Allahabad Court June 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oroos Fatima Alias Nisha and anr. Vs. Senior Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-29-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ1
ORDERVirendra Saran, J.1. The case was heard on 18-6-92 and orders were reserved.2. The present writ petition has been filed by Oroos Fatima alias Nisha and Sabeeh Haider for quashing the FIR and the investigation in Crime No. 191 of 1992 of P.S., Civil Lines, Aligarh, under Section 363/366, I.P.C.3. The petition was originally filed by Sri Prakash Chandra Srivastava and there is also a vakalatnama of Sri K.D. Tripathi but at the time when the petition came up before me Sri I.M. Khan filed his vakalatnama on behalf of Sabeeh Haider.4. The facts giving rise to the present petition are that on 5-5-92 Sri Jagdish Prasad Jain gave an information to the police regarding the disappearance of his daughter Km. Nisha Jain. Subsequently he lodged an FIR on 10-5-92 with the allegations that after the disappearance of his daughter he learnt from reliable sources that his daughter had been taken away under some deception by Sabeeh Haider, petitioner No. 2. He suspected the hand of Aslam, brother of...
Surendra Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-18-1992
Reported in: 1994CriLJ805
H.N. Tilhari, J.1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has sought the issuance of writ of habeas corpus or writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of habeas corpus directing the immediate release of the petitioner. The petitioner has also prayed for orders being issued for immediate medical aid to the detenu as well as for taking action against Raja Rampal Singh and other police personnel as well as for the orders for proper enquiry and for further orders taking action against Raja Rampal Singh and other police personnel alleged to be responsible for illegally detaining the petitioner and for causing injuries on his person as alleged by the petitioner and for any other such writ, order or direction as is deemed just and proper.2. The petitioner's case, as per allegations contained in the writ petition, is that on 11-4-1992 at 6 p.m. he has been taken away from his residence at Anandnagar, Police Station Alambagh, Lucknow, by Inspector, Police Station Qaiserbagh, Luckno...
issma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-08-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ2432
ORDERVirendra Saran, J.1. Petitioners Issma, Prem, Palla alias Yashpal, Ram Kumar and Rakam Singh are involved in Crime No. 7A of 1992 of P.S. Titron, District Saharanpur, under Sections 147, 452, 324, 323, 504, 506 and 308 I.P.C. There are cross cases and injuries have been received on both sides. The writ petition is for quashing the First Information Report and investigation and a further prayer has been orally advanced that in any case the petitioners be admitted bail the same day.2. After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel, I do not find that it is a fit case for exercising discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the First Information Report and the investigation of the present case.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners has requested that the bail application of the petitioners may be considered the same day when they surrender and make an application for bail. It is submitted by the learned Counsel that t...
Km. Rekha Mishra and Another Vs. the Board of High School and Intermed ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-05-1992
Reported in: AIR1992All330
ORDER1. The petitioners appeared at the intermediate Examination of 1991 held by Board of High School and Intermediate Examination. The petitioner No. 1 was allotted roll number 310560, while the petitioner No. 2 was allotted roll number 310443 for appearing in the said examination. Their results were however, not published. Later on they were informed that they had been found guilty of using unfair means, while answering English I paper on 20-4-1991.2. Vide the impunged order the petitioner No. 1 was informed that her examination for the year 1991 had been cancelled and she had been also debarred from appearing in the Intermediate Examination of the year 1992. The petitioners had denied the charges of using unfair means in the examination in question levelled against them and had categorically stated that unauthorised material was neither recovered from their possession nor they had any access to the said paper during the examiantion. The petitioners have challenged the action of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›