Allahabad Court March 1960 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mathura Datt Bhatt Vs. Prem Ballabh Khulba
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-03-1960
Reported in: AIR1961All19
R.N. Gurtu, J. 1. This is an appeal by the judgment debtor.2. An application for execution of the decree by arrest and detention, in the civil prison, of the judgment debtor appellant was made by the decree-holder respondent. The decree was for a little over Rs. 20,000/-. It was passed in a suit for accounts of a dissolved partnership which had existed between the parties to the decree. The decree-holder invoked Section 51 C.P.C. and alleged that the decree was for a sum for which the judgment debtor was bound, in a fiduciary capacity, to account and that, therefore, he could be detained in the civil prison under Sub-clause (c) of the proviso to that section.3. The court below directed a warrant of arrest to be issued against the judgment debtor as prayed for by the decreeholder. It held that the finding of the court which had passed the decree was that more money was due from the judgment debtor, the accounting partner, than the latter was prepared to admit and that even after the dat...
The State of U.P. Vs. Jaipuria Brothers
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-03-1960
Reported in: [1961]12STC248(All)
R. Dayal, J. 1. This is a special appeal against the order of a learned Judge allowing the respondent's petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and issuing a writ of mandamus to the Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur, and the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh, not to proceed to assess the respondent to sales tax in respect of its turnover for the year 1948-49 under Section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.2. The respondent, Messrs Jaipuria Brothers Limited, stated in its writ petition that it was the sole selling agent of the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co., Ltd., Kanpur, the manufacturer, with effect from 5th of October, 1946; that it sold cloth and yarn for and on behalf of the said manufacturer ; that it held a licence under Section 6 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the Act); and that considering itself to be an agent and not a dealer within the definition of that term in Clause (c) of Section 2 of the Act did not file any return for the assessment year 1948-...
Chotkan Vs. State and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1960
Reported in: AIR1960All606; 1960CriLJ1285
Desai, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave under Section 417(3) Cr. P. C., by a complainant from a judgment of an Additional Sessions Judge, Gorakh-pur, dismissing, on appeal, his complaint against the respondents for the offence of Section 500, I. P. C., and acquitting them. The material facts are as follows:Najmun Nisa, wife of Budhu respondent, obtained a decree for divorce from a Civil Court and Budhu preferred an appeal. During the pendency of the appeal she lived with her parents in Gorakh-pur. Chotkan appellant knew her parents and used to help them by lending money. On 8-4-1958 Budhu respondent filed a complaint under Section 498, I. P. C., against Chotkan and others during the pendency of his appeal against the divorce decree. In the complaint he alleged that Najmun Nisa was enticed away by the appellant under her parent's and brother's abetment and was detaining her in order to commit adultery with her.An inquiry under Section 202, Cr. P. C., was held by a first class Mag...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›