Allahabad Court October 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Km. Pallai Gupta Vs. Board of High School and Intermediate Education
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)AWC1369
ORDERS.P. Mehrotra, J.1. A perusal of the copy of the mark-sheet of the petitioner for the High School Examination, 2002 annexed as Annexure-1 to the petition shows that the petitioner was awarded 14/100 in the subject Sanskrit.2. By the order dated 6th September, 2002, the answer book of the petitioner in respect of the subject Sanskrit of High School Examination, 2002, was summoned. Today, learned standing counsel has produced before the Court the answer book of the petitioner in respect of the subject Sanskrit. A perusal of the answer book shows that the petitioner was awarded 64/100 in the subject Sanskrit, and not 14/100 as was mentioned in the mark-sheet issued to the petitioner, a copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-1 to the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been communicated the result of the scrutiny also and the marks awarded to the petitioner in respect of the subject Sanskrit have been shown as 64/100 as a result of scrutiny.3. In v...
Rajeev Kumar Vs. Adhyaksha, Zila Panchayat and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)AWC1810
S.K. Singh, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K. Sachan and Sri P.C. Srivastava, learned counsel, who appears for the respondents.2. Challenge before this Court is the order dated 26.8.1997 passed by the respondent No. 1 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition). It appears that the petitioner is claiming his appointment as a Clerk in clear vacancy in the office of Zila Panchayat, Kanpur Dehat, petitioner having been discontinued from service approached this Court by filing writ petition, i.e., Writ Petition No. 131108 of 1997 which was disposed of by the Judgment dated 21.4.1997. This Court directed for deciding of the representation in accordance with law. It is in pursuance of this direction respondent No. 1 moved, and took impugned decision which made the petitioner aggrieved to come up to this Court.3. On perusal of the order impugned before this Court, it is clear that the vacancy on which petitioner claims his appointment was never published and no interview to fil...
Narendra Alias Nagendra and ors. (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ2068
D.R. Chaudhary, J.1. The appellants assail validity of the judgment and order dated 19-12-1980 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad in Sessions Trial No. 398 of 1979 convicting Appellant No. 1 under Section 302, I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment, his brother Appellant No. 2 under Sections 302/34, I.P.C. sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and their Father Appellant No. 3 under Sections 302/34 and 364, I.P.C. sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and four years R.I. under Sections 302/34, I.P.C. under Sections 364. The sentences however directed to run concurrently.2. The prosecution came with this case:--Ram Sharan was Grandfather of Jai Bhagwan, whose two brothers were Hari Ram and Godha; Ramsharan had only one son Lakhmi Chand who had four sons, namely, Jagdish Sharma (P.W. 2), Satish (P.W. 3) Rishipal and Jai Bhagwan; Hariram had one son, namely, Jaichand (Appellant No. 3) who has six sons out of whom are Appellant Nos. 1 and 2 Narend...
Ramesh Chand (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ1315
Y.R. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 23-5-1997 passed by Sri Lekha Singh, the then Addl. Sessions Judge, Mahoba whereby he having convicted the appellant under Sections 498A, I.P.C. and 302, I.P.C. has sentenced him to undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment under Section 498A, I.P.C. and Life imprisonment under Section 302, I.P.C.2. The prosecution case, succinctly put, is that Smt. Kamlesh alias Munni, the victim, is the wife of the appellant. She had four issues, two male and two female, at the time of her death. The appellant was an addict of wine and gambling. The uncle of the father of the appellant-Ayodhya Prasad was issueless and he had given his properties to Smt. Kamlesh. The appellant used to pressurise his wife Smt. Kamlesh to sell the landed property in her name and bring cash from her father and brother to meet out his requirement and he also often used to torture and beat her. It was Holi on 16-3-1995. It is said that the appe...
Raj Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ1073; [2001(89)FLR178]
M.C. Jain, J. 1. This Appel has been preferred by the accused-appellant Raj Kumar against the judgment and order dated 15-5-1998 passed by Sri R.S. Gupta, the then Special Judge (DDA), Orai in Sessions Trial No. 154 of 1990. He has been convicted under Sections 302 and 404, I.P.C. Under Section 302, I.P.C. he has been sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo further simple imprisonment for two years. Under Section 404, I.P.C. he has been sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/-. In default of payment of fine, He has to undergo further simple imprisonment for six month. Substantive sentences of imprisonment have been ordered to run concurrently.2. The accused-appellant Raj Kumar allegedly committed the murder of his own mother Smt. Ram Kunwar in between the night of 4/5-8-89 at their house in Village Dharguwan, P.S. Kotwali, District Orai. The report was lodged on 5-8-1989 at 10.20 a.m. ...
Kapil Gupta Vs. Madhyamic Shiksha Parishad and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: (2003)1UPLBEC331
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for the following reliefs :'(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to produce the answer book of English 1st paper and Accountancy IInd paper concerning the petitioner.OrThis Hon'ble Court may pleased'to direct the respondents to scrutinise the answer book of the petitioner in presence of the guardian of the petitioner/deponent.(b) Issued any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the present facts and circumstances of the case.(c) Allow the writ petition with cost in favour of the petitioner.'2. It is, inter alia, alleged by the petitioner in the writ petition that the petitioner appeared in the Intermediate Examination, 2002 of the U.P. Board of High School and Intermediate Examination as regular student from Vishnu Inter College, Bareilly with subjec...
Cit Vs. Krishak Sahkari Ganna Samiti Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: [2002]125TAXMAN767(All)
Opinion of this court is sought for by the Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad through this reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in regard to the following question formulated by it :'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper interpretation of the objects of the society and the provisions of section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest earned by the assessee cooperative society from its members was covered by the provisions of section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and, therefore, exempt from tax ?'2. This reference relates to the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77 pertaining to Krishak Sahkari Ganna Samiti Ltd., Lakhimpur Kheri.3. The statement of the case is as follows :The assessee society was formed with the main object of organizing increase in sugarcane cultivation and purchase and sale of sugarcane crops at profitable price, expeditious supply of sugarc...
State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Om Prakash Verma
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)AWC100
S.K. Sen, C.J. 1. All the six special appeals are taken up and decided together as they arise out of common Judgment. D. B. Sant Singh Khalsa Inter College Partabpura, Agra is minority institution. Certain new sections were opened in this institution in certain classes with the approval of the District Inspector of Schools. Thereafter, appointment of different writ petitioners in all these writ petitions, which had been decided by the learned single Judge, were made as teachers in L. T. Grade according to law. Proposals were sent to the Director of Education (Secondary) U. P. for creation of these posts. Nothing has been done at the level of the Director till date. These facts are not disputed.2. The grievances of the writ petitioners who are respondents in these special appeals, are that they had not been paid salary for the respective posts. The plea for nonpayment as taken in the counter-affidavit, is that the posts, against which they had been appointed, were not sanctioned by the ...
Nagar Palika Vs. Nagar Palika Mali and Safai Kamgar Union and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)AWC225
Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of this writ petition. Nagar Palika, Ghaziabad through its Executive Officer has challenged the award of the Labour Court-II, Ghaziabad in Adjudication Case No. 292 of 1989 wherein the following dispute was referred to the labour court : ^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk layXuifjf'k'V esa mfYyf[kr vius 34 Jfedksa dks fu;fer ?kksf'kr u fd;k tkukmfpr rFkk@vFkok oS/kkfud gS] ;fn ugha] rks lacaf/krJfed D;k ykHk@vuqrks'k fjyhQ ikusdk vf/kdkjh gS] rFkk vU; fdl fooj.k lfgr ** 2. The aforesaid reference was answered by the labour court in favour of the workmen by holding that the workmen are entitled for regularisation. It is stated at the bar that during the pendency of the writ petition, all the workmen who are respondents in this writ petition, have been regularised as the posts have been sanctioned. It is made clear that the labour court awarded regularisatlon to the workmen from the date of their respective appointment, The case set-up by Nagar Palika before the labour c...
Gendan Lal Pal Vs. Labour Court and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)AWC224; [2002(95)FLR859]
AnjanI Kumar, J. 1. The petitioner by means of this writ petition has challenged the award passed by the Labour Court-Ill, Kanpur, dated 30.4.1996 in Adjudication Case No. 210 of 1992.2. The State Government referred the following dispute to the labour court to be adjudicated upon :^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk vius Jfedxsanu yky iky iq= Jh eqa'kh yky iky] tujy] jaxkbZ o /kqykbZ foHkkx in f'kVbapktZ dks mlds dk;Z dh izfr ds vuqlkj f'kV bapktZ dk inuke o rn~uwlkjosrueku 1]640&2]900 u fn;k tkuk vuqfpr rFkk@vFkok voS/kkfud gS ;fn gk] rks lacaf/kr Jfed D;k fgrykHk@vuqrks'k fjyhQ ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS] fdl frfFk ls rFkk fdl vU; fooj.k lfgr ** 3. The parties have exchanged their pleadings, The employers have disputed the fact that the concerned workman is not a workman within the meaning of Section 2 (z) of U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 and adduced the evidence to this effect. The workman was also allowed to adduce the evidence. Labour court after considering the material available on record h...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »