Allahabad Court January 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Vs. Addl. Commr. Allahabad Division and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-05-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All435
ORDERD.D. Seth, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution arises out of proceedings under the U. P Municipalities Act (hereinafter called the Act) The facts of the case, as contained in the petition, are that the petitioner is a limited company at Kanpur and carries on the business of manufacture and sale of cloth within the limits of Kanpur Corporation. At the commencement of quinquennial assessment for the years 1953 to 1958 the then Municipal Board Kanpur, assessed the annual value of the petitioner's premises at Rs. 1,23,500. It seems the petitioner Company's premises were, later on, extended and hence the Municipal Board increased the annual value of the premises to Rs. 1,42,583 towards the close of the assessment for the years 1963 to 1968. At the commencement of the quinquennial assessment for the years 1958 to 1963 the Municipal Board revised the assessment of annual value of petitioner's premises and fixed the same at Rupees 2,86,140. Notice regarding the propos...
Puttaulu and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-05-1966
Reported in: 1966CriLJ1233
ORDERH.C.P. Tripathi, J.1. This revision is directed against an order of a Special Magistrate, First Class, Kanpur, committing the applicants under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. to stand their trial before the Court of sessions. According to the allegations made in the complaint, complainant Puttan Lal was shot at by a country made pistol by one of the applicants at the behest of the other applicants and had received therein gun shot injuries. A number of witnesses were produced in support of the allegations made in the complaint. Dr. Mathrani had stated that the complainant was admitted in the hospital as an indoor patient on the 6th January 1963, and was discharged on 13th of February 1963, and that on the 9th of January 1963, he was operated and three gun shots were taken out of his thigh. After examining two witnesses in defence the trial Magistrate was satisfied that there was a prima facie case against the applicants and, accordingly he committed them to the Cour...
Ram Kumar Rajendra Swaroop Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-04-1966
Reported in: [1967]19STC241(All)
M.C. Desai, C.J.1. This is a case referred by the Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax, U.P., under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, at the assessee's instance, inviting this Court to answer the following two questions :(1) Whether the word 'successive' used in Section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act includes the first dealer ?(2) Whether in view of Sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, Section 7 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, and the definition of 'sugar' as given in the Central Excises Act, the U.P. Government could impose tax on khandsari sugar for the periods (1) 1st April, 1958 to 30th September, 1958 and (2) 1st October, 1958 to 28th February, 1959 ?2. The associated references except Sales Tax Reference No. 9 of 1964 are similar to this and the same questions have been referred. In Sales Tax Reference No, 9 of 1964 the facts are similar but the question referred is :-Whether in view of Section 7 taxation of sugar as defined by Secti...
M.N. Bhatia Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-04-1966
Reported in: 1968CriLJ555
M.H. Beg, J.1. The appellant was tried and convicted by an Additional Sessions' Judge of Saharanpur on charges framed as follows:Firstly: That, you, on or about the 16th day of September, 1959 in Delhi, abetted the commission of the offence of cheating, by sending accused H.N. Chowdhry to Saharanpur to realise money from the public for the purpose of Kashmir Belief Fund in the name of Central Belief and Social Welfare Committee Delhi by falsely representing himself to be the Vice President of the said Committee and the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India as the Chief Patron of the said Committee, and in consequence of your abetment, accused H.N. Chowdhry cheated and collected Rs. 2/2/ and 1/- from Bagohi, Harnam Singh and Dr. Mohan lal respectively and that you thereby committed an offence punishable under Sections 169 and 420, Penal Code and within the cognizance of the Court of Sessions.Secondly: That, you, on the same date time and place, abetted the commission of the offence of using f...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›