Allahabad Court July 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahesh Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-05-1999
Reported in: 2000CriLJ1334
ORDERB.K. Sharma, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 4-3-1997 passed by Sri S.C. Agarwal, the then 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Banda in Special Case No. 26 of 1996, State v. Mahesh whereby he convicted the accused-appellant Mahesh of the offence under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year more.2. The prosecution case was that Chandra Mani Pandey, the then Station Officer, G.R.P., Banda was present in the night of 13-6-1995 alongwith Head Constable Ram Kripal Yadav on train escort checking and law and order duty at the Railway Station, Banda; that at that time he received an information from an informer that two persons, who deal with Charas, are sitting with Charas on the cement bench under the tin shed at platform No. 2 of the station; that ...
Mukhtar Ansari Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation S.i.V. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-05-1999
Reported in: 2000CriLJ68
ORDERO.P. Garg, J. 1. A highly vexed question whether a revision application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was (for short the 'Code') lies before the High Court at Allahabad of its Bench at Lucknow is the subject matter of this designation. The complex question sometimes is the product of the vested interest. More often then not, the conflict of territorial jurisdiction is sharpened stark when the impugned order is passed, by a Court located in either of the twelve districts of Avadh. The controversy in turn involves interpretation in its true perspective, of the provisions of the United Provinces High Court's (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Amalgamation Order), particularly the provisions of clause 14. The complex question has travelled more than once up to the Apex Court. This question has again been raised before this Court in the following circumstances :2. A devil daring and horrendous crime was committed in Ravindra Puri, Jawahar ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›