Allahabad Court May 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Kumar (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. and Others Vs. Additional D ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC2341
Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the respondent No. 1 dated 8.5.1985 whereby the disputed shop was held to be vacant.2. The factual matrix of the case is that one Radhey Shyam was ownerof the shop of which Ram Mohan was a tenant. Ram Mohan died on 13.9.1965 leaving behind him five sons, four daughters and his widow as his heirs and legal representatives. Dhruv Narayan. petitioner No. 2 is one of his sons and Smt. Sharda Devi is one of his daughters. Vijay Kuinar, petitioner No. 1 is husband of Smt. Sharda Devi. Radhey Shyam, the landlord filed Suit No. 454 of 1966 against the heirs of Ram Mohan for recovery of arrears of rent, ejectment and damages with the allegations that after the death of Ram Mohan. his heirs became tenants of the disputed shop. They have sublet it to Vijay Kumar. husband of Smt. Sharda Devi. the daughter of the tenant. The defendants contested the suit. The trial court framed an issue as to whether defendants had sublet the p...
State of U.P. Vs. Gaya Prasad and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ1751
Bhanwar Singh, J.1.This is a. State Appeal filed against the verdict of acquittal dated 23-3-1978 passed by Sri S.N. Saxena, the then III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Barabanki, thereby acquitting the accused respondents of the charges Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 307 and 149 IPC.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be recapitulated as below :-Head Constable Sheo Kumar Lal posted at P.S. Tikat Nagar, District Barabanki, received an information on 16-3-1972 to the effect that a strong group of more than a dozen of villagers, some of them being armed with lethal weapons, had formed an unlawful assembly near the house of Sharda (deceased) and Govind Prasad, both brothers living in the same house, in village Tasipur. The purpose of the villagers having formed the said unlawful assembly was to eliminate both the above named brothers and it was with that motive in mind that their house had been surrounded by members of the unlawful assembly. Sheo Kumar Lal, on receipt of t...
Amrit Lal and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ4518
M.C. Jain, J.1. All these appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 9-2-1999 passed by Sri Satti Deen, the then Special Addl. Sessions Judge, Mirzapur in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 1996. In all, there are eight appellants, Amrit Lal, Kalloo alias Sukh Lal, Mittal Pasi and Hari Lal Mallah are the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 355 of 1999. Ganga Pasi is appellant of Criminal Appeal No. 356 of 1999, Criminal Appeal No. 701 of 2000 has been preferred by Nanda Mallah, Pancham Mallah and Ram Ashrey Pasi. All of them excepting Hari Lal Mallah have been convicted under Section 302, I.P.C. read with Section 149, I.P.C. Four of them, namely, Nandu Mallah, Pancham Mallah, Ram Ashrey Pasi and Ganga Pasi have been sentenced to death. The remaining three, namely, Kalloo alias Sukh Lal, Amrit Lal and Mittal Pasi have been sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302, I.P.C. read with Section 149, I.P.C. Nandu Mallah, Kalloo alias Sukh Lal, Pancham Mallah, Ganga Pasi, Ram Ashrey ...
TSL Voluntary Retired Employee's Welfare Association and another Vs. T ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-09-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC1923; [2000(85)FLR942]; (2000)2UPLBEC1503
M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed praying for writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give the benefit of pay revision in accordance with the circular letter dated 30.5.1997 and the relevant agreement with the workers of Triveni Structurals Limited, Naini (which is a public sector undertaking) from 1.2.1992.2. The petitioner claims to be a registered society for the welfare of voluntarily retired employees of Triveni Structurals Ltd., Naini, Allahabad. In para 2 of the petition, it is stated that a large number of employees have taken voluntary retirement from the company, which is alleged to be an instrumentality of the State. In para 11 of the petition, it is stated that with the object to streamline the public sectors, the Government of India took a decision to introduce a Voluntary Retirement Scheme in Triveni Structurals Ltd., Naini and other public sector undertakings throughout the country known as Voluntary Retirement Scheme. 1990. By the circular dated 7....
Dr. Sushil Prakash Gupta Vs. Executive Council, University of Allahaba ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-09-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC1989; (2000)3UPLBEC2466
M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for a writ of certtorari to quash the Impugned resolution dated 9.3.2000 passed by the Executive Council of Allahabad University vide Annexure-12 to the petition, and the orders dated 10.3.2000 and 11.3.2000 passed by the Registrar vide Annexures-13 and 14 to the writ petition.2. We have heard Sri R. N. Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. R. G. Padia learned counsel for the respondents.3. The petitioner is the Director of the Institute of Correspondence Courses and Continuing Education (hereinafter referred to as the Institute). The University of Allahabad established it after obtaining prior sanction from the University Grants Commission. The University framed Ordinances relating to the Institute which are contained in Chapter XXXV of the University Calendar vide Annexure-1 to the writ petition.4. It is alleged in paragraph 7 of the writ petition that the Institute was established in the year 1976 andis continuing since the...
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. Rama Ram Sonkar and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-09-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC2167
D.K. Seth, J.1. Original Suit No. 548, of 1987, was filed by one Rama Ram Sonkar against one Mahendra Kumar and another, claiming a relief in respect of the accounting of the business from 1984 till the date of the suit and to pay profit payable to the plaintiff and that the defendant No. 2, shall not be permitted to stay with his family inside the godown.2. In the suit, an application for appointment of receiver was filed by the plaintiff. By an order dated 28.5.1990, one Sri Sachidanand Singh was appointed as receiver. By an order dated 1.9.1990, the appointment of the said Sri Sachidanand Singh was recalled. Shri B.K. Varma. Assistant Manager, LPG, Indian Oil Corporation. Ghazipur, was appointed as receiver for ensuring distribution of Gas Cylinder in connection with the business of the plaintiff. On 7.9.1990, an application was filed by the said Shri B.K. Varma, Assistant Manager. LPG, Indian Oil Corporation, Ghazipur, praying that he should not be appointed as receiver. Despite su...
Saud Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-09-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ309
R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. This writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 25th June, 1999, passed by respondent No. 2 District Magistrate, Aligarh under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980, hereinafter referred to as 'Act', under which petitioner has been detained.2. Along with impugned order of detention, petitioner was served the grounds on which basis detaining authority formed his subjective satisfaction for detaining petitioner under the Act. The allegations contained in the grounds against petitioner are that on 18-5-1999 at 1.25 P.M. he participated in dacoity in which 4 lakhs rupees of Palasallu branch of State Bank of India were looted, while it was being loaded on Jeep No. W.R.A. 2217, for being deposited in the main branch of the State Bank of India. In this incident, security guard of the bank and one Netra Pal Singh, another employee of the bank were injured and S.B.B.L. gun of the guard was also looted. It is stated that petitioner along with his 6, 7 com...
Abid Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-09-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3910
R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. In both the aforesaid writ petitions, questions of fact and law involved are similar and they can be decided by a common judgment against which learned counsel for the parties have no objection Writ Petition No. 54932 of 1999 shall be the leading case.2. In both the petitions, petitioners have challenged the orders dated 22nd June, 1999, passed by District Magistrate, Moradabad under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980, hereinafter referred to as 'Act,' under which they have been detained. Petitioners were served the grounds of detention on which basis detaining authority formed his subjective satisfaction for detaining petitioners under the Act.3. The allegations against petitioners contained in the grounds are that on 1-12-1998, the prominent exporter Sri Inamul Haq s/o late Sri Abdul Latif, r/o 231, Lajpat Nagar, Moradabad was kidnapped by petitioner and his companions in Maruti Car No. D.D.U. 3152 while he was travelling on a Rickshaw and was on way...
Smt. Anisa and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-09-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ4524
ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. The opposite party No. 2 moved an application under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja to direct the police of police station Poham to register the case for offences under Sections 323, 498-A, I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act against the applicants. That application was rejected by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. Khurja by order dated 28-8-1999. The opposite party No. 2 preferred Criminal Revision No. 458 of 1999 against that order, which have been allowed by the Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr by order dated 17-12-1999. Against that order the present revision has been preferred by the accused nominated in the F.I.R.2. I have heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri R. P. Singh for the opposite party No. 2 and the learned A.G.A.3. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the order of the Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr is without jurisdiction. Section 156, Cr.P.C. is in Chapter XII...
Fuzail Ahmad Vs. Commissioner, Allahabad Mandal and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-08-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC1928
R. H. Zaidi, J.1. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.8.1999 whereby the licensing authority under the Arms Act cancelled the firearm licence of the petitioner. Challenging the validity of the said order, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad. The Commissioner dismissed the appeal holding that it was not maintainable.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by the Commissioner is wholly illegal. He should have applied his mind to the facts of the case and should have decided the appeal by means of reasoned order, after perusal of record. Learned standing counsel has only formally opposed this petition. He virtually conceded that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner was not a valid order.3. As desired by the learned counsel for the parties, t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »