Allahabad Court March 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganesh Chandra Bhatt Vs. District Magistrate, Almora and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-12-1993
Reported in: AIR1993All291
ORDER1. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for grant of a license for a Revolver, and to issue him the said license under the Arms Act, 1959. On 17-2-1993, I had granted three weeks' time to the Learned Standing Counsel for filing counter affidavit.but as yet no counter affidavit has been filed. Hence I am treating the allegations in the petition to be correct and am disposing of the petition finally.2. I have heard Shri Namwar Singh, Learned counsel for the petitioner, and Learned Standing Counsel.3. The petitioner applied for a license for a Revolver on 27-6-1990 for his personal security as well as security of his property. A true copy of the said application is Annexure-1 to the petition. The petitioner has stated that he is a peace loving citizen with good antecedents, and he has never been involved in any offence. He owns a bus under a valid permit, a factory, and landed property. He cl...
Abbas Wazir Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and Others.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-05-1993
Reported in: [1993]205ITR457(All); [1993]71TAXMAN439(All)
V. N. KHARE J. - The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of carpets. For the assessment year 1982-83, the petitioner was assessed towards income-tax by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Varanasi. In the year 1986, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment for the year 1982-83, and one of the grounds for reopening the assessment was that the bonus paid by the assessee to its workmen was in excess of the amount permissible under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. By the order dated March 22, 1987, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment) reassessed the income of the petitioner for the assessment year 1982-83. Aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Varanasi. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) by order dated March 24, 1988, partly allowed the appeal. The Commissioner of Income-tax allowed the claim of the petitioner regarding payment of bonus at the rate of 20...
Eastern U.P. Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Allahabad and Others Vs ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1993
Reported in: AIR1993All309
ORDERKenia, J.1. Industrial consumers of electricity falling within the category of 'heavy and large power consumers' and 'small and medium power consumers' receiving supply of electricity from the U. P. State Electricity Board (hereinafter, for the sake of convenience, referred to as 'the Board'), have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the new tariffs enforced by the Board with effect from the 17th of October, 1989 through notification dated the 21st of April, 1990, bearing number 1287-HC/SEB/ V/1974-1204 C/90.2. The dispute in these petitions is confined to the rate schedule for the categories LMV-6, HV-1 and MV-2.3. The Board is a statutory body constituted under Section 5 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (hereinafter, for the sakeof brevity, referred to as 'the Act'. The Act has been enacted to provide for regularisation of the production and supply of electricity and generally for taking measures conducive to electrical developm...
Awadesh Singh Vs. Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1993
Reported in: (1993)IILLJ560All; (1993)2UPLBEC1005
S.R. Singh, J. 1. By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has sought the relief of issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to assume his duties as a permanent seasonal weighment clerk/sheet writer in the Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ghosi, District Mau (herein after referred as the Mills) and to pay him wages/ salary due since November 8, 1991 in the clerical grade IV.2. It transpires from the record that the petitioner was engaged as sheet writer/weighment clerk in the crushing season 1988-89 and worked in that capacity at Purchase Centres of the Mill even during the following crushing seasons 1989-90 as well as 1990-91. He claims to have worked in that capacity during whole of the second halves of the aforesaid seasons. His case is that he is entitled to be treated as permanent seasonal employee of the Mills under the provisions of the Standing Orders, 1988 issued by t...
Tribhuwan Tiwari Vs. Shiv Kumar Tiwari and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ2407; II(1993)DMC4
R.B. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Habeas Corpus petition has been filed on behalf of minor Tribhuwan Tiwari aged about 8 years through his mother Smt. Vidyawati W/o Ram Bali Tiwari, praying for a direction to the opposite parties, Sri Shiv Kumar Tiwari and Sri Ram Bali Tiwari to handover the boy from their custody to the custody of the mother, Smt. Vidyawati.2. Smt. Vidyawati was legally wedded to the opposite party No. 2 Sri Ram Bali Tiwari according to the Hindu rites and customs and were living together as husband and wife at the residence of opposite party No. 2. The case of Smt. Vidyawati is that she conceived and produced a son about 8 years back out of her marital relations with Sri Ram Bali Tiwari, opposite party No. 2. Opposite party No. 2 Sri Ram Bali Tiwari had illicit connection with a girl of a nearby village, as such, he was illtreating the petitioner. About three years back, when the father of Smt. Vidyawati went to enquire about ill-treatment of Smt. Vidyawati, she was be...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›