Allahabad Court December 1977 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhaiya Ji Vs. Jageshwar Dayal Bajpai
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-1977
Reported in: AIR1978All268
ORDERK.C. Agarwal, J.1. This revision is directed against the judgment of the Civil Judge, Etawah, dated 30th Oct. 1973, deciding Issue No. 6 against Bhaiyaji alias Nagendra Prasad Bajpai the applicant.2. Briefly stated, the facts necessary to appreciate the controversy are these. One Smt. Bitto Kuer was the aunt of the plaintiffs. She owned considerable property. Jageshwar Dayal (since deceased), who was impleaded as defendant in the suit, used to manage the same. During the lifetime of Smt. Bitto Kuer, the defendant made negotiations on her behalf for the sale of her properties, which ultimately fructified. On the transfer having been made by Smt. Bitto Kuer, the defendant received a sum of Rs. 11,000/- on her behalf. Smt. Bitto Kuer, however, died on 14-8-1971. During her lifetime she executed a will bequeathing her estate including the amount in question to the plaintiffs. In the suit, the plaintiffs claimed the said amount on the basis of the will.3. The suit was contested by the ...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vindeshwari Trading Corporation
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-1977
Reported in: (1978)7CTR(All)110; [1988]113ITR791(All)
H.N. Seth, J. 1. Having heard counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the following questions of law do arise from out of the appellate order of the Tribunal:'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that two assessments should be made separately for the two periods ; April 1, 1971, to October 31, 1971, and November 1, 1971, to March 31, 1972 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in not treating the assessee-firm as reconstituted within the meaning of the clear provisions contained in Section 187(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?' 2. The learned counsel for the assessee urged that in so far as the aforementioned questions of law are concerned, answer to these questions, on the findings arrived at in the present case, stands concluded by two Full Bench decisions of this court in the cases of Commissioner of Income-tax v. Kunj Behari Shyam Lal : [1977...
Bishambhar Dass Vs. Smt. Anguri and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-1977
Reported in: 1978CriLJ385
ORDERV.N. Varma, J.1. This revision has arisen out of a case Under Section 125 of the Cr.PC2. Smt. Anguri (O.P. no. 1) is the legally wedded wife of the applicant (Bishambhar Dass). They were married some time in the year 1944. After their marriage they lived a normal married life for some years and even a daughter was born out of their wedlock. Things were, however, not destined to be smooth and differences started growing up between them. It is said that the applicant was a man of loose morals and developed illicit intimacy with one Smt. Jagwati. Opposite party No. 1 resented this thing and asked the applicant to mend his manners but he would not listen to her. Instead, his attitude towards her hardened and very often he ill-treated her. He even turned her out from his house. Some well-wishers intervened and a reconciliation took place between them. The applicant promised not to have any connection with Smt. Jagwati and opposite party no. 1 then moved to his house. It is further said...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›