Allahabad Court December 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Sumanlata Sharma Vs. Regional Joint Director of Education, Meerut ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-04-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC356
V. M. Sahai, J.,1. The short question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether a part-time teacher working in an aided institution and paid honorarium by the management to teach a subject recognised by the Board under Section 7-A of the U. P. Intermediate Education Act. 1921, can claim regularisation and payment of salary even though the post is not sanctioned or created by the Government?2. Sri Mahabir Shiksha Sadan Inter College, Jain Nagar, Meerut (in brief institution) is a recognised and aided institution. By order dated 13.8.1982, permission was granted to the institution, for teaching Science subject in High School, by the Additional Secretary, Board of High School and Intermediate Education, Meerut. And by the same order, the District Inspector of Schools, Meerut (in brief DIOS) was directed to permit the institution to start classes in Science. The DIOS granted permission on 9.10.1985. The management issued an advertisement in newspaper 'Dainik Prabhat' on 28....
Udai Veer Singh and Another Vs. District Inspector of Schools, Deoria ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-04-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC494
V. M. Sahai, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration is whether the mandatory provision of Regulation 101 of Chapter III of the Regulations framed under the U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (in brief Regulations) applies to a minority institution?2. Aiysha Rasheed Girls Higher Secondary School, Deoria is an aided and recognised institution (in brief institution). It has also been recognised as a minority institution. Two Class-IV employees working in the institution retired. Abdul Ghaniretired on 31.7.2000 and Smt. Sayra retired on 31.8.2000. Before the retirement of these Class-IV employees, the officiating principal on 15.7.2000 and 7.8.2000 informed the District Inspector of Schools. Deoria (in brief D.I.O.S.) that permission be granted to fill the posts after retirement of these employees. No order was passed by the D.I.O.S.. The principal advertised both the vacancies on 7.8.2000 in the newspaper 'Nirmal Swar'. The petitioners were selected on 2.9,2000. The pri...
Smt. Kusumanjali Agarwal Vs. Director of Education (Basic), Allahabad ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC22
A. K. Yog, J.1. Heard, Sri K. C. Vishwakarma, advocate, counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 5, Mr. C. D. Misra, advocate, counsel for respondent No. 6/Committee of Management. Perused the record. Writ Petition is finally disposed at this stage as the parties are served and also have exchanged their pleadings as contemplated under Chapter XXII, Rule 20 II Proviso, Rules of Court, 1952 (as amended up to date).2. Smt. Kusumanjali Agrawal, petitioner, approached this Court through this writ petition under Article 226, Constitution of India and prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents, (including Director of Education, (Basic) U. P. Allahabad, Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mirzapur, Account Officer, office of Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mirzapur and Committee of Management, Smt. Kshirad Kumari Balika Vidyalaya, Junior High School, City and district Mirzapur called the 'School' not to interfere in the functioning of the petitioner as Assistant ...
A.S. Advertising Co., Meerut and Another Vs. Nagar Nigam, Meerut and A ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC28; (2001)1UPLBEC125
M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition was filed for a mandamus directing respondent No. 1 the Nagar Nigam, Meerut not to settle the contract in respect of advertisement hoardings in favour of respondent No. 2 and to restrain the respondents from interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the hoarding sites.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. It has been alleged in paragraph 2 of the petition that the petitioners are engaged in the business of advertising by fixing hoardings on the roadsides within the municipal limits of the Nagar Nigam, Meerut. In paragraph 3 of the petition, it is alleged that the Nagar Mahapalika (now known as Nagar Nigam) has framed rules for settling such contracts. True copy of the rules is annexed as Annexure-1 to the petition. 4. The aforesaid rules do not prescribe the manner in which the hoardings are to be let out. The petitioners have erected their own hoarding on the roadsides within the Meerut City and they are regularly depositi...
Mariampur Hospital Society Vs. Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC14; (2001)1UPLBEC385
M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the respondents to refund the amount of Rs. 3,46,875 illegally realised from the petitioner on 13.2.1997 along with interest @ 18%. By an amendment application a prayer for certiorari has also been made to quash the assessment order Annexure-2 to the amendment application. There is a further prayer of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay damages to the petitioner for physical and mental torture suffered by the employees of the petitioners. 2. We have heard learned counsels for the parties. 3. The petitioner is a registered society and is running a charitable hospital in the name of Mariampur Hospital in the city of Kanpur. In para 7 of the petition, it is alleged that all medical advice and treatment to most of the patients coming to the hospital is given free of cost. No charge is taken from poor patients for beds in general wards and medicine is also given free of cost to such patients. By order dated 31....
Karan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC224; (2001)1UPLBEC128
M. Katju, J.1. Heard Smt. Poonam Srivastava learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Yogesh Agarwal 1 for respondent No. 3.2. The petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing the respondents to grant lease for Pheri Khurd, block No. 1 in favour of respondent No. 3 on the basis of his application moved in 1995.3. It appears that an application of respondent No. 3 for grant of mining lease for 3 years from 1995 to 1998 was accepted by the authorities vide Annexure-2 to the petition but the lease deed was not executed because of an interim order of the Lucknow Bench of this Court dated 9.2.1996 vide Annexure-CA2 in Writ Petition No. 437 (MB) of 1996. This writ petition was subsequently withdrawn on 9.10.1998 vide Annexure-CA4. The respondent No. 3 deposited a sum of Rs. 6,11,062.50 as first instalment of the lease amount vide Annexure-CA2. However, due to the interim order of the Lucknow Bench the lease deed could not be executed. ...
State Bank of India, Varanasi Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC659
M. Katju and Onkareshwar Bhatt,JJ.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned notice dated 9.3.1995 Annexure-6 to the writ petition as well as recovery certificate dated 29.1.1993 Annexure-1 to the writ petition.2. Heard, Sri S. N. Varma, senior advocate and Sri Yashwant Varma learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents.3. The facts of the case are that the U. P. Excise Department held a public auction for selling of rights to deal in liquor and other intoxicating substances in accordance with the U. P. Excise Act. Certain successful bidders purchased drafts favouring the Excise Department which were payable at the Main Branch of the petitioner at Allahabad. These drafts were submitted to the petitioner by the District Excise Officer along with the Government credit challans for their collection from the State Bank of India, Allahabad Branch. In paragraph 7 of the petition, it is alleged that the amount in favour of the excise ...
Gyan Chandra Vs. Nagar Swasthya Adhikari and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ2073
ORDERVirendra Saran, J.1. Gyan Chandra has preferred this revision against the judgment and order dated 10-4-1986 of Shri R.C. Pandey, II Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar dismissing criminal appeal No. 59M of 1984 against the judgment and order dated 23-2-1984 of Sri K.K. Tyagi, Metropolitan Magistrate (Corporation) Kanpur convicting and sentencing the applicant Under Section 7/ 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (for short the Act) to six months' R.I. and a fine of Rs. 1000.2. According to the case of the prosecution a sample of mustard oil was collected from the applicant by Sri K.P. Singh, Food Inspector on 22-4-1982. It. was sent for analysis to the public analyst who by his report dated 11-6-1982 found the sample adulterated. This adulteration consisted of the fact that the sample was found positive for the presence of argemone oil. In other respects there was nothing wrong with the mustard oil. According to the report of the public analyst saponification value w...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›