Allahabad Court July 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganesh Dutt Bajpai Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-19-1965
Reported in: AIR1967All446
R.S. Pathak, J.1. The petitioner prays for the quashing of an order of the State Government suspending the execution of a resolution of the Nagar Mahapalika, Kanpur, and an order of the Deputy Mukhya Nagar Adhikari made pursuant to it.2. With a view to implementing certain development schemes, the Nagar Mahapalika on July 18 1962 decided to allot a number of plots to Transport Agencies and Luggage Carriers, and invited applications for allotment of these plots. The Executive Committee of the Mahapalika constituted a Sub-committee to process the applications and finalise the allotments. Apart from this, an allotment of flats, housesand shops was also made by the ExecutiveCommittee.3. On July 21, 1964 the Mahapalika taking cognizance of complaints in respect of the allotments made by the Executive Committeeand its Sub-committee constituted two SpecialCommittees to examine those alloments and to submit its report to the Mahapalika. It also directed that the registration of transfer deeds ...
Mahabir Singh Vs. Anant Ram and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-13-1965
Reported in: AIR1966All214
S.S. Dhavan, J.1. This is a tenant's second appeal from the concurrent decisions of the Courts below decreeing the landlord's suit for his ejectment from a house. The plaintiff respondent Anant Ram is the owner of a house in Muzaffarnagar of which the defendant-appellant Mahabir Singh is the tenant. The plaintiff alleged that the appellant fell into arrears of rent for four months which he did not pay in spite of service of a notice of demand. He also alleged that the plaintiff had sub-let a portion of the house to two sub-tenants without his consent. The defendant resisted the suit and denied both allegations. He alleged that on receipt of the notice of demand he remitted the rent due by money order but the plaintiff refused to accept it and the remittance was returned by the post office with the indorsement that it had been refused. As regards the charge of subletting he admitted that the two persons mentioned in the plaint had stayed with him for sometime, but alleged that they were...
Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-13-1965
Reported in: AIR1967All330; (1967)IILLJ763All
ORDERSatish Chandra, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. It prays for an order in the nature of certiorari to quash the notifications dated 28th January 1959 and 24th August 1969 made under Section 3. U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. 1947.2. The petitioner is a company which carries on the business of manufacture and sale of sugar by its vacuum pan sugar factory situate in Iqbalpur, district Saharanpur, By the impugned orders the petitioner company has been directed to pay a sum of Rupees 1,09,000/- as bonus to its workmen for the crushing season 1957-58.3. The question of payment of bonus to workmen of vacuum pan sugar factories had been agitating the management of various sugar factories in the State of Uttar Pradesh, their workmen and the State Government. For several years prior to 1957-68 the question of bonus was referred for consideration to State Tripartite Conference (Sugar) This Conference consisted of representatives of the management of various suga...
C.P. Vedra Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-07-1965
Reported in: 1966CriLJ825
ORDERG. Kumar, J.1. This is a revision against the conviction of the applicant of an offence under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code. He was sentenced by the Magistrate to undergo six months' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, his conviction and sentence were maintained by the Additional Sessions Judge.2. In support of his transfer application, the applicant had filed his affidavit saying that on 4.11.1961 Shri Brijanandan Lal, retired District and Sessions Judge had threatened him that he should pay the decretal amount and vacate the house in question, otherwise by exercising his influence with the court, he would get the applicant sent to jail. The learned District Judge instituted an enquiry under Section 476, Cri. P.C. and was prima facie satisfied that the applicant had sworn a false affidavit inasmuch as Shri Brijnandan Lal was not at Moradabad on 4.11.1961 but was at Allahabad on that date; as such he could not have altered the words attributed to him. The District Judge accor...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›