Allahabad Court September 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mashkurul Hasan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All565
M.H. Beg, J.1. This is a plaintiffs second appeal arising out of a suit for an injunction against the Union of India and the State of Uttar Pradesh to restrain the defendants from deporting the plaintiff-appellant to Pakistan. The suit was filed on 20th of April 1956, on the ground that the plaintiff and his parents having been born in India and having an Indian domicile, the plaintiff was a citizen of India. The plaintiff, in an extremely brief plaint, devoid of necessary particulars, staled that he had gone to Pakistan in 1948 'on a temporary visit in connection with his business activities.' No details were given as to the particular nature of his business activities and the circumstances under which the plaintiff had to go to Pakistan due to the needs of his business. The plaintiff then stated that travel restrictions were suddenly imposed so that it became impossible for the plaintiff to return to India. He alleged that he had asked the defendants lo permit the plaintiff to return...
S. Bhan Singh Vs. Regional Transport Authority and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-02-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All336
ORDERG.D. Sahgal, J.1. The petitioner is one of the 65 persons who hold a stage carriage permit on the route known as the Garhmukhteshwar-Hapur-Pilkhua-Ghaziabad-Delhi route or more shortly Garh-Delhi route described in Annex. 1 as the blue route (it will henceforward be described for the sake of brevity as the blue route). It is an interstatal route Respondent No. 3 also held a stage carriage permit for a route from Ghaziabad to Faridnagar via Pilkhua shown in annexure 1 in lilac. A portion of this route is common with the blue route between Ghaziabad and Pilkhua.On the 1st of February, 1962 respondent No. 8 made an application for the variation of his route. He proposed that he be allowed the route from Ghaziabad to Faridnagar via Pilkhua-Hapur-Bhojpur shown in red in annexure 1. He also prayed that his permit be varied so as to allow him to ply his stage carriage from Ghaziabad to Hapur via Pilkhua, i.e., the route shown in green in annexure 1. Due publication was made of his applic...
Firm Rupram Kailash Nath Vs. Co-operative Union and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All382
S.N. Katju, J.1. This is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of Rupees 2.034-6-9 from the first defendant through the second defendant 2. The plaintiff firm was carrying on commission agency business in cloth at Kanpur. The first defendant the co-operative Union, Mallawah, district Hardoi (hereinafter called the society) had appointed the second defendant Sri Ram Chandra Pandey as their sales agent. It was stated in the written statement filed by the first defendant that the second defendant was employed in the Co-operative Union Mallawah as a salesman 'on salary or commission' The second defendant purchased cloth worth Rupees 1857 15-3 from the plaintiff on credit for the first defendant and further borrowed Rupees 50 from the plaintiff for defraying the octroi duty and transport charges. Admittedly cloth was purchased from the plaintiff and was duly received by the first defendant. It was further admitted that the first defendant had paid the price of the aforesaid...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›