Allahabad Court October 1935 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Das and anr. Vs. Sri Thakurji and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-03-1935
Reported in: AIR1936All422
Iqbal Ahmad, J.1. By the suit giving rise to the present appeal the plaintiff-appellants assailed the validity of a compromise entered into by their maternal grandmother Bindeshri Bahu in the year 1896 and the validity of a decree passed in a suit brought by their mother Sohan Bibi in the year 1906 for a declaration that the compromise was not binding on her. The following pedigree will explain the relationship of the parties:HARISH CHANDRA (d. 16-8-1856) = Manki Bahu (d. 1-6-1893)|---------------------------------------------------| | |Hiran Bibi= Mukandi Bibi= Punno Bibi, defendant 2 (Adopted in 1860Jagannath Das Raghunath Das = Mannu Lal. Parshottam Das| | d. December 1888)Krishna Das Baijnath Das = Bindeshri Bahualias Chuttu Lal defendant 3. (d. 27-8-1916).defendant 4. ||--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| |Mohan Bibi, defendant 5 Sohan Bibi, defendant 6= Baldeo Das (d) = Mukandi Lal|----------------------------------------| |Gopal Da...
Mahendra Singh Vs. Shankar Dayal Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-01-1935
Reported in: AIR1936All124; 159Ind.Cas.903
1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit brought by certain reversioners of the family of Ram Lochan Singh deceased who was the last male owner. The plaintiffs' case was that they were his next heirs and that he had died without any issue. There was previously a dispute in the revenue Court in which the plaintiff's were not successful. Hence the present suit. On behalf of the contesting defendant, Shankar Dayal Singh, it was first denied that the plaintiffs were the nearest collaterals and it was also pleaded that the defendant was the son of a daughter of the deceased Ram Lochan Singh, and was therefore entitled to succeed to the estate in preference to the plaintiffs. The trial Court framed issue 1 as to whether the plaintiffs were the reversionary heirs of the family of Ram Lochan Singh, and if so, was the defendant the daughter's son of Ram Lochan Singh? The lower Court has found that the plaintiffs are the collaterals, but has also found that the defendant is Ram Loch...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›