Allahabad Court November 1956 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hindustan Vanaspati Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Board Ghaziab ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-12-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All155
ORDERMehrotra, J.1. The petitioner is a joint stock company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913. Its registered office is situate at Scindia House, Ballard Estate, Bombay, and one of the branch offices is situate at Lever House, Ajmeri Gate, New Delhi. The petitioner has factories at various places in India, including one at the Grand Trunk Road, Ghaziabrd, Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner manufactures Vanaspati in the factory and commodities like vegetable oils are supplied to the factory.Some consignments of soaps manufactured by M/s Lever Brothers (India) Limited, the associate of the petitioner, are also received at this factory for storage. The goods are brought into the factory by railway wagons over an Assisted Railway Siding which branches off the main railway line and then passing through the factory boundary ends inside the premises of the factory.The factory is situate within the limits of the Ghaziabad Municipality. Subsequent to the agreement between the Governm...
Madan Mohan Lal Vs. Om Prakash and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-12-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All384
ORDERMehrotra, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a member of the Municipal Board, Chandausi, for a writ of quo-warranto against the opposite party Sri Om Prakash to show the authority by which he is holding the office of the member of the Municipal Board. 2. The Municipal Board Chandausi consists of 25 members including the President who is the ex-officio member of the Board. The General Elections took place on the 26th of October 1953 to elect the President and the members of the Board and the petitioner and the opposite party Om Prakash were elected members and one Sri Bhagwati Prasad was elected President of the Board. Formerly the opposite party Om Prakash was an insurance employee and on the commencement of the Life Insurance Corporation Act XXXI of 1956, i.e., on the 1st of September 1956, he became an employee of the Central Government through the Life Insurance Corporation of India. Since the 1st of September 1958 he is working a...
Virendra Singh Vs. Returning Officer, Gaon Panchayat Elections and ors ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-09-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All213
ORDERMehrotra, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that a writ of mandamus toe issued directing the opposite parties not to hold any fresh poll for the election of Pradhan, of Gaon Sabha Ganaura, district Mirzapur. 2. The facts which are alleged in the affidavit and which have been substantially admitted by the opposite party No. 3 are that the Gaon Sabha Ganaura consists of Sheopura, Sihauli, Ramgarhwa and Ganaura. The elections for the various offices of the Gaon Sabha were held on the 29th of December, 1955. The petitioner and the opposite party No. 3 Bhaggar Prasad were the two duly nominated contestants for the election of the Pradhan of the Gaon Sabha. The polling-took place at four different polling booths and different Polling Officers were appointed. The Parties' agents were present at the various polling booths and on the 31st of December, 1955, the polling returns were verified by the Returning Officer and the petitioner was duly declar...
Raj NaraIn Agarwal Vs. Administrator, Improvement Trust, Agra
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-09-1956
Reported in: AIR1958All351
ORDERG. Mehrotra, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that a writ of certiorari be issued quashing the notices dated 15-9-1955 and 23-12-1955 issued by the opposite party, the Administrator, Improvement Trust, Agra. It is further prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued to the opposite party requiring him to forebear from giving effect to the notices and the order dated 15-9-1955 and 23-12-1955. 2. The facts briefly which are alleged in the affidavit are that the petitioner is the proprietor of a flour mill known as Agra Roller Flour Mill which is situate in Phatak Suraj Brian, Agra, on land, and premises bearing the present municipal number 1162. The land was acquired by the petitioner under various sale deeds on different dates and it is not necessary to go into details as regards the question of title of the petitioner to the land. On 16-9-1955 the petitioner, it is alleged, received the notice dated 15-9-1955 from Sri M. A. Quraishi, Administr...
L. Maheshwari Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-09-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All282
ORDERV.D. Bhargava, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by one Maheshwari prasad who is the owner of a bus No. U. S. K. 330 which plies between Phariah and Mainpuri. As circumstances and property tax, it is alleged, he has to pay Rs. 31/4/-to the Town Area Committee Phariah and the same amount in the Town Area Committee, Jasrana and a sum of Rs. 407- to the Municipal Board, Mainpuri. In addition to this a sum of Rs. 168/4/- quarterly is paid by him as tax under the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioner during his journey passes through Mustafabad, where there is a stand for motor buses. The petitioner drops passengers at and takes passengers from that place. The road, according to the petitioner, belongs to the District Board og Mainpuri on which this business is carried on. The Gaon Bamaj of Mustafabad imposed a tax of Rs. 250/- on the petitioner as income tax on the above with respect to the year 1951-52 and another sum of Rs. 2507- for the year 1952-53 a...
Sukhbir Singh Vs. Mohammad Saeed and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-09-1956
Reported in: (1957)ILLJ488All
M.L. Chaturvedi, J.1. This is an appeal against an order of a learned Judge of this Court allowing a writ petition.2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the appellant was given a temporary appointment as a clerk to fill a leave vacancy in the office of the District Board of Saharanpur. Then two permanent vacancies in the posts of clerks occurred, and the district board appointed the first respondent and one Ram Lai to the posts. The appellant, who had been temporarily appointed to one of these posts, went in appeal against this order to the Commissioner, and the Commissioner, Meerut Division, allowed his appeal holding that the appellant had a better claim to the appointment than the first respondent. This order was passed on 5 July 1955. The first respondent then filed a writ petition in this Court mainly on the ground that no appeal lay to the Commissioner against the order of the district board appointing the first respondent to the permanent post. Mr. Justice Mehrotra was of ...
Amba Prasad Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-09-1956
Reported in: 1957CriLJ272
ORDERAsthana, J.1. These are two applications under Section 526, Cr.P.C. by one Amba Prasad for transfer of two cases pending against him under Sections 107/117, Cr.P.C. in the Court of Sri A. B. Mathur, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Koel, District Aligarh.2. The applications have been made on the grounds that during the pendency of these cases the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate suspenued arms licence of the applicant; that thereafter a writ petition was moved against the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate against his order suspending the licence and that on account of this fact the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate was displeased with the applicant and made certain remarks during the pendency of the cases on account of which the applicant apprehends that he is not likely to get a fair trial in his Court.It is alleged in the affidavit on behalf of the applicant that the attitude of the learned Magistrate was very harsh towards the applicant; that the applicant was asked by the learned M...
Abdul Raheem Vs. Raghunath Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-08-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All263
Mootham, C. J. 1. This is an appeal from a Judgment of the learned Additional Civil Judge of Ballia dismissing an appeal from a judgment of the Munsif of Rasra, District Ballia.2. On the 21st January, 1921, the predeces-sors-in-title of the respondent executed in favour of the appellant a lease in perpetuity of a price of land, the consideration therefor being the payment of a premuim of Rs. 969 and an annual rent of Rs. 3-1-8. The lease was thereafter registered under the Indian Registration Act. It is common ground that the appellant was put into actual possession of the demised property, and that some eighteen months or two years later he sublet the land to one Ram Dhari, the son of Chirkut deceased.After some earlier litigation, which it is not at present necessary to refer, the appellant in March, 1941, filed a suit under Section 59 of the U. P. Tenancy Act against his lessor and Ram Dhari for a declaration that he was a tenant of the former. On the 26th September, 1941, the suit ...
Anant Bahadur Singh Vs. Ashtbhuja Bux Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-06-1956
Reported in: AIR1960All227
V. Bhargava, J.1. This is a defendant-appellant's appeal arising out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for recovery of possession of certain property against the defendants.2. The findings of fact given by the lower court show that the plaintiff-respondent was the transferee of the rights in the property in suit from Srimati Dhiraj Kunwar daughter of Ram Bux Singh who was the last male owner of the property. Srimati Dhiraj Kunwar died and the defendants took possession of the property without coming to court It has also been found that the defendants are the reversioners of Ram Bux Singh so that, on the death of Srimati Dhiraj Kunwar and on their repudiation of the transfer made by her in favour of the plaintiff-respondent, they were the owners of this property.The trial court dismissed the suit holding that the plaintiff respondent was not entitled to take back possession from the defendants who had dispossessed him. The lower appellate court held that the plaintiff was en...
Prem NaraIn Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-05-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All177; 1957CriLJ337
Mukerji, J.1. These are two connected appeals, one by Prem alias Prem Narain, and the other by Nanhey, who were both tried by the learned Sessions Judge of Shahjahanpur at one trial held in May, 1956. Prem was convicted under Section 302 of the I. P. C. for having murdered one Lallan by shooting him with a pistol at about 10-30 p.m. on the 31st of October, 1955, in Mohalla Chaukasi in the city of Shahjahanpur, and sentenced to death for that offence.Nanhey was charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C., for having partaken in the common intention of Prem to murder Lallan. The learned Sessions Judge held Nanhey guilty alternatively under Section 302/114 I. P. C., and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. Prem gave out his age as 15 or 16 years, but the learned Sessions Judge thought he was 20 years of age. We ourselves had him before us and we were of the opinion that Prem was nearer 17 than 20 years of age.Nanhey gave his age as 17 years but the learned Sessions Judge th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »