Skip to content


Allahabad Court June 1991 Judgments Home Cases Allahabad 1991 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.008 seconds)

Jun 29 1991 (HC)

Dev Pal Singh Vs. Vice-chancellor, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1992All163

ORDER1. The petitioner has been dropped for two semesters i.e. I and II semesters 1990/91. The University campus and its farm were declared out of bounds for him. He was placed on conduct probation throughout his stay in the University after his re-registration in 1st semester 1991-92 if his re-registration is allowed. He was barred from seeking any employment in the University and admission for any higher degree programme in the University. This punishment of the petitioner is based on the charge sheet served on him on 30-1-91. He was charged for having indulged in the acts of indiscipline as mentioned in the said charge-sheet. These were as under :--1. Showing disrespect to a teacher.2. Threatening and abusing a University Staff under the influence of liquor.3. Using Motor cycle during late night hours and forcibly entering in the house of a campus resident.4. Showing disrespect and challenging the authority of the Vice-Chancellor and Deans, and5. Attempting to use illegal means to o...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1991 (HC)

Ambika Prasad Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1478

ORDERP.P. Gupta, J.1. This revision has been filed by Ambika Prasad against the order dated 24-4-1991 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, committing the case of the revisionist and other co-accused for trial to the court of Session in Case Crime No. 74 of 1991 under Sections 302/34, 149, 148 and 147, I.P.C.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant-revisionist at length at the stage of admission.3. The only ground pressed before me was that Sri D.D Upadhyay, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, had earlier recorded the statements of prosecution witnesses under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and so, in view of Section 479, Cr.P.C. the Committal of the case to the court of Session by him was wholly illegal.4. Section 479, Cr.P.C. provides that no Judge or Magistrate shall, except with the permission of the Court to which an appeal lies from his Court, try or commit for trial any case to or in which he is a party, of personall...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //