Allahabad Court February 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamlesh Kumar Shukla Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-1998
Reported in: (1998)1UPLBEC416
O.P. Garg, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. The petitioner is a trained apprentice. He claims appointment on the basis of decision of the Apex Court reported in 1995 JT (2) SC 26 : (1995) 1 UPLBEC 320 (SC), U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. v. U.P. Parivahan Nigam Shishukhs Berozgar Sangh and Ors.3. The writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that that respondents shall consider the question of appointment of the petitioner on some suitable post in view of the eligibility and qualifications of the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid observations of the Supreme Court provided the selection for recruitment is likely to take place in near future.4. Appropriate order shall be passed within two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the respondents....
Class Iv Employees Association, High Court of Judicature, Through, Its ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-1998
Reported in: (1998)2UPLBEC1059
O.P. Garg, J.1. With a view to espouse the cause and vindicate the grievances of its members, the Class IV Employees Association of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and its Secretary, Manbodh Yadav, have knocked the doors of this Court in inordinate and compelling circumstances by filing the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian to mandate the State Government of Uttar Pradesh not to back out from its commitment made and resolution adopted to accord post to post parity-in the matter of grant of pay scales which are admissible to their counterparts in Delhi High Court, w.e.f. 1.1.1986.2. In its historical retrospect, the employees of this Court were always treated as inferior to the employees of the State Secretariat in the matter of pay scales. It was only in the year 1968 that, to ameliorate, to some extent the conditions of the employees of this Court, there was revision in the pay structure and it was brought at par with the staff of the State Secreta...
Jamila Begum, Pradhan Vs. State of U. P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)AWC845; (1998)2UPLBEC929
S.R. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Anurag Khanna, learned counsel for the petitionerand learned standing counsel for the opposite parties.2. Impugned herein is the order dated 16.12.1997, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. In addition to the prayer of issue of a writ of certforort quashing the impugned order, the petitioner has also made a prayer for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to register First Information Report against him.3. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that some complaint was made against the petitioner who la the Pradhan of the concerned Gram Panchayat, regarding misappropriation of Gaon Sabha property, viz., trees situate on plots mentioned in the Impugned order. It appears that on the said complaint some enquiry was held by the Additional District Magistrate (Administration) pursuant to an order dated 29.10.1997 of the District Magistrate and an enquiry report dated 7.11,1997 was submitted. Considering the sai...
Sandeep Palace, Gopiganj Vs. Commissioner, Entertainment Tax, U.P., Lu ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)AWC959
D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Anjani Kumar, learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner and Shri Vinay Malviya, learned standing counsel representing the respondents.2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly agree and pray that this petition may be disposed of finally at the admission stage itself, Accordingly, the Courtproceeds to do so.3. By means of the impugned order dated 13th November, 1997, a copy whereof is Annexure-2 to the writ petition, an enquiry under Section 15 of the U. P. Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1979, hereinafter called the Act. has been initiated against the petitioner, and tn exercise of powers under sub-section (2) of Section 15 of the Act, the licence of the petitioner for exhibiting cinematograph films has been suspended during pendency of the enquiry.4. Under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Act, the licence of a licensee for exhibiting cinematograph films can be revoked or suspended by way of punishment for a period not exceeding three months, afte...
Madan Mohan Lal Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)AWC1042; (1998)2UPLBEC1451
O.P. Garg, J. 1. By means of the writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that the order dated 12.3.1996 passed by respondent No. 2, Senior Superintendent of District Jail, Meerut, compulsory retiring the petitioner from service. Annexure-6 to the writ petition, be quashed and the respondents, be commanded to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits.2. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged.3. Heard Sri Satish Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel.4. The petitioner Madan Mohan Lal Gupta was appointed as a Constable in Jail Department in the year 1959. His correct date of birth is 10.9.1941. At the relevant time, he was working as Jail Warder (Bandi Rakshak) in District Jail, Muzaffarnagar. He was not found fit for promotion to the post of Chief Jail Warder (Mukhya Bandi Rakshak) and ultimately by order dated 12.3.1996 on the basis of the report of the Screening Co...
Hari Lal Vs. Balvantia and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)AWC1069
R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. Facts, in brief, giving rise to this appeal are that plaint iff-respondent No. 1 Balwantiya (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), filed a suit on 25. 11.1980 against Shiv Bachan (now deceased) claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500 per month and she also prayed that a charge of the amount of maintenance be created against the property mentioned at the bottom of the plaint- It was further prayed that the defendant husband may be restrained by a permanent injunction from transferring the property. The property shown is agricultural property covering an area of 4.345 hectares, situate in village Sarai Dhani, Pargana and Tahsil Sagdi, district Azamgarh. This suit was filed in forma pauperis and thus initially it was registered as Misc. Case No. 233 of 1980. The application of respondent No. 1 to sue as indigent person was allowed by order dated 2.4.1990. The order was challenged in Civil Revision No. 80 of 1990 which was dismissed on 16.10.1993. Thereafter, the ...
Smt. Shanta Bahukhandi Vs. Basic Shiksha Adhikari and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)AWC1280; (1998)3UPLBEC2124
M. Katju, J. 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned transfer order dated 13.7.93 Annexure-1 to the writ petition. By that order, the petitioner has been transferred from Padampur to Kanya Junior High School. Garvani. By an interim order of this Court dated 13.8.93, impugned order dated 13.7.93 had been stayed.3. In para 4 of the counter-affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioner has been transferred from a Boys Junior High School to a Girls Junior High School as it has been decided that only male teachers shall be posted in the Boys schools.4. In my opinion, this policy is wholly arbitrary and hence violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. In this modem age, to say that only male teachers will teach in a Boys schools is, in my opinion, wholly unreasonable and arbitrary. There is no basis of saying that only male teachers can teach well in Boys schools. In fact, lady teachers are even teaching grown up boys in Unive...
Harsh Vardhan Agarwal and ors. Vs. Director General, Indian Council of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: (1998)2UPLBEC1423
O.P. Garg, J.1. To combat a menace of breeding of mosquitoes which by itself a health hazard of mosquitoes which by itself is a health hazard throughout the country, Malaria Research Centre (for short 'MRC') with headquarters at New Dehli was constituted under the aegis of the Indian Council of Medical Research f ICMR' for brevity), which is a Society, registered under the Societies Registration Act No. XXI of 1860. In course of time MRC spread its wings throughout the length and breadth of the country and field stations were opened at various places in India to facilitate research work by expert research scientists to study the causes of the biological growth of various malpractices, their control and eradication, and by the very nature of the work, the operational area of these fields-was villages. These parasites are found in large numbers where enormous pits .and ponds filled up with dirty water, specially during the rainy season and the research scientists are aided t(r) collect s...
Sushil Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998CriLJ2848
ORDER1. Heard Sri R.K. Awasthi and Sri R.K. Jain for the petitioner and Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned AGA, for State.2. Through this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner had prayed for a writ or order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus for his production before the Hon'ble Court and for his being set at liberty from detention under the National Security Act (for short the Act). The petitioner was detained under an order of the District Magistrate, Haridwar, dated 21-5-97 in exercise of its powers under Section 3(2) read with Section 3(3) of the Act for preventing him to act in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.3. Certain dates are relevant for a decision on the present petition. The order of detention was passed against him on 21-5-97 and he was served with the grounds of detention along with the detention order. A copy of the detention order is annexed to the writ petition as annexure-1 and the grounds therefor are t...
State of U.P. Vs. JalaluddIn and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1998
Reported in: 1998CriLJ4194
1. The two respondents stood charged under Sections 302/34, I.P.C. and 307/ 34, I.P.C. in S.T. No. 507 of 1976 before the Sessions Judge, Azamgarh and they were acquitted by the trial Judge by his judgment dated 29-10-77. After the appeal was admitted this Court directed issuance of bailable warrant against the respondents. It appears that the respondent Jalal Uddin failed to appear in time in terms of the bailable warrant and subsequently he was arrested and he was detained in custody. But subsequently an order dated 26-3-96 recorded by a Division Bench of this High Court he was granted bail. The other respondent is on bail.2. The case against them was started on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged at police station Gambhirpur by Kishwari, daughter of Mohammad Amin of Maqdoompur. It was stated in the F.I.R. that the complainant Smt. Keshwari and her mother Smt. Masruful and brother Ali Raja and some children were sleeping in the second storey verandah of their house on the night between 21/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »