Allahabad Court November 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Manju Bala Chaubey Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)AWC85
G.P. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing of the appointment of Smt. Neelam Singh (respondent No. 6) as distributor of LPG at Maniyar in district Ballia. The parties have exchanged affidavits and with their consent, the writ petition ts being disposed of finally at the admission stage.2. The Indian Oil Corporation, Northern Zone, (hereinafter referred to as the IOC) issued an advertisement in the newspapers for appointment of distributor of Indane Gas (LPG) at Maniyar in district of Ballia and some other places. It was also mentioned in the advertisement that the distributorship is reserved for women. In response to the advertisement, the petitioner Smt. Manju Bala Chaubey moved an application in prescribed proforrna along with a bank draft of Rs. 500. The petitioner and thirty four other candidates were called to appear for an interview before the Dealer Selection Board, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the Selection Board). T...
CaptaIn Dushyant Somal Vs. Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Bombay and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1999
Reported in: 2000(2)AWC905; [2000(84)FLR866]; (2000)1UPLBEC138
Ravi S. Dhavan, J.1. The only aspect which the Court has to examine in this appeal is whether the Judgment on the writ petition is in error or not.2. The Court has heard learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. S. K. Verma. Senior Advocate, and learned counsel for the respondents. Mr. S. N. Verma. Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Jayant Banerji. Advocate.3. The petitioner's services, as an Assistant Security Officer (on probation), were terminated by the Reserve Bank of India, by an order of 30 October, 1981. The powers under which the services of the petitioner had been terminated are not so relevant as the cause. Whatever be the cause, it had nothing to do with the petitioner's services within the Bank. But there is a residuary power in the Regulations of the Reserve Bank of India given a situation or a circumstance, to dispense with the services of an officer should he border on a conduct which reflects on moral turpitude. The decree of moral turpitude has been the subject-matter of s...
U.P. State Cement Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1999
Reported in: [2000]120STC46(All)
P.K. Jain, J.1. In all these four revisions the common controversy involved is whether the freight charges said to have been charged separately could be treated as part of the turnover. The revisions are, therefore, decided by a common judgment.2. The revisionist is a manufacturer of cement and in the assessment year under consideration various quantities of cements were sold. The goods were sold f.o.r. destination. The assessee's claim was, however, that railway freight which included the price of the goods was charged separately. The revisionist was not liable to tax on the turnover of freight charges. In all the assessment years it is submitted that the cement was supplied by the revisionist to various parties and price was f.o.r. destination but the contract of sale was not f.o.r. destination. Hence the amount of freight charged separately was liable to be excluded from the taxable turnover. On behalf of the assessee reliance was placed on a decision reported in [1979] 43 STC 476 (...