Allahabad Court June 1997 Judgments
Om Prakash Yadav Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Judicatu ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-12-1997
Reported in: (1997)3UPLBEC1955
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri Wajahat Hussain and Sri Ashok Bhushan learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.M.A. Kazmi, learned Special Counsel representing the respondents.2. Perused the record.3. The Special Counsel representing the respondents has produced for the perusal of the Court, the original order passed by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice dated 22-5-1997 published in the cause list of the Court on 29-5-1997 as well as the earlier order passed by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. S. Sodhi, the then Chief Justice.4. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the order of the Hon'ble the Chief Justice referred to herein above published in the cause list of the Court on 29 5-1997 and has approached this Court seeking quashing of the said order.5. The petitioner had been placed under suspension vide an order dated 7-5-1997, which is claimed to have been served upon him on 29-5-1997. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order placing him under suspension he challenged the same by means of Civil ...
Tag this Judgment!Committee of Management, Dev Nagri Post Graduate College Vs. Vice-chan ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-11-1997
Reported in: (1998)1UPLBEC468
S.R. Singh, J.1. Petitioner has entered the portals of this Court challenging the impugned order (Annexure 30) passed by the Vice-Chancellor, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, whereby the Vice-Chancellor has revoked the suspension order dated 9.3.97, passed by the Management Committee, D.N. (PG) College, Meerut, of course, qualifying it with a proviso that the on-going disciplinary enquiry against the 3rd respondent-Dr. P.C. Pachuari, suspended Principal of the College, may go on.2. The Petition was presented in the Registry on 4th June, 1997 with a concommitant application for interim relief in addition to a separate application attended with an affidavit, unfolding therein the urgency for the matter to heard in the course of vacation. On the urgency application, the learned Senior Vacation Judge seripted the following order :'5.6.97Registry does not find the case to be urgent. Report of the Registry is upheld. Petition may come up after vacation.Sd-DS SinhaSr. Vacation Judge...
Tag this Judgment!Haji Nihal Ahmad and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-11-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ2082
ORDERO.P. Garg, J.1. Heard learned counsel Sri Sunil Kumar for the applicants, learned A.G.A. on behalf of the State of U.P. and learned counsel Sri R. B. Sahai for the opposite party No. 2.2. In this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is prayed that the entire proceedings in Crime case No. 702 of 1996 - State v. Haji Nihal Ahmad, under Sections 308/323/504, IPC, Police Station Khurja Nagar, District Bulendshahr pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, Bulandshahr be quashed/stayed.3. The opposite party No. 2, namely, Mohd. Sualeh lodged an FIR under Ss. 452/323/504, IPC (case crime No. 483/1995) on 9-10-1995 at Police Station Kotwali Khurja Nagar, District Bulandshahr. After investigation of the case, a charge sheet has been submitted under Ss. 308/ 323/504, IPC.4. Smt. Naushad Parveen daughter of applicant No. 1 Haji Nihal Ahmad was married to Haji Giyas Mohd. who happened to be the real brother of first informant Mohd. Su...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›