Allahabad Court June 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Sharda Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., Nunaihi Vs. Authority/Superinten ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-30-1994
Reported in: AIR1994All386
ORDER1. M/s. Sharda Oil Industries Private Limited, Nunai,hi district Agra -- the petitioner in this writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution is a private limited company registered as such under the Companies Act. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing mustered oil and for that purpose it runs a factory operated by electricity. The sanctioned load of electricity connection No. 123S77/H.V.-2 is admittedly 350 K.VA. The petitioner is thus a 'consumer' within the meaning of the term defined in Regulation 2(b) of the Electric Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations).2. The main reliefs sought for in thispetition are for issuance of a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 19-8-1993 passed by the 1st respondent and the bill dated 1-1-1993 issued by the 2nd respondent (Annexures-19 and 10 respectively to the writ petition) and a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refund Rs.4,41,000/- al...
Girdhari Lal Vs. District Magistrate
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-28-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ3496
ORDERS.N. Sahay, J.1. This writ petition is directed against an order of District Magistrate, Shahjahanpur dated April 19, 1994 for detaining the petitioner under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for the sake of brevity).2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has urged in support of the writ petition that from a perusal of the grounds of detention furnished to the petitioner, vide Annuxure-3, it will appear that on the basis of two incidents, that are said to have taken place on January 19, 1992 and March 1, 1994. the District Magistrate felt satisfied that it was necessary to detain the petitioner under Section 3(1) of the Act. It is stated that the incidence of January 19, 1992 is not proximate and cannot constitute a reasonable basis for forming subjective satisfaction with regard to the detention of the petitioner. If that incident is excluded out of consideration, ...
Maharaj Deen and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-06-1994
Reported in: 1996CriLJ506
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the order of conviction and sentence passed by IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Gonda in Sessions Trial No. 322 of 1977 convicting both the appellants for an offence under Section 302/14 IPC -and sentencing each of them to undergo imprisonment for life for committing murder of Mangal in the night of 27/28-5-76 in village Pathanjet h/o Mancharjet, P.S. Kharaupur, District Gonda.2. Prosecution story is as follows:-On 28-5-76 Chhotey Lal Chowkidar got information in the morning that a dead body was lying in village Pathanjet in a field. He along with other persons went there and saw a naked dead body lying in a field. No one could, however, identify the said dead body. The information about the same was given by Chhotey Lal Chowkidar by lodging FIR Ext. Ka 6 at P.S. Khargapur at about 14 hours. The case was taken up by SI Thakur Pd. Pandey for investigation. He along with other police personnel reached the spot in the evening and prepared Panc...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›