Allahabad Court December 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prem Raj Alias Prem Singh Vs. Iiird Addl. Dist. Judge, and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-05-1991
Reported in: AIR1992All332
ORDER1. This is judgment-debtor's writ petition.2. M/s. Moti Lal Ram Ji Das, opposite party No. 3, filed a suit, against the petitioner for recovery of money, in the court of Judge Small Causes. It was decreed on 7-11-1980 for a sum Rs. 1,111/-. The decree became final.3. Decree-holder filed an execution case No. 14 of 1982. The agricultural land belonging to the petitioner was attached. A date was fixed for auction sale.4. At the time of the auction the decree-holder filed an application on 8-4-1982 for permission to participate in the auction. It was allowed. He was the highest bidder. His bid was accepted. Sale was confirmed on 26-3-1983. Sale certificate was issued in his favour.5. Judgment-debtor filed an objection (paper No. 3/c) under S. 47, Civil P. C. His objections were that the agricultural land could not be attached and sold in execution of decree of Small Causes Court. He also raised an objection that the decree could not be transferred and the transferee court had no juri...
Universal Book Stall Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-05-1991
Reported in: [1993]199ITR687(All)
A.N. Verma, J. 1. At the instance of the assessee, the following questions have been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Kanpur, for our opinion : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that, in the appeal against the reassessment order made under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in the present case, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to consider and decide the question that the relevant proceedings and reassessment were invalid and beyond the scope of Section 147(a) 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the scope of the relevant appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner under Section 246(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, did not permit consideration and decision on the legality of reassessment proceedings taken under Section 147(a) ?' 2. The assessee is a registered firm. Its ...
Dattarey Khanwalkar and anr. Vs. Shanti Devi and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-05-1991
Reported in: I(1992)ACC601; 1992ACJ310
N.N. Mithal and N.L. Ganguli, JJ.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, by the owners of the two vehicles which were involved in the accident in which the husband of the respondent No. 1, Lalmani Misra, was seriously injured, to which he ultimately succumbed. A claim petition was filed by the widow and four children for award of compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,30,000/-. We have gone through the award of the Claims Tribunal and also looked into the record of the case.2. The allegations made by the claimants were that the deceased was travelling in a three-wheeler No. USG 9797 owned by appellant No. 2 which was hit by a bus No. USG 7122 owned by appellant No. 1. On account of the aforesaid accident the deceased Lalmani Misra received serious injuries and remained hospitalised from 15th April, 1977 to 24th May, 1977 on which date he died in the Medical College Hospital at Jhansi. The claimants put up a claim to the extent of Rs. 6,000/- toward...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›