Allahabad Court February 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Raja Ram Lal
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1965
Reported in: AIR1966All159; (1966)IILLJ365All
ORDERD.S. Mathur, J. 1. This is a revision under Section 115, C. P. C. by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, U. P. Lucknow, defendants, against the order, dated 3-12-1962 of the Civil Judge of Varanasi, allowing the appeal of Raja Ram Lal, plaintiff, and thereby holding that me present suit was cognizable by the Courts at Varanasi.2. The plaintiff was employed as an Overseer in the Irrigation Department of the State of Uttar Pradesh. He was first of all appointed to this post on October 18, 1945, but his services were terminated on October 21, 1950. He was re-employed on 12-10-1951, and his services were again terminated with effect from 5-7-1958. The plaintiff is a resident of Varanasi, and during his two terms of service was not employed there. The plaintiff filed the present suit for the recovery of arrears of salary and the arrears of travelling allowances and also for the refund of the security of Rs. 500 furnished by him.3. Prior to the inst...
Nagar Swasth Adhikari, Municipal Corporation Vs. Raghunath Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1965
Reported in: AIR1966All231; 1966CriLJ501
H.C.P. Tripathi, J.1. This is an appeal by leave under Section 417 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against an order of acquittal recorded by a Magistrate, First Class, Agra, in a case under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (Act No. 37 of 1954).2. On 30th of July, 1960, at about 7 a.m. respondent Raghunath Singh was found carrying cow's milk in a can for sale in Mohalla Rajendra Nagar of the Agra City. Sri V. N. Singh. Food Inspector of the Municipal Corporation obtained sample of milk on payment of its demanded price, divided the same in three parts, sealed and labelled each part in the presence of the respondent in accordance with the rules and sent one of them to the Public Analyst for his report. Again on 29-12-1960 the respondent was round carrying cow's milk for sale in the same locality and a sample was obtained by the aforesaid Food Inspector on payment of its price in accordance with the Rules a part of which was sent to the Public Analyst for repor...
Keshav Datta Misra Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-1965
Reported in: AIR1967All276
ORDER1. The applicant was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Allahabad, on 31-8-1955 in four sessions trials Nos. 51, 51/1, 51/2, 51/3 of 1954. The sentences were made consecutive with the result that the total period of substantive sentences in the four cases came to 12 years, apart from a total fine of Rs. 13,000 and in default, two years rigorous imprisonment in each case, that is, eight years in all On appeals by him, James, J. by his judgment and order dated 2-12-19,57, while confirming the conviction of the applicant, reduced the sentences considerably. The substantive sentences of imprisonment were made concurrent with the result that they came to a total period of five years only Likewise, the sentences of fine were also reduced and aggregated Rs. 8,000. In default of payment of fine the applicant was ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months in each case, that is, two years in all. 2. While serving out his aforesaid sentences of imprisonment the applicant...
Mahendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Federal Chemical Works Ltd. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-03-1965
Reported in: [1965]35CompCas651(All)
Satish Chandra, J. 1. This is an application under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the rectification of the share register of the Federal Chemical Works, Ghaziabad (hereinafter called the company). 2. The company was incorporated as a private limited company in 1936. In December, 1944, it was converted into a public limited company. The registered office of the company is at Ghaziabad. 3. Sri Mahendra Kumar Jain, the petitioner, alleges that he is the holder of four hundred A class shares of rupees one hundred each and 7,450 B class shares of rupees ten each in the company since 3oth December, 1948. The petitioner urges that he repeatedly requested Sri Mitter Sain Jain,who is the works manager of the company, to allow him to inspect the share register as he suspected that some interpolation had been made therein. The inspection was not granted. Ultimately the petitioner came to know in December, 1963, from the office of the Registrar of Companies at Kanpur that in the annua...
Zila Parishad (District Board) Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-02-1965
Reported in: AIR1965All590
Desai, C.J. 1. This application in which arises the question, whether a suit brought by contractor against a District Board for recovery of money due under the contract for the work done by him is governed by the provisions of Section 192 of the District Boards Act. has been referred to this Bench in order to resolve the supposed conflict among District Board, Allahabad v. Behari Lal, : AIR1936All18 , Dargahi Lal v. Cawnpore Municipal Board : AIR1952All382 and Lucknow Nagar Mahapalikav- Sardar KarmajeetSingh, 1962 All L J. 165 : AIR 1982 All 174 (FB).2. The facts which are not in dispute are asfollows. A predecessor of the opposite parties enteredinto a contract on 3-9-1952 with the District Board of Budaun, now represented by the applicant Antraim Zila Parishad, for repairs of a road. The relevantterms of the contract were as follows:--The work should be completed by 30-11-1952 to the entire satisfaction of the officer granting completion certificate. On completion of the work the con...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›