Allahabad Court March 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surendra Kumar Pandey and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)AWC1191
M. Katju and S.K. Singh, JJ.1. By means of the writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to inform the vacancies to the respondent No. 2 for recommending the name of candidates from the watting list which is said to be maintained .2. The facts as stated in the writ petition are that for filling up different posts in the State of U. P. through the Combined State Upper Subordinate Examination, 1999, an advertisement was published in the daily newspaper dated 1.1.1999. The petitioners filled their forms for appearing in the said examination. In the final result so declared, petitioner No. 2 was finally selected and was allotted the post of Assistant Director (Industry) but petitioner No. 1 was not selected. It is stated in paragraph 11 of the writ petition that the State Government has issued two Government orders dated 29.8.1992 and 31.1.1994 for declaration of result, preparation of the waiting list...
Param Lal Verma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)AWC1158; (2002)2UPLBEC1114
M. Katju and S.K. Singh, JJ.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 29.8.2000 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition). A further prayer has been made to command the respondents to pay the post retiral benefits to the petitioner.2. The petitioner came in the service of the U.P. Public Works Department (in short P.W.D.) in the year 1964 as Overseer which was subsequently re-named as Junior Engineer. In due course of time, the petitioner got his promotion as Assistant Engineer in the year 1981 and thereafter, as Executive Engineer in the year 1994. While, the petitioner was working as Executive Engineer in the Constructions Division. Pokhri, district Chamoli. there were three Assistant Engineers under him Including one Mahesh Chandra. The petitioner was in charge of supervision of the amount of money as allocated and expenditure incurred by the different Assistant Engineers for the works, and in dis...
Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2918
J.C. Gupta, J.1. All the four above named appellants have been sentenced to death under Section 302 read with Section 149 I.P.C. for committing the murder of Surendra Singh son of Rajvir Singh aged about 26 years. Appellant Rakesh has further been sentenced to two years R.I. and fine of Rs.2000/- for causing injuries to Smt. Krishna Devi, P.W.2, the mother of deceased Surendra Singh.2. As per the prosecution case incident occurred on 13-6-1992 at about 8 p.m. near the house of Amilal in village Mithli within the area of police station Baghpat, which was then in District Meerut. Appellants Ram Kumar, Jai Prakash and Devesh Kumar were said to be armed with country made pistols while appellant Rakesh and co-accused Parvendra with PHARSA and SPEAR respectively. It is alleged that all the accused persons caused as many as 19 injuries to Surendra Singh from their respective weapons. Shrieks and cries of Surendra Singh attracted his mother Smt. Krishna Devi, P.W.2 and brother Udai Singh to th...
Ram Ratan Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2688
U.S. Tripathi, J. 1. Appellant Ram Ratan has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 29-3-1993 passed by Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur in Sessions Trial No. 339 of 1991 convicting the appellant under Section 323, 324 and 302, I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of 3 months under Section 323, I.P.C, R.I.for a period of one year under Section 324, I.P.C. and imprisonment for life under Section 302, I.P.C.2. Appellant Ram Ratan was the real brother of Ram Pal and Bheemsen (co-accused who had not appealed). Bheemsen was father's elder brother of Ram Avtar deceased. Maiku Lal (P.W.I) Ram Avtar deceased and Ram Ladete (P.W.2) were real brothers. They and the appellant Ram Ratan were residents of village Babunuwa, P.S. Tilhar, district Shahjahanpur. Houses of appellant and the deceased were previously one and subsequently partitioned and thee was an intervening wall between their houses. The house of appellant faced towards north i...
Arvind Kumar and Etc. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2898
J.C. Gupta, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 482 of 1981 has been filed by Arvind while Criminal Appeal No. 518 of 1981 is by accused Anil alias Pappu.2. Both of them have been convicted under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life by the then Vth Addl. Sessions Judge, Etawah in Sessions Trial No. 241 of 1980 by the judgment dated 25-2-1981.3. The prosecution case, as was set up in the F.I.R. lodged by Anil Prakash Shukla, P.W. 1, in short, was that about one and half years prior to the occurrence in question Atul Prakash Shukla, brother of first informant was beaten by accused Arvind Shukla and despite having assaulted him, accused Arvind tried to implicate Atul Prakash in a false case but could not succeed. Since then Atul Prakash Shukla and Arvind were on inimical terms. It was further alleged that on 21-10-1979 first informant Anil Prakash Shukla and his brother Atul, deceased of this case, were going to their residential house after taking a round in the market and when...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›