Allahabad Court March 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Lal Singh Vs. the District Judge, Fatehpur and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-05-1975
Reported in: AIR1976All79
M.P. Mehrotra, J. 1. This is the appellant's application praying that the instant election appeal be allowed, the order of the District Judge, Fatehpur dated 29th September. 1973. be set aside and the election petition be directed to have abated. In the alternative, it has been prayed that in case the aforementioned prayed cannot be granted then the name of the respondent No. 2 be struck off and a note be made that he is dead. This application is supported by an affidavit. A counter-aaffiavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent No. 4. Shri Sukhram, opposing the said application. The appellant has filed an affidavit-in-rejoinder in opposition to the aforesaid counter-affidavit and in support of his aforesaid application.2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the application are these: An election took place to elect the Pramukh of Kshetra Samiti, Teliyani. District Fatehpur and the appellant. Ram Lal Singh, was declared to have been elected. There were four contesting candi...
G.C. Ghildayal Vs. District Judge, Allahabad and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-05-1975
Reported in: AIR1975All309
ORDERK.N. Singh, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution directed against the order of the Prescribed Authority passed tinder Section 21 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, directing the petitioner's eviction from the accommodation in question and the order of the IV Additional District Judge, Allahabad, dismissing the petitioner's appeal.2. Sri G.C. Ghildayal, the petitioner, is a practising Advocate of this Court. He is one of the tenants of the premises of building No. 11, Mayo Road, Allahabad, since 1948. There are two other tenants besides the applicant who are occupying the portion of the said building as tenants. Justice Hiralal Kapoor, who is landlord of the premises in question, filed an application under Section 21 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, hereinafter referred to as the Act, against the petitioner as well as the two other tenants, namely, Sri S. Willi...
Chhotey Lal Singh Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P., Lu ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-05-1975
Reported in: AIR1975All393
K.N. Singh, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, dated 21-11-1973 dismissing the petitioner's appeal as barred by time.2. The petitioner made an application for grant of a permanent stage carriage permit on Kuru Tilari via Babatpur crossing route. The Regional Transport Authority Varanasi, rejected the petitioner's application by its order dated 21-0-1973. The order was, however, not communicated to the petitioner as required by Section 57 (71 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The petitioner, however, made an application on 29-9-1973 for obtaining a certified copy of the order of the Regional Transport Authority. The copy was prepared and delivered to the petitioner on 8-10-1973. The petitioner thereupon presented his appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal on 3-11-1973. The Tribunal dismissed the petitioner's appeal on 21-11-1973 on the ground that it was barred by time.3. Section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act lays down...
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central)
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-04-1975
Reported in: [1976]102ITR451(All)
Gulati, J.1. This and the connected references under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, raise a common question relating to the same assessee for assessment years 1954-55, 1955-56 and 1956-57, and hence they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. There were two sugar companies at Rampur known as the Raza Sugar Company Ltd. and Buland Sugar Company Ltd. which were merged with effect from November 1, 1955, by an order of this court in 1957, Consequent upon this merger the name of Buland Sugar Company was changed into Raza Buland Sugar Company. The assessee in the present references is Raza Buland Sugar Company Ltd. but references in fact relate to the assessments of Buland Sugar Company.3. The two sugar companies had formed a partnership firm known as the Agricultural Company. The Agricultural Company suffered a loss. It was assessed as unregistered firm for the assessment years in question. The Buland Sugar Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee'...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›