Allahabad Court November 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raunaq Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-06-1985
Reported in: 1987CriLJ445
ORDERN.N. Sharma, J.1. This revision is directed against order dt. 16-7-1981 recorded by Sri P.N. Roy, learned Sessions Judge, Moradabad, who dismissed criminal appeal No. 8 of preferred by revisionist and affirmed his conviction Under Section 411 of Indian Penal Code and sentence of one year's rigorous imprisonment as awarded by Sri B.C. Gautam, Munsif Magistrate, Moradabad in case No. 1656 of 1979 dt. 16-12-1980.2. One gun and two live cartridges were stolen on the night of 18/19, April, 1979 at about 3 a.m. from the house of Govind Singh P. W. 1. The said gun was recovered from the possession of revisionist on 15-5-1979 giving rise to his trial Under Sections 399/402, IPC. On completion of investigation revisionist was sent up by Sri D. S. Yadav P.W. 4.3. Prosecution examined Govind Singh P.W. 1 about the ownership and theft of the gun, while V.S. Singh and Yad Ram P.W. 2 and 3 respectively were examined about the recovery of the gun from the possession of revisionist on 15-5-1979 a...
Dunlop India Limited Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-05-1985
Reported in: [1987]65STC364(All)
Anshuman Singh, J.1. This revision under Section 11(1) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 14th December, 1984, passed by the U. P. Sales Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, relating to the assessment year 1974-75.2. The applicant-revisionist is a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act having its registered office at Mirza Ghalib Road, Dunlop House, Calcutta and a branch office at 3, Shahnajaf Road, Lucknow and is registered under the U. P. as well as under the Central Sales Tax Acts. For the assessment year in question the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) accepted the books of account of the applicant and assessed it on the total taxable turnover of Rs. 8,49,82,955.09. The applicant feeling aggrieved by the said order filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax and by order dated 25th April, 1981, the said appeal was partly allowed. The applicant aggrieved by the aforesaid order preferred a second appeal ...
Sumer Singh Parihar Vs. Kalpna and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1985
Reported in: II(1990)DMC266
N.N. Sharma, J.1. Both these cases are being disposed of by this order as these arise out of the same order of Sri S.C. Mittal, learned Sessions Judge Jhansi dated 3-8-1983 who dismissed Criminal Revision No. 35 of 1983 preferred by Sumer Singh and allowed Criminal Revision No. 41 of 1983 preferred by Smt. Kalpna, wife of Sumer Singh.2. Both these cases arose under following circumstances :Application under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure for maintenance was moved by Smt. Kalpna on 5-8-1981. The Allegations were that she was the second wife of Sumer Singh married at Jhansi in 1979 according to Hindu rites. The first wife of Sumer Singh expired in a fire incident.3. After her marriage with Sumer Singh, she performed her marital obligations and was pregnant. On 3-5-1981 she returned to her house with her brother as her father, who was a railway servant, was going to retire. Her elder sister Smt. Malti was murdered on 28-5-1981 and the entire family was grief stricken. It was on...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›