Allahabad Court November 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Gandhi Faiz-e-am Degree College Vs. the University of Agra and anr ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-02-1966
Reported in: AIR1968All188
K.B. Asthana, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner known as the Gandhi Faiz-e Am Degree College, Shahjahanpur, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, questions the validity of the conditions put on it by the university of Agra for permitting and recognising the opening of B. T. and LL.B classes in the College.2. It is claimed that the petitioner is an institution owned, managed and run by the Muslim minority community which is in effective administration and control of it and that the conditions which the Agra University has laid down interfere with its fundamental rights conferred by Article 30 of the Constitution.3. The petitioner according to its Constitution, a copy of which is annexure 'A' to the petition, has the following bodies for carrying on its management and administration:(a) General Council. (b) Governing Body. (c) Managing Committee. 4. The further rules of the Constitution indicate that it is the members of the M...
State of U.P. Vs. Ch. Laiq Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-02-1966
Reported in: AIR1968All170; 1968CriLJ584
S.D. Khare. J.1. This is a Government Appeal directed against an order of acquittal passed by the learned AdditionalSessions Judge. Kanpur on 30th April, 1963.2. Chaudhry Laiq Singh, his wife Sm. Ram Maya, his driver Kishun Chand and his three relations, namely, Gajendrapal Singh, Bimal Kumar and Tej Bahadur, we committed to the Court of Session, Kanpur, to stand their trial for having committed offences punishable under Sections 365/364 read with Section 149 I.P.C. All of them except Gajendrapal Singh (respondent) were further charged under Sections 147, 357/149 and 325/149 I.P.C. There was also an alternative charge against them for offences punishable under the aforesaid sections read with Section 34 I.P.C. All the respondents except Gajendrapal Singh were further charged under Section 342/34 I.P.C. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has acquitted all the respondents of all the offences with which they were charged.3. The person in respect of whom all the offences mentioned in th...
Hiralal Jagannath Prasad Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P., Lucknow
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1968All242; [1967]66ITR293(All)
Manchanda, J. 1. This is a case stated under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, (hereinafter referredto as the Act). The question referred is:'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the firm was entitled to renewal of registration under Section 26A for the assessment year 1959-60?'2. The material facts are these: The assessee Messrs. Hiralal Jagannath Prasad of Banaras, a Hindu undivided family concern, was carrying on business at Banaras, inter alia, in Kirana and money lending. A partial partition qua the aforesaid business was effected on the 17th of July 1948 and, on the following day namely, 18th July, 1948. the members of the erstwhile Hindu undivided family formed themselves into a partnership for the purpose of carrying on the aforesaid business. An instrument of partnership was duly drawn up on 31st July, 1948 which was made operative from 18th July, 1948. According to the deed of partnership, which was in Hindi and an English translation whe...
Kanhai Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All561
Tripathi, J.1. Appellant Kanhai has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad, of offences under Sections 457 & 302 I. P. C. and has been sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment under the first count and to suffer death on thecharge of murder. He has come up in appeal against his conviction and sentences and the learned Sessions Judge has made the usual reference for the confirmation of the sentence of death inflicted on the appellant.2. The accusation against the appellant was that during the night intervening 3rd and 4th of September. 1965, at about 2 A.M. in order to commit theft he committed house breaking of Pyare Bhurji's house in village Ghamaich Mau, police station Kannauj, district Farrukhabad and near the aforesaid house committed murders of Phool Chand and Sri Krishna by striking at them repeatedly with a Kanta The learned Sessions Judge was of opinion that the case of the prosecution relating to the murder of Phool Chandra has not been established a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›