Allahabad Court August 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hari Prasad Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-10-1999
Reported in: 2000CriLJ1344
M.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant Hari Prasad has been convicted by Sri V.P. Mathur the then Sessions Judge, Fatehpur by the judgement dated 16-6-1980 passed in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 1980 under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. Aggrieved, he has preferred this appeal.2. One Kalloo Lodh was murdered in this incident on 18-10-1979 at about 8 P.M. in village Khargupur Vargala within P.S. Sultanpur Ghosh, district Fatehpur. The prosecution story was that in front of the house of the accused and Chhote Lal there was some open land lying in the form of Parti. At one time it was under the cultivation of the accused but during the consolidation proceedings, the accused was allotted another land and this Parti land came to be owned by the Gaon Samaj. The deceased Kalloo and his family members started using this land for keeping their cow dung cakes and it was disliked by the accused. On two occasions prior to the occurrence, he had objected to it but to no effect. The d...
Abdul Bari Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-09-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)AWC3453
D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner was a Platoon Commander in the Home Guard. His service was terminated by an order dated March 7. 1996. This order is subject-matter of challenge in this writ petition. Mr. Rajeshwari Sahai, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was holding a civil post as has been held in the decision in the case of Surat Prasad Tewari v. Zila Commander, Hamirpur, 1998 (2) UPLBEC 1484. Therefore, his service could not be terminated withoutgiving an opportunity as has been held in the case of Jawed Ahmad a. State of U. P. and others, 1999 (1) UPLBEC 655. On these grounds, he prays that the writ petition be allowed and the impugned order be quashed.2. Mr. K. R. Singh, learned standing counsel on the other hand contends that Section 12 of the U. P. Home Guard Adhiniyam. 1963, empowers an authority to terminate the petitioner's service. He also contends that the petitioner did not hold the civil post in view of Section 10 of the said Act. He further ...
Malku and Others Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Banda and Anoth ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-09-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)AWC3217
B. Dikshit, J.1. This writ petition arises out of two objections, one being filed by petitioners Rajendra Prasad. Chunkawan and Shyam Lal while other by Ganga and Malku son of Bodhi, Rajju son of Sheodarshan. In both the objections, it was prayed that the name of respondent No. 2 Rant is farzi and. therefore, her name be deleted. The objections were contested by Smt. Rani. She claimed that she being daughter of Ram Gopal, the husband of last tenure-holder, her name is rightly recorded over disputed Khata. The petitioners disputed Smt. Rani's parentage also. They claimed that Smt. Rani is not daughter of Ram Gopal. As Consolidation Authorities finally held Smt. Rani to be daughter of Ram Gopal, the pedigree on the basis of which this petition has been contested stands settled as follows : Tulsi | ------------------------------------------------------- | | | Shiv Darshan Bodhi Chittu | | | ------------------------- | | | | | | Ram Gopal Rajju Motilal Kallu | | | Mst.Vadi (widow) -------...
Bar Association Vs. Uttar Pradesh Bar Council
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-09-1999
Reported in: (1999)3UPLBEC2087
S.H.A. Raza and Naseemuddin, JJ.1. The main thrust of the petitioner Bar Association in this writ petition is that fake Bar Associations have spread their wings in every district, as a result of which the work of the Courts is disrupted. If a particular Bar Association passes a resolution to abstain from the judicial work the another Bar Association passes a resolution to abstain from the judicial work the another Bar Association goes against it and the same has created a difficulty not only to the judicial officers but it also creates a lot of difficulty and hardship to the sincere and dedicated lawyers engaged in the process of dispensation of justice. Do to stopage of work in the Court the litigants arc the worst sufferers. Although this writ petition was filed by one Bar Association of an Outlying Court of a particular district but it is necessary that the U.P. Bar Council should devise a policy and issue guidelines which should be observed by each and even Bar Association regardin...
Bal Krishna Sahu Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Jhansi and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)AWC2636
Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ.1. Following two questions crop up for our consideration (i) whether the writ petitioner, who is party to a writ proceeding instituted by respondent No. 3 before the Lucknow Bench of the Court in which a stay order has been passed adverse to him, can claim any relief from the Principal Bench of the Court at Allahabad through this writ petition? and (ii) whether the stay order passed by the Lucknow Bench is without jurisdiction, null and void and nullity on the ground that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition of respondent No. 3.2. Firstly, very briefly the factsgiving rise to this writ petition, filedon 16.4.1991. Vide the Resolutiondated 4.12.1985 of the RegionalTransport Authority, Jhansi, whichconsidered the applications filed forgrant of 4 permanent stage carriagepermits for the route Lalitpur-Jhakoravia Rajghat for which the petitioner aswell as respondent No. 3 and otherswere applicants, one of the threepermits w...
Mumtax Ahmad Vs. Deputy Director of Education, Allahabad and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)AWC2667; (2000)1UPLBEC735
S.R. Singh, J.1. The question that arises for determination in this Special Appeal directed against the judgment of a learned single Judge is : Whether a post falling within 50% promotion quota as visualised by Regulation 5 of Chapter II of the regulations made under the U. P. Intermediate Education Act. 1921 (in short 'the Act') would automatically lapse and be deemed to have been surrendered under Regulation 20 of Chapter II if no eligible and qualified candidate is available for promotion and the Committee of Management ultimately decides, after ninety days of the occurrence of vacancy, to fill up the post by direct recruitment?2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated briefly as thus : Majidla Islamia Inter College, Allahabad, is a minority Institution. Appointment of teachers in the institution is governed by the provision of Section 16FF of the Act.A vacancy in the post of Lecturer Commerce occurred in the institution on 30.6.1990 on retirement of permanent incumbent ...
Kedar Nath Agrawal and Another Vs. District Judge, Ballia and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)AWC2884
A.K. Yog, J.1. Smt. Dhanraji Debi and Jagdeo Shah respondent Nos. 3and 4 (since dead represented by legal representatives) filed release application under Section 21 (11 (a). U. P. Urban Buildings [Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972), for short called 'the Act', contending inter alia, amongst others, that they required the shop described in the release application situate in Qasba Rasra (district Ballia) wherein petitioners were tenants at the rate of Rs. 43.75 paise per month on the ground that Jagdeo Shah had to quit Calcutta because of anti-Bengali movements and riots and that he required the shop in question for carrying on his own business along with his wife Smt. Dhanraji. Landlord also filed an application (Annexure-2 to the petition) praying that an Amin be appointed by the Court for preparing site plan, Amin submitted a report dated September 30. 1983 (page 28 of the writ paper book) along with site plan (page 32 of the writ paper b...
Rajendra Singh Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)AWC2980
D. K. Seth, J. 1. The petitioner having been selected for training was suspended on account of his involvement in a criminal case. However, by reason of an order of stay passed by this Court tn an earlier writ petition, the petitioner was permitted to continue with the training. During the course of training, the petitioner was unauthorisedly absent without leave for a long period. Therefore, he could not complete the training along with his batchmates. However, the period of training was extended as a good gesture by the respondents. After the training is over, in the overall assessment of the concerned officer, the petitioner was found unfit for being offered employment for which he was relieved. The petitioner had moved a Writ Petition No. 3900 of 1993, which was disposed of on 14th July, 1995, challenging the said denial of employment. In the said judgment, it was found that thebatchmates of the petitioner were called for Interview but the petitioner was denied the opportunity of i...
Km. Rakhi and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, Firozabad and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-05-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)AWC323
D.K. Seth, J. 1. The order dated 22nd March, 1996 passed by 1st Additional District Judge. Firozabad in Misc. Appeal No. 65 of 1995 affirming the order dated 16th September, 1995 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Firozabad in Succession Case No. 74 of 1990 is under challenge in this civil revision. 2. Mr. A.Y. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner had assailed the impugned order on the ground that the finding of both the Courts below suffers from perversity. The conclusions arrived at are based on no material. That apart, he further contends that the Court, which have granted the Succession Certificate did not have territorial jurisdiction. The learned trial court had overruled thesaid objection without adverting to the materials on record and the legal proposition. Whereas the learned lower appellate court had referred to the said objection but did not decide the same nor it had adverted to the objection so raised. He further contends that though such objection was not ...
Ghanshyam Das Saksena Vs. U.P. Sahkari Sansthagat Sewa Mandal and Othe ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-05-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)AWC2658; (1999)3UPLBEC2330
V.M. Sahai, J.1. The question for consideration in this petition is whether the order dismissing the petitioner, a Manager of a Cooperative Bank was in accordance with law.2. The petitioner was initially appointed as Typist-cum-Clerk in the bank on 1.10.1953 and was promoted as Branch Manager on 1.1.1972. He was suspended on 14.1.1986. On 27.12.1986 an enquiry officer was appointed who issued a charge-sheet to him on 25.2.1987. He was dismissed on 8.5.1989. He claimed that the copies of documents which were to be relied against him were not provided along with the charge-sheet, nor papers relating to loan given to Smt. Kailashi Devi and the vouchers of Sri A. K. Bajpayee were provided to him. He further claimed that he was not given opportunity to cross-examine the Bank Manager and the witnesses, therefore, he could not defend himself and the enquiry proceedings were contrary to principles of natural Justice. On 10.8.1988, a show cause notice was given to the petitioner which was repli...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »