004(102)FLR143]; (2004)2UPLBEC1644
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri R.N. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri G.K. Singh, Advocate,2. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, the Additional Advocate General representing the contesting respondent has also been heard.3. Perused the record.4. In Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 16166 of 1998, Kappor Chand v. State of U.P. and Ors., a question had arisen regarding the implications arising under the provisions of the U.P. Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992 and the implications arising under the provisions contained in Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules.5. It had been urged for the petitioner that under the provisions of U.P. Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules 1992, he was entitled to continue until he attained the age of 60 years and since the provisions contained in the aforesaid Rules did not provide for any pre-retirement assessment, he could not be retired prior to his attaining he age of superannuation on the basis of any such assessment. In other ...
Rakesh Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2234
Tarun Chatterjee, C.J.1. In these bunch of writ petitions, the notifications issued by the State Government on 13th January, 2004 in the exercise of power under Section 11 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Section 21 of U. P. General Clauses Act, 1904, are under challenge. By these notifications, nine districts of the State of Uttar Pradesh, namely : Hathras, Gautam Budh Nagar, Jyotiba Phule Nagar, Ambedkar Nagar, Sant Kabir Nagar, Auraiya, Chandauli, Kaushambi, Shrawasti and four Commissioner's Division, namely, Basti, Devipatan, Mirzapur, Saharanpur have been abolished. Since the language of all these notifications are practically similar, we feel it necessary to reproduce one of such notifications, which runs as under :NOTIFICATION'In exercise of the powers under Section 11 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (U. P. Act No. III of 1901) read with Section 21 of the Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 (U. P. Act No. I of 1904) and...
Raghunath Prasad Upadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2760
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard counsel for petitioner and Sri U. C. Misra for respondent No. 4. Learned standing counsel appears for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.2. The petitioner was appointed on 1.11.1963 as Accountant In Nagar Panchayat, Fatehabad, District Agra. He retired on 31.12.2001. By this writ petition, he has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents to pay post retiral benefits including gratuity, G.P.F., arrears of revised salary, leave encashment, bonus, dearness allowance, group insurance policy and pension with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. It Is contended that the petitioner made several representations, first of which was given on 25.2,2002 to the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Fatehabad, district Fatehabad but the amount was not paid. Counsel for petitioner states that no dues certificate was issued to the petitioner, and that no disciplinary case is pending against him. The Assistant Director, Local Bodies Accounts Examination Department, U. P., A...
Hridayanand Pandey and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2798
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri A. K. Pandey, L. R. Khan and Sri Niranjan Kumar Verma for petitioners and Sri Sabhajeet Yadav for U. P. Jal Nigam.2. The petitioners are employees engaged by the Piece Rate Worker (P.R.W.) of the Constructions and Design Services of U. P. Jal Nigam in its various units. By these writ petitions they have prayed for writs of mandamus commanding the respondents not to discontinue their services ; to regularise their services like regular employee of U. P. Jal Nigam and its unit named as Construction and Design Services, and to pay wages in regular pay scales.3. The U. P. Jal Nigam has been constituted under Section 14 of the U. P. Water Supply Sewerage Act, 1975. The Constructions and Design Service of U. P. Jal Nigam is a separate and independent wing of U. P. Jal Nigam to function on commercial basis, and to undertake various constructions works in the State of U. P. on the pattern of U. P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Limited. The Constructions and Design Services...
Surendra Nath Singh Vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission a ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2794
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Surendra Nath Singh, seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the selection dated 3rd August, 1996, made by the U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission, Allahabad, respondent No. 1, filed as Annexure-11 to the writ petition insofar as it relates to the post of the Principal of Krishak Inter College, Thana Gaddi, district Jaunpur and other consequential reliefs.2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as follows :'In the district of Jaunpur, there is an Intermediate College in the name of Krishak Inter College (hereinafter referred to as 'the College') situate at Thana Gaddi. It is a recognised institution and receives grant-in-aid from the State Government. It is governed by the provisions of the U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and the regulations framed thereunder as also the U. P. Seco...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »