Allahabad Court September 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax and anr. Vs. Ajai Singh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-25-2002
Reported in: (2002)3UPLBEC2772
G.P. Mathur, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing the Judgment and order dated 2.4.1998 passed in O.A. No. 1273 of 1973 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad.2. Ajai Singh, respondent No. 1 to the writ petition, was appointed as a casual IVth Class employee in the office of the Commissioner, Income Tax, Allahabad, on 7.9.1994, and his services were terminated on 4.11.1997. He challenged termination of his service by filing an Original Application. The Tribunal held that as the services of respondent No. 1 had been terminated on account of non-satisfactory work, it was incumbent upon the writ petitioner to hold a formal departmental enquiry and as the same was not done, the termination of his services was illegal.3. We have heard Sri Amit Sthalekar for the petitioners, Sri O.P. Gupta for respondent No. 1 and have perused the record.4. It may be stated at the very outset that before the Tribunal Ajai Singh neither filed co...
Pradeep Kumar JaIn Alias Babbe Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ682
ORDERR.K. Dash, J. 1. The petitioner is one of the accused in case crime No. 205 of 1998 under Section 302/120B I.P.C., P.S. M.M. Gate, District Agra. In the said case, police after investigation has laid chargesheet against him and four others. By filing the present case, he has prayed for quashing of the chargesheet in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr. P. C.2. One Ved Prakash Sharma lodged FIR alleging that on 25-11-1995 at about 7.20 P.M. while he was sitting in the office of his brother Hari Ram Sharma (hereinafter referred to 'the deceased'), four unknown persons being armed arrived there and indiscriminately fired at the deceased, as a result he dropped down there. When many persons from the nearby came on the spot the criminals made good their escape. It is stated that since the informant and others had seen the culprits with the help of electric light, they could be able to identify them. The persons present and the informant removed the deceased to the hospital where he ...
C.L. Sagar (Advocate) Vs. Ms. Mayawati, D/O Sri Prabhu Dayal and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ690
ORDERR.K. Dash, J.1. Ms Mayawati, respondent No. 1, was the Vice-President and petitioner was a member of Bahujan Samaj Party at the relevant time. The petitioner lodged a cornplaint bearing No. 5278 of 1997 in the Court of C.J.M., Bareilly against respondent No. 1 and another alleging that on 21-3-1996 respondent No. 1 came to Amla-Bareilly to hold public meeting. The petitioner met her in the circuit-house where she assured him of a party ticket to contest the Assembly election from Faridpur constituency on his paying rupees fifty thousand. He believed her and paid the amount. Subsequently, her Private Secretary R. K. Vidyarthi, the other accused issued him receipt acknowledging payment of the said amount. Respondent No. 1 also nominated him as the District President of Bahujan Samaj Party. On 22-8-1996 she came to Bareilly and demanded further sum of rupees ten thousand, to which the petitioner expressed his inability to pay. On his refusal, she became annoyed and in the public meet...
Vedi Ram Alias Medi Ram and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ1084
ORDERR.K. Dash, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the learned II Additional District Judge, Agra adding the petitioners as accused persons in S.T. No. 714 of 2000 in exercise of power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'the Code'), the petitioners have approached this Court by filing the present petition.2. Short facts as borne out from the materials on record are that Geeta Ram, respondent No. 2 lodged an FIR at Sadar P.S. Agra on the basis of which case crime No. 419 of 2000 under Sections 304B and 498A, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act was registered. The police after investigation laid charge sheet only against Khem Karan, husband of the Narayani Devi, the deceased. After commitment, the case was transferred to the Additional District Judge, Agra for disposal in accordance with law. In course of trial, the prosecution examined some witnesses who in their evidence implicated the petitioners in the alleged incident. In view of such evidence, the...
Narendra Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ1092
ORDERR.K. Dash, J.1. Challenge is made to the order dated 5th July, 1996 passed by the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad in Criminal Case No. 2 of 1995. whereby permission Was accorded to the Inspector, Anti-Corruption Department, Moradabad, respondent No. 2 for further investigation in case crime No. 1149 of 1994, under Section 120B/409/420/467/471/ I.P.C. read with Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, police station Civil Lines, district Moradabad.2. Short fact as borne out from the F.I.R., copy whereby at Annexure 1, is that two officials of the State Police named therein embezzled Government money by creating some forged documents. On the basis of the said report aforesaid case was registered and after investigation final report was laid. Before any order was passed on such report, a protest petition was filed by the informant and simultaneously respondent No. 2 moved an application seeking permission for further investigation pursuant to the Governm...
Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. District Magistrate and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2002
Reported in: (2002)3UPLBEC2707
M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition and the connected Writ Petition No. 37836 of 2002, are being disposed of by a common Judgment.2. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned recovery certificate issued by the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, UP. Power Corporation, Fatehpur dated 17.7.2002 as well as the citation issued by the Tahsildar Sadar, Kanpur Nagar.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.4. The petitioner is Director of M/s. Sushila Alloys Pvt. Ltd., district Fatehpur which is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. The company applied for sanction of electricity connection which was sanctioned vide order dated 30.10.1995 Annexure-1 to the writ petition. An agreement was entered into between the petitioner and the U.P. State Electricity Board on 2.11.1996 and the supply was released on 8.11.1996 vide Annexure-2 to the writ petition. Bills were issued in the name of the company vide Annexure-4 to the writ petition.5. The Executive ...
Praveen Kumar Purwar Vs. Madhyamic Shiksha Parishad Through Its Secret ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2002
Reported in: (2003)1UPLBEC107
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter-alia, praying for the following reliefs :'(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' directing the respondent No. 1 to declare the petitioner's result of High School year 2002 as a fresh after getting English II Paper and Drawing paper valuated properly and justice be done;(b) a writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case;(c) award costs of the petition to the petitioner.'2. It is, inter-alia, alleged by the petitioner that the petitioner appeared in the High School Examination, 2002 as a regular student from D.A.V. Inter College, Orai at Jalaun. and that he was allotted Roll No. 998293 : and that the result of High School was declared on 18th March, 2002 but the result of the petitioner was shown as incomplete as the marks of English II Paper was not evaluated ; and that the petition...
Moel Joshwa Vs. Gorakhpur Development Authority and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-23-2002
Reported in: AIR2003All200
M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 25-7-2000 Annexure-10 to the writ petition passed by the respondent No. 2 and for a mandamus directing the respondent No. 1, Gorakhpur Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the 'GDA') to transfer and sell plots No. 644, 645 and 646 in Basharatpur, Gorakhpur to the petitioner at the rates already determined and to restrain the respondents 1 and 2 from transferring the plots to the respondents 3 to 5.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. It has been alleged in paragraph 2 of the writ petition that the aforementioned plots were purchased by the petitioner on 16-9-1968 vide sale deed Annexure-1 to the writ petition. These plots lie in the city of Gorakhpur and it is alleged in paragraph 3 of the writ petition that the petitioner's house is situate thereon alongwith a boundary wall.4. A notification dated 7-9-1983 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued and publishe...
Nagar Nigam Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2002
Reported in: (2003)1UPLBEC70
S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Present petition has been filed canvassing the validity of award delivered by the Labour Court on 28.2.1994 (Annexure 6 to the petition) attended with a further relief of mandamus restraining the Labour Court from implementing the award dated 28.2.1994.2. Matrix of the necessary facts as bear of the controversy involved in this petition is that Sri Prabhu Dayal, arrayed as respondent No. 5 in the present petition was engaged on daily wage basis on the post of clerk in the Accounts Department of the Nigam for a specified period i.e., 60 days with the stipulation that his services were liable to be terminated after expiry of the prescribed period at any time without assigning any reason in accordance with the private of contract between the Nagar Nigam and the respondent No. 5. It transpires from the record that the services of the petitioner were extended from time to time and each extension is stacked up back to back without there being any break and the extension...
Saraswati Vidya Mandir Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)AWC1917; (2002)3UPLBEC2777
A.K. Yog, J. 1. Heard Sri Shamim Ahmad, advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri G.K. Pandey, learned standing counsel, on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner before this Court is 'Saraswati Vidya Mandir Rewatlpur, district Ghazipur through its manager Smt. Ram Sakhi Devi' purporting to be an institution, called 'Saraswati Vidya Mandir Rewatipur', which is not a legal entity. 3. This Court in Writ Petition No. 10663 of 1976, Sardar Patel Higher Secondary School, Dev Nagar, Mathura v. Deputy Director of Education, Agra Region, Agra and Ors., 1976 AWC 18, vide judgment and order dated 1.3.1976 observed : 'Sri N.C. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Babu Lal Sharma raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the petition at the instance of the manager Kedar Nath. He urged that the Committee of Management had authority to hold enquiry and to dismiss the petitioner from service, its proposal to dismiss respondent No. 3 was disapproved by the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »