Allahabad Court December 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Saroj Singh Vs. Regional Deputy Director of Education (Secondary) ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC656; (2001)1UPLBEC465
ORDERV. M. Sahai, J.1. Kamla Balika Inter College, Basni, Varanasi, is a recognised and aided institution. On 14.12.1981 the Regional Inspectress of Girls School, Varanasi, passed an order, sanctioning three posts of Lecturers of Sanskrit, History and Sociology. The management sent requisition to the commission to fill the post of Lecturer Sociology on 25.2.1983 but the commission made no selection. The management notified the vacancy on 11.8.1990 on the notice board and invited applications for making ad hoc appointments on the post of Lecturer Sociology. The petitioner applied and she was selected. The management passed a resolution on 27.1.1991 for appointing her as Lecturer Sociology for short time on ad hoc basis and issued an appointment letter on 28.10.1991. She joined on 29.10.1991. The papers were forwarded to the Regional Inspectress of Girls School for granting financial approval to the appointment. It is claimed that no order was passed by the Regional Inspectress of Girls ...
Dhirendra Kumar Gautam Vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC689; [2001(88)FLR757]
D. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Mahesh Gautam, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri V. N. Agarwal, the learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondents.2. Dhirendra Kumar Gautam, an erstwhile Jail Warden, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for impugning the two orders and judgment dated 15th July, 1998 and 23rd July, 1998 passed by the U. P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow, copies whereof are Annexures-6 and 8 to the petition.3. By the order and judgment dated 15th July, 1998, the Tribunal has rejected the claim petition of the petitioner and the order and judgment dated 23rd July, 1998 purports to reject the petition of the petitioner seeking review of the order and judgment dated 15th July, 1998. The prayer for quashing the orders dated 20th February, 1987 and 1st July, 1991, giving rise to the claim petition, has also been made. The order dated 20th February, 1987, a copy whereof is Ann...
Union of India Through General Manager, Northern Railway and Others Vs ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC732; (2001)1UPLBEC420
Palok Basu, J.1. The issue in controversy is undoubtedly alive inspite of the three Constitution Bench decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court In re, Sea Customs Act, AIR 1963 SC 1760, D. G. Gouse, AIR 1980 SC 217 and New Delhi Municipal Committee, AIR 1997 SC 2847 and the two other decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Purna Municipal Council and others, (1992) 1 SCC 100, followed in Ranchi Municipal Corporation v. State and others, C.A. No. 3646 of 1996, decided on 16.2.1996.2. Jal Sansthan, Allahabad, having been created under the provisions of U. P. Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 (for short the Water Supply Act) has issued a demand notice to the petitioner Union of India, Divisional Manager N. Rly., Allahabad and Divisional Superintending Engineer N. Rly., Allahabad, for a sum of Rs. 26,23,360.73p. as water and sewer charges. Since the demands were refused or at least not honoured by the petitioner, the Jal Sansthan have taken recourse to Section 64 of the...
Dhirendra Kumar Gupta Vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: (2001)1UPLBEC873
D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Mahesh Gautam, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri V.N. Agarwal, the learned Standing Counsel of the State of U.P. representing the respondents.2. Dhirendra Kumar Gautam, an erstwhile Jail Warden, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for impugning the two orders and judgment dated 15th July, 1998 and 24th July. 1998 passed by the U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow, copies whereof arc Annexures '6' and '8' to the petition.3. By the order and judgment dated 15th July, 1998 the Tribunal has rejected the claim petition of the petitioner and the order and judgment dated 23rd July, 1998 purports to reject the petition of the petitioner seeking review of the order and judgment dated 15th July. 1998. The prayer for quashing the orders dated 20th February. 1987 and 1st July, 1991, giving rise to the claim petition, has also been made. The order dated 20th February. 1987, a copy whereof is Annex...
Ashwani Dhingra Vs. C.B.i. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ946
ORDERKrishna Kumar, J.1. The applicant is challaned in case crime No. RC (E)/98 BS & FC/DLI under Section 120B read with Section 411/467/468/471/420 IPC.2. At the earliest, it may be stated that the investigation of this case is being done by the Central Bureau of Investigation. There is no dispute that the cause of action arose at Ghaziabad. It may also be noted that a special Court has been established at Dehradun for deciding the cases investigated by the C.B.I. for some of the districts of western Uttar Pradesh. This case is also being investigated by C.B.I. and the bail application of the applicant was rejected by the special Court situated at Dehradun.3. The applicant moved the bail application, after rejection of his bail application by the special Court C.B. at Dehradun, in this Court. The question arises whether this Court has now got jurisdiction to decide this bail application. Admittedly, the bail application was moved in this Court on 13-11-2000 while the Uttar Pradesh Reo...
Rajeev Verma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: I(2001)DMC345
ORDER1. A supplementary affidavit has been filed alongwith an application, wherein it is averred that at the instance of relatives of both the sides a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No. 4 and in the said settlement the petitioner No. 1 has paid Rs. 1,20,000/- to Smt. Sharda Devi daughter of respondent No. 4. It is further averred that as a result of the compromise, the petition filed by Smt. Sharda Devi before the Judge, Family Court, Allahabad has been dismissed on 16.10.2000 and a compromise has also been entered into between the parties in divorce suit. Sri Anil Kumar Singh has made a statement that after filing of supplementary affidavit a decree for divorce has also been passed. The fact that the parties have entered into compromise has been admitted in para 7 of the counter affidavit filed by the complainant Kamla Prasad Seth respondent No. 4.2. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of the wr...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Munshi Ram and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: II(2001)ACC70; 2002ACJ915
Shyamal Kumar Sen, C.J.1. This appeal by the insurance company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act is against the award ol the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 23.10.1998 in Claim Case No. 353 of 1996.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.3. The only point urged by the learned Counsel for the appellant in support of the appeal is that the driver of the vehicle, who caused accident, had no valid licence Such contention, in our view, is not tenable. It is well settled that the insurance company will have to establish that the insured was guilty of an irffringement or violation of a promise and the insurer has to satisfy the Tribunal or the court that such violation or infringement on the part of the insured was wilful. In this connection judgment and decision in the case of Sohan Lal Passi v. P. Sesh Reddy 1996 ACJ 1044 (SC), may be taken note of. Para 12 of the said judgment at pp. 1051-53 of the said report appears to us to be relevant for the purpose and the same...
Hidait HussaIn Vs. Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Jhansi and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC371; [2001(88)FLR910]; (2001)1UPLBEC460
V. M. Sahai, J.1. The petitioner was appointed on the post of peon in Madarsa Islamiya Jama Masjid, Jhansi, in July. 1978. He was transferred in 1993 as peon toIslamiya Oriental College, Chaniyapura, Jhansi. He is still working in the institution. He made a representation on 8.11.1999 to District Basic Education Officer, Jhansi (in brief B.S.A.) that the option given by him on 11.1.1994 to retire at the age of 58 years be not accepted. This representation was not decided. He filed Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 50620 of 1999. It was disposed of on 3.12.1999 with a direction to B.S.A. to decide his representation. He served the order on B.S.A. along with a representation dated 3.1.2000. The B.S.A. rejected his representation on 10.2.2000. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 10.2.2000. It is claimed that the petitioner is a class-IV employee. The post of peon is a Group 'D' post. The age of retirement of Group 'D' employee is 60 years, therefore, he can...
Sudhakar Srivastava Vs. Deputy Director of Education (Secondary) Faiza ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC560; (2001)1UPLBEC890
U. K. Dhaon, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.2. The brief facts of the case are that the father of the petitioner has expired on 10.9.1992 while he was in service and thereafter the widow of the deceased submitted an application on 17.9.1992 for the appointment of her son on compassionate ground under Dying-in-Harness Rules. In the said application, it was inter alto stated that son is B.A., B.Ed. The petitioner thereafter on 25.9.1992 submitted an application before the D.I.O.S. for his appointment under Dying-in-Harness Rules. The D.I.O.S. vide an order dated 9.10.1992, directed the Management of the School for appointment of the petitioner on non-teaching post and in pursuance of the said order, the Principal of the College vide order dated 12.10.1992 appointed the petitioner on the post of Assistant Clerk. The petitioner being aggrieved by the aforesaid order has approached this Court and has prayed that a writ in the nature of man...
Brahma Dutta Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC766
V. M. Sahai, J.1. The petitioner was teaching as Lecturer in Chemistry in Government Inter College, Agra. By order dated 23.8.2000, he was transferred to Government Inter College, Mainpuri, on administrative grounds. The wife of the petitioner made a representation to the Revenue Minister who wrote a letter on 19.9.2000 to the State Education Minister if he would issue orders forcancellation of petitioner's transfer. On 21.9.2000, the State Education Minister directed the Director, Madhyamik Shiksha to submit a report and cancel the transfer of the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to respondents to implement the order passed by the State Education Minister. The other relief claimed is that the respondents have deducted a sum of Rs. 1,634 from the salary of the petitioner for loss of one steel almirah without any inquiry.2. Shri R. C. Katara, the learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that once the State Education Minister...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »