Allahabad Court September 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kunwarpal Sharma and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2003All7
G.P. Mathur, J.1. Who is liable to pay the stamp duty on a deed of conveyance of immovable property is the question which requires consideration here.2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing of the proceedings initiated against the petitioners in pursuance of recovery certificate dated 12-3-1997 issued by ADM (Finance and Revenue) for recovery of Rs. 96,400/-towards deficiency of stamp duty. The learned standing counsel was granted time on 28-3-2001 and on several occasions thereafter to file counter affidavit but no counter affidavit has been filed. Since the issue involved is a purely legal one, the writ petition has been finally heard with the consent of the parties. 3. A sale deed of certain agricultural plots owned by the petitioners was executed on 2.5.1996 in favour of M/s Reliance Farms Limited a company having its office at 94, Indra Nagar, Bareilly, and the deed was registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Khair, district Aligar...
Badri Prasad Vs. Babu Lal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2003All206
1. This is the second civil appeal against the judgment and decree dated 10-11-1978 passed by the then learned IV Additional District Judge, Unnao, dismissing the appeal and confirming the Judgment and decree passed by the then learned trial Court. The suit was for cancellation of sale deed. 2. The following question of law has been formulated in this second appeal :-- 'Whether the findings recorded by the Courts below are perverse and illegal?'3. I have heard the arguments and have gone through the record, 4. The brief facts of suit No. 36 of 1969 are that Babu Lal, respondent filed a suit, in the Court of Munsif South. Unnao with the allegations that he was the owner of the disputed hquse No. 94 (old) and 97 (new) situate in Mohalla Bastania Talab alias Narendra Nagar, City Unnao. The plaintiff further alleged that Badri Prasad was his tenant for five years on monthly rent of Rs. 15/-. One room in the upper floor of this house remain in possession of the plaintiff in which the plaint...
Rajendra Lal Srivastava Vs. Secondary Education Service Commission and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)AWC1434
G.P. Mathur, J. 1. This matter has come before us in order to resolve the conflict of opinions in two decisions rendered by learned single Judges of this Court.2. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner who was Principal of an intermediate college. A charge-sheet was served upon him on 15.7.1993 and he was required to appear before the enquiry committee constituted by the Committee of Management of the Institution. After conclusion of the enquiry, the Committee of Management of the Institution passed a resolution proposing his dismissal from service. The resolution was sent to U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) for grant of approval. The Commission sent a notice to the petitioner requiring him to send his reply. He was afforded an opportunity of hearing by a single member subcommittee of the Commission. Thereafter, the Commission passed an order on 17.7.1995 approving the proposal of the Committee of Manageme...
Sant Das Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ3424
ORDERU.S. Tripathi, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issue of writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 8-8-2002 passed by the Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in Criminal Misc. Case No. 69 of 2002, for issue of writ or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the petitioner as juvenile and for issue of writ or direction of mandamus commanding the respondents to lodge the petitioner in Child Care Home as provided under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and to pass order releasing the petitioner from jail.2. The facts giving rise to this writ petition in short, are that on 9-6-2002 one Amar Singh lodged an F.I.R. against the applicant at Police Station, Dhata, District Fatehpur with the allegation that on 9-6-2002 at about 7.15 A.M. the applicant caused fire arm injury on Gulab Singh by a country made pistol, when the latter was cleaning his Maruti Van on the public hand pump in village Jam, P. S. Dhata. ...
Mahendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: (2002)3UPLBEC2737
Rakesh Tiwari, J. 1. The petitioner was appointed by the Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax, Meerut Range as Chowkidar on 4.4.1977. In 1978, he was transferred to Muzaffarnagar. When he had put in a continuous service of about 8 years, he all of a sudden was terminated from service on 21.1.1985 by the Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, respondent No. 2, inter alia, on the ground that his services were no longer required. The said order of termination has been appended as Annexure-4 to the writ petition.2. The petitioner moved a representation dated 15.6.1988 which was dismissed by the Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax, Saharanpur Range, Saharanpur, vide letter dated 27.12.1989. The matter did not rest there. The petitioner was served by an order dated 27.12.1989 issued by the Deputy Commissioner (Administration), Sales Tax, Saharanpur Range, Saharanpur in continuation to the letter dated 31.1.1985 of the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax, Muzaffarnagar Range, Muzaffarnagar. It was ...
Ram Pal Singh Vs. Sachiv, Garavpur Kisan Sewa Sahakari Samiti Limited ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: (2003)1UPLBEC77
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, interallia, challenging the order of termination dated 26th July, 2002 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.).2. From the allegations made in the writ petition, it appears that a surprise inspection of Kisan Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Garavpur was a made by the District Assistant Registrar, Sahkari Samiti, UP., Jotiba Phule Nagar, respondent No. 4 on 6.9.2001. The inspection report dated 6.9.2001 was submitted in this regard by the said District Assistant Registrar, Sahkari Samiti, UP., Jyotiba Phule Nagar, respondent No. 4. A copy of the said inspection report dated 6.9.2001 has been filed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition.3. Thereafter, a charge-sheet dated 24.12.2001 was served on the petitioner by the Secretary/Enquiry Officer, Garavpur Kisan Sewa Sahkari Samiti Limited, Tehsil Hassanpur, District Jotiba Phule Nagar. A copy of the said charge-sheet dated 24.12...
Prakash Talkies and ors. Vs. Nagar Palika Parishad and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)AWC3191; (2002)3UPLBEC2721
Sudhir Narain, J. 1. The petitioners seek to quash the Gazette notification dated July 29, 1995, enhancing show tax from Rs. 20 to Rs. 50 and the demand notices issued in pursuance thereof. 2. The petitioners are carrying on business of cinema. The Nagar Palika Parishad, Etawah (hereinafter referred to as the Parishad) had fixed Rs. 20 per show payable by the petitioners. The Parishad passed special resolution for enhancement of show tax from Rs. 20 to Rs. 50. A notice inviting objections was published in the newspaper 'Dainik Savera' dated 8.10.1-994. The Parishad passed resolution on 13.10.1994 that the show tax be enhanced from Rs. 20 to Rs. 50. They forwarded necessary papers to the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur, for sanction of the proposal. A notification dated 10th July, 1995 under Section 300 (1) of the Municipalities Act, 1960 (in short the Act) was published in the U. P. Gazette dated 6th May, 1995 by the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur, inviting objections for ...
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. U.P. Public Service Tribunal ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-03-2002
Reported in: [2001(88)FLR315]; (2003)IILLJ1119All
ORDER1. The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned order dated November 5, 1985 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition) passed by the U.P. Public Services Tribunal No. 5, Lucknow (respondent No. 1) allowing the claim petition filed by respondent No. 3 (hereinafter referred to as respondent) and setting aside the order of the petitioner-U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (in short the Corporation) dated April 21, 1977.2. Briefly stated the facts arc that the respondent Vijay Bahadur Singh was appointed as a driver in the erstwhile U.P. Government Roadways on March 19, 1971 on temporary basis and subsequent to creation of the Corporation with effect from June 1, 1972 he was sent on deputation with the Corporation vide Government Order dated January 5, 1972. By this Government order, all the employees/officers of the erstwhile U.P. Government Roadways were sent on deputation with the Corporation.3. The Zonal Manager (Central Zone, U.P.S.R.T.C.), Bareilly issued a direction vide letter dated ...
Kanishka Pandey Vs. Seth Anandram Jaipuria School and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-03-2002
Reported in: (2003)1UPLBEC214
S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to admit/re-admit the petitioner in Class XI and to pursue studies in Commerce side.2. There appears to be no dispute about the fact that the petitioner was admitted as a student in the respondents' School in Class 1st in the year 1992 and he continued there upto Xth standard. It is said that the petitioner has secured about 70% marks in the ISCE Examinations, 2002. After completion of Xth standard, the petitioner opted Commerce side in higher class and as the respondent's school although happened to be the first choice of the petitioner being reputed College, was not having studies in Commerce side, the petitioner had no option but to obtain transfer certificate from the aforesaid School on 6.7.2002. It is said that it is thereafter, the petitioner came to know that on 19.7.2002, respondents' School obtained permission and recognition to teach Commerce subject as well after IS...
Charan Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)AWC3175
N.K. Mehrotra, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing the order dated 5.3.2002 (Annexure-19 to the writ petition) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad, in Original Application No. 1174 of 1995, Charan Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., for quashing the order dated 4.10.1993 (Annexure-11 to the writ petition) and for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioners on account of their promotion to the post of Senior Wagon Repairers--Grade II with effect from the date mentioned in the promotion order dated 30.11.1992 and to give all consequential benefits and arrears of salary along with interest payable to the petitioners.2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners at length.3. The applicant Nos. 1 to 67 and husband of applicant No. 68 in Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal were selected as Trade Apprentices in Mechan...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »