Allahabad Court May 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Prasad Alias Bhangad and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4412
M.A. Khan, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 17-4-1998 passed by Sri I.B. Singh, learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar thereby convicting the appellants of the offence punishable Under Section 148, IPC and sentencing them to under go R.I. for a period of two years each and further convicting the appellants of the offence punishable Under Section 302, IPC and sentencing them to under go imprisonment for life and further convicting all the appellants of the offence punishable Under Section 201, IPC and sentencing them to under go R.I. for a period of one year each. All the sentences were made to run concurrently.2. Brief facts leading to the prosecution of the appellants are that on 16-9-1996 at about 11.30 a.m. the complainant Ram Lai (PW 1) son of Gulab resident of village Natthapurwa within the circle of police station Gwaltoli, Kanpur Nagar along with his sons Ram Ashrey, Sukh Ram and Sukhdeo were going to Kanpur Court in connection with a criminal case...
Kallan Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4403
G.P. Mathur, J.1. Kalian has preferred this appeal from jail against his conviction Under Section 396, IPC and sentence for imprisonment for life imposed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Basti, by his judgment and order dated 24-3-1979 in ST No. 194 of 1976.2. The case of the prosecution as set forth in the FIR, in brief, is that the first informant PW 2, Rajendra Prasad Misra, was sleeping in the outer vernandah of his house in village Plkora. P.S. Dhabarua, in the night of 7-8-1976. His lather Ram Lakhari, Surya Nath Pandey and Idris were also sleeping there and a lantern was burning nearby. At about mid-night, 6-7 dacoits armed with various weapons came there and started assaulting them. Three or four dacoits entered the house after scaling the wall and opened the door from inside. Thereafter, they started removing various articles like ornaments, clothes, watch, cash money etc. from there. The first informant and other family members started raising an alarm on which Bharosey and...
Quality Exports and Chemicals Through Its Partner Shri Rajiv Kumar Vs. ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2001(75)ECC505
ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1. The petitioners are partnership concern engaged in manufacturing of menthol and DMO and are registered with the Central Excise Department for the same. On 12.7.95 the Central Excise Officer inspected the premises of the petitioners and found that the petitioners were clandestinely clearing the excisable goods manufactured by them and there was excess stock of finished goods which was not accounted for in their books. The department issued notices proposing a demand of Rs. 53,55,862.15 paise as Central Excise duty on clearing of goods valued at Rs. 2,71,54,179.00 without paying excise duty, proposing to demand Central Excise duty of Rs. 33.22.722.00 on the basis of assumption of abstract of menthol produced and cleared by the petitioners during June and July 1995 and further calling upon them to show cause why proposed penalty be not levied. The Adjudicating authority passed various orders whereby the goods worth Rs. 99,39,334.00 seized from the petitioners on 12.7....
Dilip Kumar Goswami and Others Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal, Al ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: [2001(90)FLR277]; 2001LabIC3962; (2001)2UPLBEC1742
M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned letter dated 15.10.1999 and the order dated 13.3.2001, Annexures-1, 1A and 10 to the writ petition and for a mandamus directing the respondent to declare the result of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Station Master.2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.10.1999 by which the Railway Board has cancelled the recruitment conducted for the post of Assistant Station Master. True copy of the letter dated 15.10.1999 is Annexure-1 to the petition. That order states that the Railway Board has decided to cancel the aforesaid examination on the basis of the report of the Chairman. Railway Board, that there were serious irregularities and malpractices in the conduct of the examination.3. It is alleged in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners appeared in the written examination held on 23.6.1996 for the post of Assistant Station Master and were declared successful vide Annexure-2 to the writ p...
Rauf Vs. Iiird Additional District Judge, Deoria and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)AWC1852
O.P. Garg, J. 1. A.S.C.C. Suit No. 114 of 1973 for ejectment of the present petitioner from the tenanted accommodation and for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits was instituted by the respondent No. 2 -Ganesh Das. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court on 15th December, 1975. The respondent No. 2 - landlord preferred a revision application No. 11 of 1976 under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act. It was allowed by order dated 8.2.1977 by the then IIIrd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Deorta. Accordingly, suit for ejectment of the petitioner from thedisputed accommodation and for realization of Rs. 526.08 N.P. was decreed, besides mesne profits with Interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum. It is this revisional order which has been challenged by the petitioner-tenant in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The petition was dismissed on 3.1.2001 as even after the revision of the list, none appeared on behalf ...
Sher Bahadur Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: [2001(90)FLR354]; 2001LabIC3887; (2001)2UPLBEC1656
M. Katju and R. B. Misra, JJ.1. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 22.8.2000 Annexure-11 to the writ petition and for quashing the order of dismissal dated 13.12.1994 Annexure-8 to the writ petition.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as casual labour by order dated 19.5.1989 Annexure-1 to the writ petition. He was subsequentlygranted pay scale and temporary status on the post of Khalasi.4. The petitioner was issued a charge-sheet dated 11.5.1991 vide Annexure-3 to the writ petition. In this charge-sheet, the allegation was that the petitioner fraudulently secured an appointment letter signed by Sri Ajit Singh A.P.O./C., Kashmiri Gate, Delhi and reported for duty as re-engaged casual labour without having worked prior to 1981 and/or without specific and personal approval of the General Manager. The petitioner submitted his reply dated 25.3.1...
N.A. Traders Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: [2002]128STC653(All)
Sudhir Narain, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Standing Counsel.2. The learned Tribunal, by the impugned order dated March 14, 2001 has not accepted the claim of the applicant on the ground that the applicant failed to submit form III-A. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant had in fact received form III-A and it wanted to submit before the Tribunal but the applicant could not get an opportunity. The applicant has annexed form III-A in this revision.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after hearing learned counsel for the parties I am of the view that the applicant may submit form III-A before the Tribunal. In case the form III-A is submitted the department shall get an opportunity to submit its objection and submit any evidence in rebuttal.4. In view of the above the revision is allowed. The impugned order dated March 14, 2001 is hereby set aside. The Trade Tax Tribunal, Kanpur, shall decide the appeal afresh...
Bhunda and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3898
U.S. Tripathi, J.1.This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 23-3-1981 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Jhansi in S.T. No. 68 of 1976 convicting the appellants Bhunda, Kaluta, Mantola, Hari Ram, Matadin and Ghansoo under Sections 307 read with Section 149, I.P.C., Section 324 read with Section 149, I.P.C., Section 325 read with Section 149, I.P.C., Section 323 read with Section 149, I.P.C., Sections 148, 147 and 143, I.P.C. and sentencing them to R.I. for a period of 7 years under Section 307/149, I.P.C., R.I, for a period of 3 years under Section 325/149, I.P.C., R.1. for a period of 1 year under Section 324/149, I.P.C. and R.I. for a period of 6 months under Section 323/149 apd R.I. for a period of one year under Section 148, I.P.C., R.I. for a period of 6 months under Section 147, I.P.C. and R.I for a period of 3 months under Section 143, I.P.C. Accused Bhunda and Kaluta were further convicted and sentenced under Section 324, I.P.C. simplicitor...
Shashi Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3900
ORDERU.S. Tripathi, J.1.This petition under Section 482, Cr. P.C. has been filed for quashing the proceedings of complaint case No. 2331 of 1992 and the order dated 18-1-1993 and 18-3-1993 passed by Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Mirzapur.2. The applicant had executed a registered agreement to sell in favour of opposite party No, 2 regarding certain plots situated in village Matawaria Tappa Upraudh, Pargana Kantith, Tehsil Lalganj, District Mirzapur. The applicant and his brothers were, owners and bhumidhars of said plots. Theresas a family settlement amongst the brothers of the applicant in which the applicant got 1/4 share in the plots in question and had a right to make transaction including the sale in respect of the plots in question. The applicant was ready to perform the part of his agreement by executing sale deed. Opposite party No. 2 himself resiled from contract and did not pay balance amount of Rs. 55000/- due to which the sale deed could not be executed and he wrongly filed a co...
Amerika Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-16-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4401
U.S. Tripathi, J.1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 1-5-2000, passed by Sri Brahm Singh, learned Sessions Judge, Kushinagar at Padrauna in Session Trial No. 96 of 1998, convicting the appellant under Section 376, IPC and sentencing him to three years rigorous imprisonment over and above incarcertaion of two years or so already undergone by him.2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that on 16-9-98 at about 10.00 a.m. Km. Sushila, PW2, aged about ten years, sister of the complainant Bahoran Pal, P.W. 1 was watching her maize crop. Appellant Amerika called her for lifting bundle of maize crop. She went there and observing the bundle of crop showed her inability to lift it. Thereafter the appellant took her inside a sugarcane field, where he committed rape on her. She raised alarm and on her alarm her brother Bahoran Pal, PW1 and uncle Vishwa Nath came there. Observing them the appellant ran away leaving the prosecutrix on the spot. Her ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »