Allahabad Court September 1954 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Bhugawan and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-01-1954
Reported in: AIR1955All78; 1955CriLJ252
Beg, J.1. This is a reference by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge of Fyzabad under Section 307, Criminal P. C. Two young boys, namely, Bujhawan and Bhaggal were prosecuted under Section 366, Penal Code. They were sent up for trial. The trial was conducted with the aid of a jury. At the end of the trial the jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty. The trial Judge, however, disagreed with the said verdict and has made this reference to the High Court under the aforesaid section Bujhawan and Bhaggal are alleged to have kidnapped a minor girl named Sushila on the night of 12-6-1951.2. The prosecution case in respect of the occurrence is that Sushila daughter of Rajman Das, was living with her father on the date of the incident. The father used to maintain her and look after her. Bujhawan and Bhaggal lived at a distance of about 100 paces from her house. Bujhawan is a Bari by caste, and Bhaggal is a Bhar. The girl was a Brahman by caste. The two boys used to come to the house of the...
Sri Bhola Prasad Vs. Srimati Jagpala and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-01-1954
Reported in: AIR1955All384
ORDERRandhir Singh, J.1. This is an application in revision against an order passed by the Munsif, South Lucknow, refusing to stay a suit on an application of the applicant under Section 10, Civil P. C.2. It appears that the opposite party filed a suit for recovery of rent at a certain rate. The suit was contested on the ground that the rate of rent claimed by the plaintiffs was not the agreed rent. The contention of the defendant was repelled and the suit was decreed. The defendant-applicant then went in revision and that revision is pending before this Court.In the meantime another suit for the recovery of rent for subsequent years for ejectment of the defendant-applicant was instituted. The defendant-applicant then made an application for the stay of this later suit under Section 10, Civil P. C., but the application was rejected by the learned Munsif on the ground that Section 10 of the Code had no application to the facts of the case. He has now come up in revision,3. Reliance has ...
Sm. Chandrawati Vs. L. Suraj Narain
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-01-1954
Reported in: AIR1955All387
Malik. C.J.1. This appeal was filed on behalf of the plaintiff on 7-11-1946, against an order passed by the learned Civil Judge of Moradabad directing the return of the plaint for presentation to the proper Court on the ground that the Court of the learned Civil Judge of Moradabad had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit.2. The plaintiff, Chandrawati, was married to Lala Suraj Narain in the year 1927 in Moradabad. She lived with her husband for a period of ten years and was thereafter turned out by her husband, who, it is alleged, had started illtreating her and had become a man of bad character. She started living with her mother-in-law but the mother-in-law died in 1943. The defendant, the husband of the plaintiff, had by then shifted to Delhi and the plaintiff went to Delhi to live with him but she was again turned out and she came back to Moradabad. In October, 1944, the defendant remarried.The plaintiff filed the suit, out of which this appeal has arisen, in the year 1946 claimin...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›