Allahabad Court August 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohammad Abdul Rahman Khan Vs. the Govt. of the State of Uttar Pradesh ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-03-1953
Reported in: AIR1954All4
Kidwai, J. 1. This is an application under Article 228 of the Constitution, though the nature of the writ claimed is not mentioned. The petitioner, who was a considerable landholder and a man of influence before the abolition of zamin-dari, claimed that in reward for loyal services, --he had been allowed two remissions of revenue, one for Rs. 150/- & the other for Rs. 757- granted to him in 1922 and 1923 and these remissions be allowed up to 1950, when the Government stopp- ed them. He further claimed that he was entitled to continue to enjoy these remissions and any demand by the Government for refund of either of them was illegal and infringed the petitioner's fundamental rights. He, therefore, prayed for a direction or a writ to the Government prohibiting them from 'interfering in any manner in the enjoyment of the two life grants in the nature of remissions of Rs. 150/- and Rs. 75/- in the land revenue of the petitioner' and from realising a sum of Rs. 4,200/- which was the amount ...
Municipal Board of Kanpur Vs. Dominion of India, as Owner of East Indi ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-03-1953
Reported in: AIR1954All56
Malik, C.J.1. This is an appeal filed on behalf of the Municipal Board of Kanpur in a suit filed by the Dominion of India as the owner of the East Indian Railway through the General Manager, East Indian Railway, for the following relief:'The plaintiff claims that the defendant be restrained by injunction from cutting off water supply from all or any of the holdings of the plaintiff East Indian Railway Administration mentioned in para. 2 of the plaint.'The learned Civil Judge of Kanpur decreed the plaintiff's suit and it is against the order of the learned Civil Judge that this appeal was filed by the Municipal Board of Kanpur. The Municipal Board appears to have taken up a hopeless position as the facts given below will show:2. The Municipal Board of Kanpur revised the house tax and water-rate of the buildings within its jurisdiction and enhanced the rate with the result that it demanded from the East Indian Railway Administration house tax and water-rate at the rate of Rs. 19,860/- pe...
Jodha Ram Vs. State Through Bishun Dutt
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-03-1953
Reported in: AIR1954All67
ORDERAgarwala, J.1. This is an application in revision by Jodha Ram Gadaria, a resident of Ahata Agha Turab Khan, Husainganj, Lucknow.2. The applicant was convicted by a Magistrate under Section 448, I. P. C. and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 60/- only. His appeal before the Sessions Judge was dismissed. The facts which led to his prosecution and conviction may be briefly stated as follows :On 30-10-1950, the applicant purchased a house situate in Ahata Agha Turab Khan Husainganj, Lucknow, from one Jagdamba Prasad its previous owner. The house was then occupied by Bishun Dutt, complainant as a tenant. The applicant could not, therefore, enter into actual possession of the house. On 30-11-1950, Bishun Dutt who is employed as a driver in the Transport Section of the U. P. Co-operative Department and Marketing Federation left Lucknow for Benaras with his family after locking the house. The rent for the month of November is alleged to have been sent by him to Jodha Ram on 19-12-1950. It is al...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›