Allahabad Court August 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajni Chaudhary Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)AWC2548; (2001)3UPLBEC2300
Ashok Bhushan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner her salary by month to month including all arrears from 16th August. 1991. Facts of the case as emerge from the pleadings of the parties are that Bhartiya Municipal Girls inter College, Chandausi, district Moradabad, is a recognised institution receiving grant-in-aid from the State Government. On retirement of Smt. Gyanwati Devi Gupta on 30.6.1990, a substantive vacancy on the post of Lecturer Sanskrit came into existence. The committee of management intimated : the vacancy on 29.6.1990 to the U.P. Secondary Education Service Commission through Regional Inspectress of Girls Schools for filling up the post on ad hoc basis. The Regional Inspectress of Girls School gave permission to the committee of management to fill up the post on ad hoc basis. The Management advertised the vacancy in one news paper, namely, Rangeela Times' on 22.6.1991....
Prem NaraIn Singh, Advocate Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)AWC2558
M. Katju and R. B. Misra, JJ. 1. This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4, the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and its Joint Development Commissioner, to release from their possession plots No. 651 and 655 in district Agra and specifically to release the alleged places of worship and samadhis belonging to the ancestors of the petitioner. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the affidavits.3. By a notification under Section 28 of the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Act, 1965 vide Anncxure-2 to the petition, the respondent No. 3 proposed to acquire about 700 acres of land under its scheme called 'Sikandara Grih Sthan Evam Sadak Yojna. Agra'. The land of the petitioner measuring 24.5 bighas and consisting of about 19 plots also formed part of the area covered by the said notification. Details of the plots are given in paragraph 3 of the petition. On 17.3.1980 the respondent No. 3 issued a notification under Section 32 (1) ...
Suresh Kumar Tiwari Vs. D.i.G., P.A.C., Kanpur and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)AWC2630; [2002(92)FLR584]; (2001)3UPLBEC2522
Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. Heard Smt. Poonam Srivastava counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for the respondent. Counter rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent of the parties writ petition is being finally decided. 2. The facts of the case as emerge from the pleading of the parties are : 'The petitioner was appointed on 7.8.1989 as constable in P.A.C. In 1997, petitioner was posted at Jhansi. On 6.4.1997, the P.A.C. battalion was returning from Fatehgarh to Jhansi. Petitioner along with several other constables were travelling by train under the supervision of head constable Mewa Lal. Petitioner without informing Mewa Lal got down from the train at Orai railway station. On 6th April, 1997, petitioner opened fire on the residents of the mohalla Umrar Khera. The police from Kotwali Orai came and apprehended the petitioner along with other constable Santosh Kumar and took them in custody. A Case Crime No. 342 of 1997 was registered under Section 307. I.P.C. aga...
Mahesh Kumar Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4417
U.S. Tripathi, J.1. Appellant Mahesh Kumar has preferred this appeal against the Judgment and order dated 8-2-1991 passed by 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat in S.T. No. 198 of 1988 convicting the appellant under Sections 498A, 304B and 201, I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of 3 years under Section 498A, imprisonment, for life under Section 304B and R.I. for a period of 7 years under Section 201, I.P.C. Further it. was directed that all the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that Brij Bihari Awasthi (P.W. 2) had married his daughter Smt. Sunita deceased (17) about 11 months before the occurrence of this case with the appellant Mahesh. Kumar. He had provided adequate dowry in the marriage. But when Sunita deceased started living with the appellant after marriage the appellant along with his sister Km. Shashi and brother-in-law Prem Shankar started demand of scooter in dowry from Brij Bihari (P.W. 2)...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›