Allahabad Court February 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar Vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)AWC1062; (2002)2UPLBEC1433
M. Katju and S.K. Singh, JJ 1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for Issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the corrigendum published in the newspaper 'Dainik Jagran' dated 1.2.2000 limiting the consideration of physically handicapped candidates for the appointment of Executive Trainee only to the disciplines of Electrical/Mechanical Engineering (Annexure-10 to the writ petition). A further prayer has been made for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment as an Executive Trainee in Electronic discipline in pursuance of the corrigendum published in the newspaper 'Dainik Jagran' dated 1.2.2000 without subjecting the petitioner to a fresh written examination and to grant appointment to the petitioner as such. 2. The petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Caste and is a physicallydisabled person having suffered from Polio. True copies of the certificates in this eonnection are An...
Laxmirattan Cotton Mills Vs. Labour Court (iv), U.P., Kanpur and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)AWC1077; [2002(92)FLR1221]; (2002)2UPLBEC1425
Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-employer has challenged the award of the labour court dated 5.2.1996, Annexure-10 to the writ petition, in Adjudication Case No. 80 of 1989. The facts leading to the filing of present writ petition are that the State Government vide its order dated 14th June, 1989 as amended on 4.9.1989 referred the following dispute under Section 4K of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. 1947, for adjudication before the labour court.^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk vius Jfedv:.k izdk'k iq= Jh 'akdj yky in flfoy vksojfl;j dks muds dk;Z ds vuqlkj lgk;dvfHk;Urk dk inuke ,oa osrueku :- 650&1]200 u fn;k tkuk mfpr rFkk@vFkok oS/kkfud gS ;fn ugha rks lacaf/kr Jfed D;k ykHk@vuqrks'k fjyhQ ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS A fdl frfFk ls rFkk fdl vU; fooj.k lfgr ** 2. The parties have exchanged their written statements and rejoinder-affidavits and adduced their evidence. The labour court after considering the evide...
Algu Vs. District Magistrate and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)AWC2530; (2002)3UPLBEC2717
G. P. Mathur and R. B. Misra,JJ.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying that the order dated 7.7.1998 passed by District Magistrate, Azamgarh for recovery of amount of Rs. 78.278.52 p. from the petitioner as arrears of land revenue be quashed. A further prayer has been made that the respondents may be restrained from taking any coercive measure to recover the amount from the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was President of Nagar Panchayat, Nizamabad. In the District of Azamgarh during the year 1992-93. The accounts of the Nagar Panchayat were audited by the Examiner, Local Funds Accounts. U. P. and an audit report was prepared. According to the said report, the petitioner was responsible for misappropriation and misutilisalion of a sum of Rs. 78,278.52 p. The District Magistrate by his order dated 10.7.1996. Issued a notice to the petitioner to show cause as to why the said amount may not be recovered from him. The petitioner himself did not giv...
Bhoora (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2716
U.S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 12-8-1980 passed by the then learned IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut in Sessions Trial No. 352 of 1978 convicting the appellant under Section 307, I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of three years.2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that Nasruddin (P.W.3) had his hotel named Aziz Hotel near Hapur Bus Stand in Meerut City. His brother Alimuddin (P.W.2) was running a betel shop in front portion of the said hotel and was also helping Nasruddin (P.W.3) in the affairs of the hotel. Rafiq Ahmad (P.W.4) used to sell ice near said hotel. The appellant Bhoora often took meals at the said hotel.3. On the mid night of 30-7-1978/1-7-1978 appellant Bhoora along with his associate Mattu came to the said hotel and took meals. After taking meals, they started going. On it Nasruddin (P.W.3) and his servant demanded charges of the meals. The appellant Bhoora became annoyed and aske...
Daya Nand Yadav (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2230
U.S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 12-2-1981 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Azamgarh in S.T. No. 425 of 1979 convicting the appellant under Section 307 I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four years.2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that Khurmulli (P.W.I) as well as appellant Dayanand R/o Rasulpur, P.S. Doharighat district Azamgarh had their agricultural plots in the said village. The agricultural plots of the parties were irrigated through canal.3. On the after noon of 25-8-1979 at about 2.30 P.M. Khurmulli (P.W. 1) was irrigating his plot through canal water. The appellant closed the flow of water going towards the field of Khurmulli (P.W. 1) and diverted the same into his plot. Khurmulli (P.W. 1) came to the appellant and asked him as to why he had blocked flow of his water and saying it he again opened the flow of water towards his plot. On it the appellant whipped out a...
Kansa Alias Kansraj (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2216
U.S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 17-2-1981, passed by Sri D.C. Srivastava, the then Addl. Sessions Judge, Gyanpur, district Varanasi in S.T. No.9 of 1980, convicting the appellant under Section 396 IPC and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of payment of fine he was further sentenced to undergo one year's R.I.2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was as under :-Raj Narain (PW4) had his house at village Pandeypur, P.S. Suriyawa, district Varanasi. Ram Adhar deceased was uncle of Raj Narain (PW4). On the night of 16-10-1979, Raj Narain was sleeping in his verandah of Dalan. Ram Adhar, deceased was sleeping outside the house under a Neem tree. Ladies of his house were sleeping inside the house. At about 10-11 p.m. 10-11 dacoits armed with country made pistols, lathis and torches came to the house of Raj Narain, (PW4). The dacoits caused injuries to Raj Narain (PW4)....
Surya Nath and ors. Vs. Imam Ali and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2207
ORDERU.S. Tripathi, J.1. This revision has been directed against the judgment and order dated 12-4-1984 passed by 4th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Basti in Criminal Revision No.298 of 1981 allowing the revision filed by the opposite party No. 1. setting aside the judgment and order of acquittal dated 14-10-1981 passed by Judicial Magistrate and pending back the case to the learned Magistrate for retrial of the applicants after framing proper charge.2. The opposite party No.1 Imam Ali lodged a report on 7-3-1974 at 5.45 P.M. at P.S. Rudhauli, district Basti with the allegations that wife of applicant Asgar Ali was carrying illicit pregnancy and the above pregnancy was being attributed to him. In order to prove his innocence he had collected a Panchayat on 7-3-1974 at 2.00 P.M. at village Painda. Persons of the village had assembled. The applicant Yasin father of Asgar Ali was also informed about the said Panchayat. After some time Yasin came to the place of panchayat and told...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›