Allahabad Court September 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Kiran Kumari and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)AWC359; (1997)3UPLBEC1743
Sudhir Narain, J.1. The petitioners seek writ of mamdamus commanding the respondents to treat the educational certificate recognised by the Madhya Pradesh Government known as Buniyadi Prashikshan Patropadhi Course as qualification equal to B.T.C. Course. The petitioners 1 to 8 claim that they completed their Basic Training Certificate Course (Bunlyadi Prashikshan Pramanpatra) awarded by the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. The petitioners No, 9 to 79 have been enrolled in the sessions 1995 to 1997 and have appeared in the final examination in the month of June but the result is still awaited.2. The respondents advertised certain vacancies in the daily newspaper 'Dainik Jagran' dated 17.8.1997 for the post of Assistant Teacher in the Junior Basic Schools in district Sonbhadra. The advertisement lays down certain eligibility conditions for a candidate to be eligible for applying for the post. Thelast date for submission of the application was fixed to be 31...
Ved Prakash Joshi Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)AWC458; (1997)3UPLBEC1937
O.P. Garg, J. 1. The petitioner--Ved Prakash Joshi has approached this Court by means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution with the prayer that the order dated 2.8.1983, Annexure 2 to the writ petition, passed by Dr. B. P. Sharma, Upper Siksha Nideshak (Madhyamik), respondent No. 2 be quashed and the respondents be directed to treat the petitioner as Assistant Teacher, English in the Government Inter College, Chakrata, District Dehradun.2. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been filed Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sabhajit Yadav, learned standing counsel for the respondents.3. Admittedly, the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in English subject in the year 1971 by the Deputy Director of Education (for short 'D.D.E.') Hills. Nainital on temporary basis. The petitioner continued to work on the said post for a period of about 12 years and during this period he had earned as many as 6 or 7 adverse entries, whi...
HakimuddIn Vs. Mohammad Anis, Representing Mst. Sabbirunnisan (Since D ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)AWC476
D.C. Srivastava, J.1. This is defendant's second appeal. Brief facts essential for disposal of this appeal are as under :2. The deceased-plaintiff, Smt. Sabbirunnisan, filed a suit for cancellation of two sale-deeds dated 7.5.1960 and 4.6.1960 and also for recovery of possession of the subject-matter of sale-deeds and for recovery of Rs. 800 as damages. The allegations in the plaint were that by virtue of inheritance explained in the plaint the deceased-plaintiff. Smt. Sabbirunnisan held 13/48 share in the plots detailed in schedule 'A' and residential house detailed in schedule 'C' and half share in occupancy plots detailed in schedule 'E' of the plaint. Hakimuddin, the original defendant No. 1, was cousin of Mohammad Anls. He occasionally visited the village and resided with Sabbirunnisan. Sabbirunnisan was illiterate Pardanasin lady aged about 65 to 70 years. She had eye trouble. Hakimuddtn took her to Allahabad on the pretext that he will consult some eye specialist for the treatme...
Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, U.P., Lucknow and Other ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)AWC468; (1998)2UPLBEC830
O.P. Garg, J.1. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged. Heard Sri B. D. Mandhyan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rajeshji Verma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 as well as the learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 3. The order dated 8.3.1995, passed by State Public Services Tribunal. U. P.. Lucknow, in Claim Petition No. 3T/III/88 preferred by Sri Anand Prakash Misra--respondent No. 2 quashing his dismissal order dated 28.7.1983 has given rise to the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent No. 2 was appointed as Clerk In Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Chibramau, district Farrukhabad and took over charge on 28.1.1981. There were serious allegations against him to the effect that he had squandered the market fee, which he had collected through the farmers ; he was retaining the receipt books and other documents with him. The respondent No. 2 lodged an F...
MainuddIn and Others Vs. State of U. P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)AWC642; 1998CriLJ2109
P. K. Jain, J.1. Revisionists Mainuddin, Quamuddin and Jainuddin have filed the present revision challenging the judgment and order of Judicial Magistrate, Eastern Railway. Moghalsarai, Varanasi, dated 29.3.1986 whereby the revisionists were convicted under Section 3A of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and were sentenced to undergo 2 years' R.I. and the judgment and order In Criminal Appeal No. 64 of 1986 arising out of the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate, Eastern Railway. Moghalsarai. Varanasi whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgment and order of the trial court was confirmed.2. Briefly stated the facts are that on 3.2.78 an Information was received at R.P.F. outpost Moghalsarai that stolen railway property is stored in the shop of Mainuddin near Alinagar petrol pump. On this information S.I. Virendra Singh accompanied by Raj Deo Mishra, Virendra Kumar Shukla and others proceeded to the shop of Mainuddin....
Parmod Goel and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)AWC690
O. P. Jain, J.1. By this writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek the relief of certiorari quashing Notifications dated 15th July, 1978 and 17th July, 1978 issued under Section 4 and under Section 6 read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called the Act), published in the Gazette on 4.11.1978. Copies of the notifications are Annexure-10 and Annexure-10A annexed to the petition. The petitioners further seek quashing of the award dated 18th March, 1980 given by the S.LAO.2. The brief facts of the case are that the State Government issued the notifications for the acquisition of about one acre of land which was required for the construction of Gangoh bye-pass road in Saharanpur district. The Notifications dated 15th July, 1978 and 17th July, 1978 were published in the Gazette on 4th November, 1978 and ihe award was given by the S.L.A.O. on 18th March, 1980. The petitioners never raised any objection at any stage ...
Town Area Committee Vs. Sr. Superintendent of Police and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: AIR1998All251; (1998)1UPLBEC385
Ravi S. Dhavan, J. 1. This is a strange case of a local body, the Town Area Committee, Naraini, Banda, filing a writ petition before the High Court challenging the order, in effect, of the State of Uttar Pradesh, when it was asked not to construct shops on the roadside as it is against the law. The Town Area Committee instead of cleaning up the road so that it is available without obstruction for the purpose for which it is laid, that is, for passage or highway traffic saw arrangements to block and construct the Naraini Uttara Marg, by constructing temporary kiosks, Gumtis and shops. Not only this, thereafter, the Town Area Committee proceeded to make the constructions permanent.2. This met with resistance from the Superintendent of Police, Banda, who tried to persuade the Town Area Committee that the constructions are on the side of the road and this would affect (a) the passage, (b) the Police Station behind it and (c) a Fire Brigade Station. The Town Area Committee would hear none o...
Ram Kumar Sonkar and ors. Vs. Zila Nirvachan Adhikari/Zila Adhikari an ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: (1997)3UPLBEC1850
D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioners were engaged on daily wage basis initially for a period of four months by an order dated 16-10-1995 which is Annexure-1 to the writ petition for the purpose of performing certain duties related to election. Thereafter they were permitted to work tilt 28-2-1997 after which the petitioners are not permitted to work.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners Shri Rajeev Kumar Srivastava contends that the petitioners service were terminated in violation of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Dispute Act without giving any notice or pay in lie of the notice, therefore, the said order of termination can net be sustained. The petitioners having been appointed for 4 months had been allowed to work therefore by reason thereof they have acquired the right to continue in the post, He further relies on the letter dated 30-7-1997, Annexure-18 to the writ petition, issued by the District Magistrate who had recommended for continuance of the petitioners work, contends that ...
Harjeet Singh Sandhu Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: (1997)3UPLBEC2015
O.P. Jain, J.1. The petitioner, Captain Harjeet Singh Sandhu, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari and quashing the order dated 2nd January, 1984 by which his services has been terminated. The order is Annexure-VIII to the petition.2. The brief facts of the case are that in the night intervening 27th and 28th March, 1978, the petitioner along with three other Officers interrogated One Bhagwan Dass, who was also a defence employee, in connection with an incident of theft During the course of the interrogation the petitioner and his other associates used third degree methods in order to extract a confession. As a result of the force used, Bhagwan Dass died. The petitioner along with three other Officers were tried by General Court Martial (G.C.M,) and verdict of guilty was given on 22nd December, 1978 vide Annexure-l The petitioner was awarded the sentence to forfeiture of three years serv...
Anil Kumar Verma Vs. State of U.P. Through Dy. Secretary, Education an ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: (1997)3UPLBEC1896
D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis in 1989 and he had worked till 1992. Thereafter his services having been discontinued, a writ petition was moved alongwith several others, being Writ Petition No. 36846 of 1992 which is still pending. In the said order It was pointed out that if any appointment is mode by the respondent No. 2 the petitioner shall be given preference for appointment unless there are specific charges against any of the petitioner. By reason of the said order the petitioner was given fresh appointment in 1995 and it is alleged that he had continued till 10 7-1997. But subsecuently his payment of wages has been stopped,2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner claims that he may be permitted to continue till regularly selected candidate in Class III post joins and that his work may not be interfered with and that his case may be considered for regularisation.3. Sri Madan Mohan Lal Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits th...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »