Allahabad Court September 1956 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jwala Prasad Vs. Jwala Bank Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-06-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All143
Agarwala, J.1. This is a special appeal against the judgment of the learned Company Judge dismissing in part the appeal preferred by the appellant Jwala Prasad against the rejection of his claim by the Official Liquidators.2. The Jwala Bank was originally a private bank. It was converted into a limited concern in the year 1938. At the time of conversion an agreement was entered into between the Jwala Bank Limited and Sri Jwala Prasad appellant whereby it was agreed that Jwala Prasad shall be the C airman of the Board of Directors of the Jwala Bank Limited, for twenty years certain with a salary of Rs. 2000/- per month, a free furnished house and certain travelling allowances.The Bank continued to function for about 10 years when on the 12th April, 1948, it stopped its business on receipt of a direction from the Go, ern-ment to do so, and on the 1st August, 1949, an application for winding up was made. The Bank was wound up by an order of the 17th February, 1950, and official liquidator...
Sm. Vidya Devi Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-05-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All20; 1957CriLJ16
H.S. Chaturvedi, J. 1. This revision has been filed by one Sm. Vidya Devi, who is the widow of one Jai Narain, A criminal case under Section 408, Penal Code was launched against Jai Narain and he was convicted and sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment and to a fine of Rs. 1,000/- by a Magistrate, first class. Jai Narain filed an appeal before the Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur which came up for hearing on 16-3-1953.It appears that during the pendency of the appeal the appellant Jai Narain died. The fact that Jai Narain was dead on 16-3-1953, was brought to the notice of the learned sessions Judge but the Court proceeded with the appeal ex parte and dismissed it. It is against this order that the petitioner has come up in revision.2. When this revision came up for hearing before a learned Judge of this Court, learned counsel for the applicant raised two contentions. The first was that the learned Sessions Judge should have passed an order of abatement of the whole appeal and that...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›