Allahabad Court April 1958 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Mohammad Sattar (Bidi Factory)
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-02-1958
Reported in: AIR1959All404; 1959CriLJ793
D.N. Roy, J.1. These two appeals by the State arise out of more or less the same facts and consequently we propose to dispose of both of them by this common judgment.2. The facts which have given rise to these two appeals lie within a very narrow compass and they may be stated as follows :On 10-4-1954, Mr. P. C. Joshi, Inspector of Factories, paid a visit to certain premises held by Mohammad Sattar a resident of Ganeshganj within police circle Kotwali in District Mirzapur and discovered that 140 persons were preparing Bidis in those premises. They were not using any power or machinery for the preparation of bidis as was borne out by Mohammed Ibrahim, a witness produced on behalf of the prosecution. Those persons used to take the leaves to their homes and prepare them in the form of containers which they filled up with tobacco on the respondent's premises for which they were paid at the rate of Rs. 1/9/- per thousand.3. The State contended at the trial that this was a 'Factory' and the ...
Son Pal Gupta Vs. the University of Agra and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-01-1958
Reported in: AIR1958All792
ORDERJ.K. Tandon, J. 1. The petitioner was a student of Agra University and passed his B, A. Part I examination from the University in the year 1953-54 from Agra College Agra. Ho pursued his studies in B. A. Part II in 1956-57 and also appeared in April 1957 for the final examination. He appeared at all the papers intended for the examination but his result was withheld and in July, 1957 he was informed by the University that his examination had been cancelled and he had also been debarred from appearing at the examination of the University for the year 1958 as he used unfair means in the examination held in 1957.The facts leading to the cancellation of his examination as well as to his disqualification for appearing in the examination in 1958 were that during the examination of 1957 the invigilator on duty at the examination centre where the petitioner had been allotted his seat found from his possession a certain paper from which he was found to be copying. This chit was taken posses...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›