Skip to content

Allahabad Court May 2001 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 01 2001

Jai Kumar Singh Vs. the District Inspector of Schools and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-01-2001

Reported in: (2001)2UPLBEC1571

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.K. Rai appearing for the respondent No. 4 and Sri A. N. Rai appearing for respondent No. 3. The respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 have already submitted counter affidavit to which rejoinder affidavit has been filed by the petitioner. With the consent of the parties, I proceed to dispose of the writ petition finally.2. There is an educational institution, namely, Mahabir Singh Intermediate College, Badilpur Haldi, Ballia which is a recognised institution receiving grant in aid. In the aforesaid institution sanctioned strength of Class III employee is three. One post of Librarian Clerk/Assistant Clerk fell vacant on 31.12.1994 on the retirement of Basudeo Singh. The respondent No. 3, Triloki Nath, who is a Class IV employee in the institution laid his claim for promotion on the aforesaid post of Clerk under Chapter III, Regulation II of the Intermediate Education Act on the ground that the said post is the promotional post. The...


May 01 2001

R.K. Pal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-01-2001

Reported in: (2001)2UPLBEC1793

S.R. Singh, J.1. Common questions of law and facts are involved in these petitions and, therefore, it would be convenient to dispose of the petitions by a composite judgment. Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel representing the State authorities.2. A condensed account of necessary facts is that the process or recruitment to the post of Cane Supervisor in Deoria Region was stayed by the respondents upon the supposition that the rule of reservation as envisaged in the U.P. Public Services. (On posts Reservation for Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Class) Act, 1994 was not properly applied. It appears that a writ petition being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3622 of 99 was filed laced with the allegation that the rule of reservation was not properly applied to the vacancies. Although the final result of selection was published, issuance of appointment letter was forestalled because of the interim order dated 24.8.99 passed in Writ Petition No. 3622...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial