Allahabad Court April 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramanand and anr. Vs. Smt. Premvati and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-05-1972
Reported in: AIR1973All105
Hari Swarup, J.1. This is plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of possession over a house and for arrears of rent and mesne profits. The trial Court decreed the suit, but on appeal the decree was set aside and the suit was dismissed. It was dismissed as barred by limitation.2. The facts of the case are, that the house originally belonged to Chunni and Naubat, they sold it on 23-8-1927 to Prem Raj and subsequently his sons Piarey Lal and Sri Rama sold it to the plaintiff on 25-8-1958. The present suit was filed in 1958. The case of the plaintiffs was that Chunni and Naubat after the sale had continued to occupy the house as tenants of the vendee Prem Raj and in 1943 Naubat had executed a rent note in respect of the house and subsequently the claim for rent was also decreed by Nyaya Panchayat on the basis of a compromise. The defence on the other hand was that the relationship of landlord and tenant had never existed, the alleged rent note of 1943 was a forged document a...
Kishan Chand Agarwal and ors. Vs. City Magistrate and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-04-1972
Reported in: (1972)IILLJ531All
C.S.P. Singh, J.1. An application under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act was made by respondents Nos. 2 to 51 claiming payment of wages from the petitioners Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. They claimed that their wages falling under the various heads had fallen due and that the petitioners were not paying the same. Subsequent thereto, an application under Section 17A of the Payment of Wages Act was also filed by the employees, and they requested that five items of property said to belong to their employers be attached, on the ground that the employers had illegally closed the factory and had thrown out the employees from employment and that they were trying to transfer, dispose of or remove the assets so as to evade payments.2. The employers filed objections to the aforesaid application for attachment and denied the allegations contained therein. In paragraph 8 of their objection (Annexure 'E' to the petition), it was stated that inasmuch as there was no specification of the actual acts c...
The State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Suraj Bhan Pande Overruled
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-03-1972
Reported in: AIR1972All401
K.B. Srivastava, J.1. This special appeal arises out of the following facts :--Under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 hereinafter referred to as the Act), if the Central Government is of opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to do for maintaining or increasing supplies of any essential commodity or for securing their equitable distribution and availability at fair prices, it may by order, provide for regulating or prohibiting the production, supply and distribution thereof and trade and commerce therein. Under Sub-section (2) of this section without prejudice, to the generality of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) an order made thereunder may provide:(a) .....; (b) .....; (c) .....; (d) for regulating by licences, permits or otherwise the storage, transport, distribution, disposal, acquisition, use or consumption, of any essential commodity; (e) .....; (f) .....; (g) .....; (h) .....; (i) .....; (ii) .....; (i) .....; Under Clause (b) of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›