Allahabad Court July 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhoora Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-12-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ2294
B.L. Yadav, J. 1. Bhoora Singh, father-in-law of deceased Smt. Urmila has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 2854 of 1988 whereas there is a Reference No. 30 of 1988 for the confirmation of the death sentence as envisaged by provisions Section 366 of the Criminal P.C. (for short the Code). Raju alias Raghvendra Pratap Singh the husband, and Smt. Gulhari, mother-in-law of deceased Smt. Urmila have also preferred appeal against the judgment dated 9-12-1988 passed by Sri U.K. Khare, III Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, convicting the appellant Bhoora Singh under Section 498A, I.P.C. and sentencing him to 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/- and further convicting him under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and sentencing him to imprisonment for 6 months and a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default to undergo imprisonment for 3 months, and convicting appellants Raju alias Raghvendra Pratap Singh and Gulhari Devi alias Champa Devi (husband and mother-in-law respectively of the decease...
Raja Ram Garg Vs. Chhanga Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-12-1991
Reported in: II(1994)ACC18
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. This revision petition has been referred to a Division Bench by one of us (R.R.K. Trivedi, J.). The question for consideration is whether further proceedings in the motor accident claim petition be stayed pending disposal of die criminal case.2. The petitioner is the driver of a truck bearing registration No. UTW 4700. Crime Case No. 230 of 1988, P.S. Raipura, District Banda, was registered against him under Section 397, Indian Penal Code, with the allegation that he attempted to kill Pardeep Singh Sengar, Station House Officer of the said Police Station. After the death of the injured, the offence was converted into one under Section 302, Indian Penal Code. The allegation, in short, is that the petitioner while driving the said truck intentionally hit the motor cycle on which Pardeep Singh Sengar was travelling and caused him serious injuries, which ultimately led to his death. We are told that the case has been committed and is now numbered as Sessions Trial N...
Raj Kumar Singh Vs. University of Allahabad and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-11-1991
Reported in: AIR1991All307; (1991)2UPLBEC1012
ORDER1. This is a writ petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certibrari quashing the order in Annexure-IV communicated by the Deputy Registrar University of Allahabad, cancelling the petitioner Raj Kumar Singh's result of B.A. Part II examination of 1990, for issue of direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to declare the petitioner's result of B.A. Part II examination of 1990 and to allow the petitioner to appear in B.A. Part III examination of 1990.2. The facts of the case briefly stated are that the petitioner appeared in B.A. Part II examination held by the respondents in year 1990. The roll number allotted to him was 44160. On 21-7-90 the petitioner was appearing in the examination of first paper of Philosophy and was busy in answering thequestions in the copy supplied to him. A flying squad entered the room. It appears that some other student silting in the same room threw away ...
Afsar Mian Vs. Labour Court and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-11-1991
Reported in: [1991(63)FLR721]; (1994)IIILLJ589All
S.R. Singh, J.1. This writ petition at the instance of a workman is directed against the Award dated 30th October, 1979 delivered by Labour Court, Bareilly in Adjudication Case No. 2 of 1979 between the petitioner on one hand and M/s. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. Fatehganj West, Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as the Employer of the Workman) on the other.2. The dispute referred to by the State Government under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act for adjudication to the Labour Court, in substance, was whether the Employer was justified in terminating the petitioner's services with effect from 23rd September, 1977 on account of his absence from duty within eight days of extended period of leave.3. The facts which emerge from the pleadings of the parties are that the petitioner was employed in the respondent's company initially on temporary basis in the year 1963 and thereafter, he was appointed on probation as a Fitter 'C' by means of an order dated 26.7.1966 of the Factor...
State of U.P. Vs. Ram Chandra and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-11-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ418
H.C. Mital, J.1. State has preferred this appeal against the order of acquittal, dated 8-8-78, passed by Sri G. D. Chaturvedi, the then Additional Sessions Judge, Jaunpur, acquitting the abovenamed respondents Under Sections 302 and 307 both read with Section 34, IPC.2. The facts leading to the prosecution of the respondents in the present case were that an incident had taken place on 20-7-71 at about 6.00 p.m. in front of Bhola Temple in village Dhania Mau, police station Baksha, district Jaunpur where a Mela was being held and at that time Deoraj and Deo Narain after getting down from the Bus proceeded for Darshan towards the Bhola Temple where at that time Bansraj, the complainant, Raghunath and Raj Narain, the two deceased, were present near the temple. After a few minutes Ram Chandra Moti Lal and Jagat Niwas also reached there Ram Chandra and Moti Lal were armed with knives and Jagar Niwas with a Karauli and at the instigation of Moti Lal, Jagar Niwas gave a Karauli blow to Deo Na...
Mangaroo Vs. the State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-11-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ1397
N.L. Ganguli, J.1. This is an application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the order of the learned revisional Court dismissing the revision barred by limitation.2. In a criminal complaint under Sections 322 (sic), 147, 504, I.P.C., the applicant, Mangaroo, along with 3 of his family members were arrayed as accused persons. The notices were issued. The personal attendance of all the accused persons were exempted by the order of the Court. The complaintant of the case moved an application for cancelling the order exempting the personal attendance of the accused, Mangaroo, who in fact is employed in Middle-East at Dubai. The personal attendance of the accused was exempted and he left India for joining the service at Dubai without obtaining prior permission of the Court. Therefore, an application for cancellation of exemption of personal attendance of applicant was moved which was allowed. Notices were issued for personal appearance in the Court. Since the applicant...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kamla Town Trust
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-10-1991
Reported in: (1992)102CTR(All)45; [1992]198ITR191(All)
K.P. Singh, J.1. This reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been made by the Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Kanpur, and the following questions have been referred for the opinion of this court :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding : (1) that the Income-tax Officer had not properly interpreted and implemented the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in I. T. A. No. 427 of 1974-75 dated August 13, 1975, and (2) that, while giving effect to the above order of the Tribunal, which had become final, the Income-tax Officer could not have recomputed the total income of the assessee in the manner in which he did it, vide the impugned order.' 2. The assessee is a trust which derives income from property, interest and share income from a firm, Messrs. J.K., Calcutta. It had claimed exemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Th...
Sangat Singh Vs. Commissioner, Kumaun Division and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-10-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ1596
D.P.S. Chauhan, J.1. The petitioner was a licensee in respect of a revolver (Licence No. 3794/DM/Ghazipur/1975) and a D.B.B.L. gun (Licence No. 8024/122-G Bazpur). In the night between 12/13-3-1982 decaoits raided his house. He used his firearms in his self defence. This user of the firearms in self defence has resulted in revocation of his firearms licenses.2. By means of this petition under Article 226 of the constitution the petitioner has challenged the order dated 4-2-1984 passed by the District Magistrate, Nainital (hereinafter referred to as 'the District Magistrate') revoking the aforesaid firearms licenses and the order dated 4-2-1985 passed in appeal thereagainst by the Commissioner, Kumaun Division, Nainital (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commissioner) affirming the same, and has prayed for the relief for quashing the same.3. Brief facts leading to the controversy involved in the present petition are--(a) That in the night between 12/13-3-1982 while the dacoits raided his ...
Anand Kumar Sharma Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-09-1991
Reported in: [1992]198ITR121(All)
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The sole grievance raised on behalf of the petitioner in this petition is that, after service of the notice under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88 and the petitioner informing the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (assessing authority) that the return filed originally may be treated as a return filed in compliance with the notice under Section 148 of the Act for the said two assessment years, the assessing authority has refused to disclose the reasons for taking action under Section 148 of the Act. In view of the fact that the assessee has stated that the return filed originally by him may be treated as a return filed in compliance with Section 148 of the Act for the said assessment years, we direct the sole opposite party (assessing authority) to disclose the reasons for taking action under Section 148 of the Act for the said assessment years to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of production o...
ElgIn Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-t ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-08-1991
Reported in: [1992]198ITR81(All)
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.1. The petitioner, the Elgin Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur, is questioning the validity of a notice dated March 14, 1980, issued by the respondent (the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment) 'D' Range, Kanpur), under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. The impugned notice is in the prescribed pro forma. Except saying that the Income-tax Officer proposes to reopen the assessment for the year 1976-77 inasmuch as he has reasonable grounds to believe that income assessable to tax has escaped assessment, the notice does not mention or contain any facts. Soon after receiving this notice, the petitioner approached this court by way of this writ petition on April 15, 1980. It was admitted on April 16, 1980, and on the stay petition it was directed that the petitioner should file his return in response to the impugned notice and the Income-tax Officer may also continue the assessment proceedings but shall not sign the assessment order. Counsel for th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »