Allahabad Court February 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ayodhya Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-07-2001
Reported in: AIR2001All153; (2001)1UPLBEC905
ORDER1. The petitioner, who claims to be a freedom fighter, has come up with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the natue of certiorari quashing the order dated 3-2-1999 as contained in Annexure-1 and to direct the Respondents to pass an order reviving his political pension granted to him by order dated 31-5-1975 and to pay up-to-date arrears from 1977 and continue to pay the same during his life time.2. Te undisputed factual matrix of the case, as born out from the records are as follows :- From Annexure-4 to the writ petition and Annexure-1 to the Supplementary affidavit it is apparent that vide letter dated 31-5-1975 Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India informed the Accountant General U. P. II, Allahabad that the Government of India had sanctioned a sum of Rs. 200/- per month as political pension to the petitioner which the petitioner continued to receive till it was cancelled vide Government Order No. 164 ZK 16-82-208 K. P./78 dated 6-11-1982 as communicated t...
Raju V. John (Smt.) Vs. the Regional Joint Director of Education, Agra ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-07-2001
Reported in: (2001)2UPLBEC1083
A.K. Yog, J.1. The Committee of Management/respondent No. 3 is served by Dasti notice as well as R.P.A.D. through registry vide office report dated 7.2.2001. Notice will be deemed to have been served by registered post under Chapter VIII, Rule 2, Explanation II, Rules of the Court.2. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 filed counter-affidavit and rejoinder affidavit in reply thereto has also come on record.3. This petition is being finally decided at this stage as all the respondents have been adequately given suitable opportunity to contest the case.4. The Baptist Higher Secondary School, Agra (called 'school') is a recognised institution under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (called as 'Act No. 22 of 1921').5. It was recognised as Higher Secondary School (minority school) vide order dated 25.2.84 by the U.P. Board. The school came on grant-in-aid list of the State Government. The institution came under the purview of the U.P. High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salari...
Ved Prakash Agrawal Vs. the Chairman, U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-07-2001
Reported in: (2001)2UPLBEC1476
Yatindra Singh, J.1. Sri Ved Prakash Agrawal (Sri Agrawal) Joined U.P. State Sugar Corporation Limited, Lucknow (the Corporation) sometime, in the year, 1973. His services wre terminated on 24.8.1976, w.e.f. 25.3.1976; he raised a labour dispute. In concilliation proceedings, the parties came to the terms and the order temination his services was cancelled on 17.11.1976. According to Sri Agrawal he went back to the Corporation on 24.11.1976, but was not taken back and he raised a labour dispute again. This dispute was referred to Labour Court. The Labour Court by its award dated 14.5.1980 accepted the contention of the corporation that Sri Agarwal himself did not join his duties on his own accord. In view of this finding no relief was granted to him. It appears that subsequently Sri Agrawal did join duties sometimes in 1978 and the corporation permitted him to work.2. Sri Agrawal continued in service of the Corporation and was charge sheeted on 9.2.1987, for misconduct (disobedience, i...
Moti Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-07-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ2086
G.P. Mathur, J.1. The officers of Sals Tax Department conducted checking of a truck bearing No. DL-1-G-7901 at the Mohan Nagar barrier in district Ghaziabad in the night of 18th/19th Dec. 1999 and a bundle of cotton cloth was found there in which according to the documents was being transported from Delhi to Siliguri. On opening the bundle it was found that it contained 50 skins of leopard, 3 skins of tiger and 5 skins of jungle fox. Information about the articles was sent to officers of Forest Department, Ghaziabad who arrived on the spot and seized the skin of animals under Section 50 of The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Pratap Chandra and Pappu Singh, driver and conductor respectively, of the truck were taken into custody. Thereafter Sewa Singh, Forester, lodged a F.I.R. at 23.15 hours on 19-12-1999 and on the basis of the same a case was registered as crime No. 915 of 1999 under Sections 9, 39(3), 44, 49, 50, 51, 57 and 58 of the Act at P.S....
Smt. Sumitra Devi and Others Vs. District Judge Chitrakoot and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC866
U. S. Tripathi, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 17.11.2000 passed by respondent No. 1 in Civil (S.C.C.) Revision No. 15 of 1998 allowing the revision and setting aside the order dated 6.11.1998 passed by Judge, Small Causes Court and allowing the substitution application moved on behalf of the respondents.2. The plaintiff respondent No. 1 filed suit for ejectment and arrears of rent against the defendant petitioners on the ground of default in payment of rent. Defendants contested the suit on the ground that provisions of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 were applicable to the premises in question and he was entitled to the protection of the said Act. Therefore, by simple notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, his tenancy could not be terminated. The trial court decreed the suit holding that provisions of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 were not applicable to the premises in question and tenancy was terminated on service of notice under Section 106 o...
Bar Association, Ghaziabad Vs. Registrar General, High Court of Judica ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC877; (2001)2UPLBEC1116
Binod Kumar Roy and D. R. Chaudhary, JJ.1. The Bar Association, Ghaziabad, has come up with a prayer to quash the following communication made by the Registrar General of the Court to the District Judge, Ghaziabad/Bulandshahr vide letter No. 9875/Admin. (9-3) Allahabad dated 22.7.2000 as contained in Annexure-1, which reads thus :'Sub : Transfer of pending cases pertaining to territorial jurisdiction of Gautam Budh Nagar from the District Court, Ghaziabad and Bulandshahr to Gautam Budh Nagar. 'I am directed to say that the matter regarding transfer of pending cases pertaining to territorial jurisdiction of Gautam Budh Nagar from District Court, Ghaziabad and Bulandshahr to Gautam Budh Nagar District wasconsidered by the Court and after consideration, the Court has been pleased to observe that except part heard cases pertaining to the district Gautam Budh Nagar, the other pending cases relating to the district in the Court at Ghaziabad and Bulandshahr be transferred to District and Sess...
Ram Adhar Lal Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: (2001)1UPLBEC916
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. The petitioner had worked as Assistant Teacher in Kulbhaskar Ashram Agricultural College, Allahabad from 1.9.1952 to 1.3.1964. From 2.3.1964. the petitioner had joined as lecturer in Biology in Government Inter College, Basti. where be worked upto 24.8.1968 and from 25.8.1968 he worked in Government Inter College. Jubili, Gorakhpur and from 8.12.1984 to 12.11.1986 he worked as Head Master in Government Higher Secondary School, Baghwala, Nainital. From 13,11.1986 to 31.1.1988 he worked as officiating Principal in Government Inter College, Gorakhpur and thereafter, he worked in Government Inter College, Almorah from 1.2.1988 to 26.7.1989 and from 27.7.1989 to 30.6.1990 he functioned as Principal in Government Inter College, Deoria.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the service rendered by him for the period 1.9.1952 to 1.3.1964 is not being taken into account while computing the pensionary benefit. The petitioner made representation to the District Inspector of...
Hindustan Ferro and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Debt Recovery Tribuna ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: [2003]113CompCas58(All); (2001)2UPLBEC1088
ORDERO.P. Garg, J.1. The woodcut profile of the case of the petitioner No. 1, a company duly registered under the Companies Act, carrying on the business of manufacturing Ferro Silicon and of which the petitioner No. 2 is the director is that an agreement was executed in 1990 between petitioner company and respondent No. 2 State Bank of India, Industrial Finance Branch, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur for grant of credit facility. It was renewed on 3-11-1997. The credit facility was granted to petitioners on hypothecation of stock, stores, spares and finished goods etc. That apart, U.P. Financial Corporation Limited and Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation of U.P. have also granted term loans to the petitioner and they have the first priority/charge to claim fixed assets of the company, such as, land, building, plant, machineries etc. On the amount of loan, the respondent No. 2 Bank had charged interest of about Rs. 20 Lacs, with the result that the petitioners company could not pa...
District Judge and anr. Vs. Bhudev Sharma
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: (2001)1UPLBEC574
Binod Kumar Roy and D.R. Chaudhary, JJ.1. Re : Civil Misc. (Delay Contortion) Application No. 2881 of 2000 alongwith Affidavit dated 17.5.2000 the Courier-affidavit dated 14.9.2000 of the Respondent and Rejoinder Affidavit elated 2.11.2000.Through this Special Appeal filed on 25.5.2G00 the Appellants-the District judge. Bulaudshahr and Chairman of the Selection Committee, assail validity of the Judgment and order dated 25th September, 1997 passed by a learned. Single Judge of this Court allowing Respondent's Civil Misc. writ petition No. 5649 of 1997 filed for quashing the order dated 21.1.1994 passed by Appellant No, 1 rejecting his representation dated 15.1.1994 with a further prayer to command the appellants to consider his appointment against Class III post in reserved category pursuant to the 1992 examination. By the impugned Judgment and Order the learned Single Judge had disposed of the writ petition directing the Appellant No. 1 to offer an appointment to the Respondent against...
N. Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: [2001(89)FLR314]; (2001)1UPLBEC577
Sudhir Narain, J.1. The petitioner has sought writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.4.2000 whereby he was informed by respondent No. 1 that the competent authority has decided not to grant any further extension to the petitioner in the post of Managing Director of Bharat Pumps and Compressor, Nairn., Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as BPCL).2. The petitioner was appointed as Managing Director of BPCL, respondent No. 3, vide letter dated 15.10.1993 with effect from 19.10.1993 for a period of five years. The appointment could, however, be terminated by either side by giving three months' notice or pay in lieu thereof. Paragraph 3 of the letter mentioned that the detailed terms and conditions of the appointment will be followed- The petitioner was informed of the terms and conditions of the appointment by letter dated 4th January, 1994. Clause (i) of the terms of appointment provided for the period of appointment as under:''Period.-The period of his appointment will be five ye...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »