Skip to content

Allahabad Court January 1984 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 06 1984

Abdul Zabbar Vs. Superintendent of District Jail and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-06-1984

Reported in: 1984CriLJ847

H.N. Seth, J.1. By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioners, namely, Abdul Zabbar (Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 12534 of 1983) Abdul Gaffar, Abdul Rab alias Pappus Abdul Wahab, Ilyas and Aas Mohammad (Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 12737 of 1983) question the validity of their detention in the District Jail, Meerut and pray that the Superintendent, District Jail, Meerut, should be directed to set them at liberty forthwith.2. All the six petitioners are accused in crime case No. 177/83 under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302, I.P.C. pertaining to Police Station Lisari Gate, Meerut. After completing the investigation the police submitted a charge-sheet against them on 5th of August, 1983 and the Chiei Judicial Magistrate has, vide his order dated 1-9-1983 committed their case to the Court of Session. On the same day the Sessions Judge registered the case as S. T. No. 430 of 1983; and the petitioners are at present being detained in the District Jail, Meerut...


Jan 02 1984

The Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Limited Vs. Surendra Mohan Agarw ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-02-1984

Reported in: AIR1984All174

B.D. Agarwal, J.1. This is plaintiff's appeal. 2. The plaintiff is a Co-operative Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912. It runs a Sugar Factory in Bazpur district Nainital. The defendant No. 1 is the sole proprietor of the Firm arrayed as the defendant No. 2. On Sept. 18. 1969 the parties entered into a contract in writing whereby the defendant No. 1 agreed to supply to the plaintiff 1000 Brass Tubes. The price agreed was Rs. 30/- per kilo F.O.R., Bazpur and this was inclusive of sales tax, excise duty, transportation, packing and forwarding charges. Of the goods 50% was to be supplied latest by October 31, 1969 and the rest within Nov. 30, 1969. A sum of Rs. 67,215/- was paid to the defendant No. 1 by the plaintiff by cheque the same day as advance money. The Brass Tubes in question were to be those manufactured by M/s. Kamani Tubes Private Ltd. Bombay. Despite the plaintiff having agreed to take the supply beyond the stipulated period, the defendant No. 1 fai...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial